@Khalid Hussein
There are too many errors and a huge lapse in your understanding of the basic Islamic principles, be it Jurisprudence or otherwise. I suspect you are a member of the Salafist brand. They often tend to view anything related to the Islamic sciences as black or white.
I will clarify, why YOU are wrong.
1. Your first mistake was protesting the statement of the rationalists, that Allah or the Almighty entity exited without a place. This wouldn't have been an issue had you studied basic theology.
The statement isn't a verse from Qur'an nor is it from the traditions of the Prophet (SAW). It is however, a logical viewpoint that was extracted from a codified understanding of principles from the Qur'an. Allah says:
{{Do you not then you your intellect?}} Al Baqarah.
Time and space are created entities without a doubt. If God Almighty created time and space, then where was God before time and space were created? That is why the rationalists disdain the Salafist anthropomorphic view that God Almighty is literally in the sky sitting on a throne. It goes against common knowledge. Read some of the statements on creationism, atomism and the nature of God by Al Ghazali.
2. Your statement that the Deobandi school in India and the Ahbash of Lebanon hijacked the name Ahlus Sunnah is unsubstantiated. Both institutions, despite some of their political stances, have affirmed that they are of the Ash'arite/Maturidite schools. Which are the pre-dominant schools of Sunni Islam in the entire planet which comprises over 90%+ of the Islamic World. Unless you mean, only the Najdi Wahhabite school is Sunni and everyone else is non Sunni? 5% of the Islamic World is Sunni, the rest, what? Typical Salafist ramblings.
3. You said Mawlid is Haram? According to whom? Because the last time I checked, the vast majority of the scholars of the past have claimed that it is not only permissible, but very recommended. We have all the evidences that are required to show it is more than permissible. I also have statements of the most eminent scholars of the past claiming its permissibility. I hope you retract.
Your a Salafist, I'm not surprised you would spam the forums with your literalist interpretations. Go refer back to Ibn Rajab al Hanbali's commentary on 40 Hadith an Nawawi. He explains the true understanding of the hadith of bid'ah.
Firstly, your understanding of innovation is itself distorted. The real nature of innovation is that it isn't all blameworthy, one quote from Imam An Nawawi will suffice:
An Nawawi says in his commentary on Sahih Muslim:
قال النووى فى شرحه على صحيح مسلم"(6/154-155): قوله صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيهِ وَسَلَّمَ: (وَكُلُّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ) هذا عامٌّ مخصوص، والمراد: غالب البدع. قال أهل اللُّغة: هي كلّ شيء عمل عَلَى غير مثال سابق. قال العلماء: البدعة خمسة أقسام: واجبة، ومندوبة، ومحرَّمة، ومكروهة، ومباحة. فمن الواجبة: نظم أدلَّة المتكلّمين للرَّدّ عَلَى الملاحدة والمبتدعين وشبه ذلك. ومن المندوبة: تصنيف كتب العلم وبناء المدارس والرّبط وغير ذلك. ومن المباح: التّبسط في ألوان الأطعمة وغير ذلك. والحرام والمكروه ظاهران، وقد أوضحت المسألة بأدلَّتها المبسوطة في (تـهذيب الأسماء واللُّغات) فإذا عرف ما ذكرته علم أنَّ الحديث من العامّ المخصوص، وكذا ما أشبهه من الأحاديث الواردة، ويؤيّد ما قلناه قول عمر بن الخطَّاب رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ في التّـَراويح: نعمت البدعة، ولا يمنع من كون الحديث عامًّا مخصوصًا قوله: (كُلُّ بِدْعَةٍ) مؤكّدًا بـــــــ كلّ، بل يدخله التَّخصيص مع ذلك كقوله تعالى: {تُدَمّرُ كُلَّ شَىءٍ} [الأحقاف،ءاية 25]اهـ
"The statement of the Prophet (SAW): "Every innovation is a misguidance", is a generalised statement that isn't specified to everything and that which is intended in the meaning is: "Most innovations"... The scholars say: "Innovation is of 5 types: Obligatory innovations, recommended innovations, impermissible innovations, disliked innovations and permissible innovations. Obligatory innovations include: "Learning the sciences of rationale and logic to apprehend the atheists and their kind. Recommended innovations include: Authoring books on knowledge, building educational institutions... Permissible innovations include: Different strands of foods and other than that. That which is disliked and impermissible is already clear...."
After having clarified the wrong misconceptions you have about the nature of innovation, and we have established there are two types of innovation: good and bad. Let us see some of the edicts by some of the most scholarly people in the Law, let us read their views on Mawlid:
Quote No. 1:
Abu Shama (teacher of Imam an Nawawi) said:
قال الإمام أبو شامة شيخ الإمام النووي رحمهما الله: ( ومن أحسن ما ابتدع في زماننا، ما يفعل كلّ عام في اليوم الموافق ليوم مولده صلّى الله عليه وآله وصحبه وسلّم من الصدقات، والمعروف, وإظهار الزينة والسرور؛ فإنّ ذلك مع ما فيه من الإحسان للفقراء، مشعر بمحبّته صلّى الله عليه وآله وصحبه وسلّم, وتعظيمه في قلب فاعل ذلك, وشكراً لله على ما منَّ به من إيجاد رسوله صلّى الله عليه وآله وصحبه وسلّم الذي أرسله رحمة للعالمين) السيرة الحلبية لعلي بن برهان الدّين الحلبي (1/83- 84)
"Amongst the best things that have been innovated in our times is that which is the recurrent annual celebrations of the birthday of the Prophet (SAW), the date which aligns with his birth, where people give charity in abundance and do all sorts of good deeds, and people come out beautifying themselves and are extremely happy and in a state of joy. The event includes giving to the poor and many other manifest signs of the love of the Prophet (SAW), his family and his companions...."
Quote No. 2
Imam Jalaluddin al Suyuti rahimahullah:
قال الإمام السّيوطي رحمه الله: ( هو من البدع الحسنة التي يثاب عليها صاحبها؛ لما فيه من تعظيم قدر النبيّ صلّى الله عليه وآله وصحبه وسلّم، وإظهار الفرح والاستبشار بمولده الشريف) الحاوي للفتاوي (1/292)
"The Mawlid is from the good innovations, that in which the person will be rewarded for participating in...."
Quote 3:
Ibn Hajar al 'Asqalani rahimahullah:
قال الإمام ابن حجر العسقلاني رحمه الله: ( أصل عمل المولد بدعة، لم تنقل عن أحد من السّلف الصّالح من القرون الثلاثة, ولكنّها مع ذلك قد اشتملت على محاسن وضدّها, فمن تحرّى في عملها المحاسن, وجنّب ضدّها، كان بدعة حسنة, وإلا فلا
"The original ruling of the Mawlid is that it is an innovation, it certainly wasn't done in the early three generations, however it incorporates within it good and bad. Whoever participates in the good (that happens on the day) and avoids the bad. Then the ruling is that it is a good innovation. If those stipulations cannot be guaranteed then it is a blameworthy innovation..."
These are just a few of the quotes. I have many more but the situation doesn't permit more than what is relevant to each discussion.
I find it quite audacious that you quoted Ibn Hajar al 'Asqalani's views on innovation and completely sidestepped his own famous statements about the Mawlid. You need to widen your base. Your clearly an amateur at this.
Quoting fatawas by Ibn Baz and other Saudi Salafist scholars only scrutinises upon the fact that your entire knowledge is based upon the edicts of a few scholars who follow the traditional non rationalist literalist school.