Nowadays not much to be proud of,we are 400
Years behind the world
Years behind the world
Come on now, the present theory on the location suggests it was where Proto-Somalis lived.Did i say some thing wrong there?
they lived in the horn of africa (that area was well known by the greeks), so that rules out you people. goodbye.
Okay i see so you're all against me because of what i said. Now i understand how our friend @Aurelian must've felt when he said this.Come on now, the present theory on the location suggests it was where Proto-Somalis lived.
Most of the time I feel like him, hated for saying the truth.
sure.
Do those nubain type, north sudanese live in the HOA? were they known to live off solely meat and milk? we're they seafarers? No? then that's that.
you know we originated from North Sudan, right? people similar to us might have lived there too.
such a vague example
Most normal people would rather keep their history (especially when good) to themselves rather than assign it to others. What makes Somalis so different in that they do the opposite? Is it some sort of mental illness?
More archeology is being done as peace returns to the country, alx that would shut people like you up
I’m a noble Macrobian simply based off of intuition/vibes. There is no amount of material evidence that would change that. IdcAll the noble macrobians on this site now:
View attachment 270393
Well there goes my act and oscars worthy performance.You're not a martyr, walaal.
So let's dissect this properly. We know about macrobia thanks to herodotus and according to his description in terms of geography macrobia lay south of egypt in modern day sudan not somalia. Now do you mean to tell me that these macrobians that lived in sudan 2500 years ago were somali? If so did they speak somali? Who were the pastoralist that were living in somalia and depicted on the temple of hatshepsut 3500 years ago?No, it's the fact that what you're saying doesn't line up with present theories. It's best to go off that then a single source that presents an alternative view. I think I'll believe the widely agreed upon theory.
Well there goes my act and oscars worthy performance.
So let's dissect this properly. We know about macrobia thanks to herodotus and according to his description in terms of geography macrobia lay south of egypt in modern day sudan not somalia. Now do you mean to tell me that these macrobians that lived in sudan 2500 years ago were somali? If so did they speak somali? Who were the pastoralist that were living in somalia and depicted on the temple of hatshepsut 3500 years ago?
Out of line. @Garaad diinle is an exemplary anthro-buff and knowledgeable about Somali and Horner history while not a self-hater in the least. And by the time of the Macrobians our Cushitic speaking ancestors, even the later waves, would have most likely been gone from there over a thousand years ago. This is 500 BCE we're talking about. The earliest Y-DNA evidence of some of our ancestors still being in Sudan dates to around 2000 BCE and if you wanna go by some linguistic evidence maybe somewhere between 1000 BCE and 2000 BCE but by 500 BCE all of our ancestry would have firmly been within the Horn as far as I know.
And yeah, sure... we'd have been genetically and culturally closely related to those Nubians. In fact, Lower Nubians pretty much would have spoken a Cushitic language but we're not their descendants. It's like a Slav claiming the Indo-Iranian steppe nomads or Scythians or you claiming the South-Cushitic pastoralists whom the Tutsi descend from. Cousins? Yeah. Us? No.
the gold thing makes sense ngl.....I feel like it's so obvious it's Sudan just from the part about all the gold. Even now saaxiibs like Hemedti are rich (billions rich) cos of Sudan's vast gold reserves. Somalia's gold reserves are still untested and when the Greeks mention exports from our coast gold is barely or never mentioned. Same goes for medieval Arab sources. Gold is never emphasized as any kind of key export but it always was for Nubia, even during the middle ages.
I strongly agree with you on this one even in futuh it's been said that gold is acquired by amharas from nubian mines clearly assosiating gold with upper nubia or sudan. On top of that the macrobians were known according to heradotus for their archery and during the islamic futuh arabs mentioned how nubians or sudanese were master archers and therefore couldn't conquer them. This clearly parallels combyses.I feel like it's so obvious it's Sudan just from the part about all the gold. Even now saaxiibs like Hemedti are rich (billions rich) cos of Sudan's vast gold reserves. Somalia's gold reserves are still untested and when the Greeks mention exports from our coast gold is barely or never mentioned. Same goes for medieval Arab sources. Gold is never emphasized as any kind of key export but it always was for Nubia, even during the middle ages.
ok what about punt?
Of courseI was just reflecting last night & I think for the first time in my life I admitted to myself that I am not proud being somali. I was blindly patriotic as a child, but after learning about qabilism, the state of our government, the treatment that women & children go through back home, the continuous drought & famine, the fact that our lands are occupied by our enemies & lack of ancient somali history (DON’T U DARE MENTION MACROBIA OR PUNT! UNLESS THERE IS EVIDENCE LINKING US TO IT, ITS PSUEDOHISTORY) the list could go on forever. But I would like to clarify I dont hate being somali, I just dont see y ppl r boastful about it.