Are Salafis the cause of terrorism?

[Malcolm X]

I know a lot of salafis, none of them support terrorism. Their scholars do not support terrorism.

I found a leaflet from them saying they do not support terrorism or suicide bombing.

https://www.masjidbinbaz.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ISIS-Jihad-Leaflet-Masjid-Ibn-Baz.pdf

So, if they don't support terrorism, why do we keep blaming them for terrorism?

This also goes for Muslims. It wasn't a long ago people blamed terrorism on Islam. We stood up to them.

Now they blame terrorism on salafis, some of us come out to support them instead of defending the salafis.

The quote below fits the situation:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

 

[Raamsade]

While Salafism is the most extreme interpretation of Islam, the problem is Islam itself. For instance, the overwhelming majority of Muslims will say an apostate should be killed simply for leaving Islam. Unfortunately, Islamic terrorism will be with us so long this type of mindset is norm among Muslims.

 

[Don]

I know a lot of salafis, none of them support terrorism. Their scholars do not support terrorism.

I found a leaflet from them saying they do not support terrorism or suicide bombing.

https://www.masjidbinbaz.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ISIS-Jihad-Leaflet-Masjid-Ibn-Baz.pdf

So, if they don't support terrorism, why do we keep blaming them for terrorism?

This also goes for Muslims. It wasn't a long ago people blamed terrorism on Islam. We stood up to them.

Now they blame terrorism on salafis, some of us come out to support them instead of defending the salafis.

The quote below fits the situation:

Those are Madkhalis not Salafis. However, to answer your question:

No, we are not the cause of terrorism. The cause of terrorism is America & her allies.

 

[Sarah136]

Salafis are free from such attacks. You should look into the khawaarij and madkhalis

 

[axmedxajiisback]

I know a lot of salafis, none of them support terrorism. Their scholars do not support terrorism.

I found a leaflet from them saying they do not support terrorism or suicide bombing.

https://www.masjidbinbaz.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ISIS-Jihad-Leaflet-Masjid-Ibn-Baz.pdf

So, if they don't support terrorism, why do we keep blaming them for terrorism?

This also goes for Muslims. It wasn't a long ago people blamed terrorism on Islam. We stood up to them.

Now they blame terrorism on salafis, some of us come out to support them instead of defending the salafis.

The quote below fits the situation:

Salafis are trying to emulate the life and conduct of the early Muslim community. They don't bend the meaning of Quran and hadith to fit a 21st century world view (i.e. emphasizing the verse about no compulsion in religion etc.). They don't explicitly support terrorism. No one is knowingly pro terror. The problem is that the more literal you follow the Quran and Sunnah, the more likely you are to act on the violent verses and hadiths. That's why people blame them for terror.

 

[axmedxajiisback]

Those are Madkhalis not Salafis. However, to answer your question:

No, we are not the cause of terrorism. The cause of terrorism is America & her allies.

That's why the Americans put Jihad verses in the Quran and forced Muhammad to order Jihad.

 

[axmedxajiisback]

Salafis are free from such attacks. You should look into the khawaarij and madkhalis

The "khawaarij" and "madkhalis" read the Quran and Sunnah and do what it says, including the parts where violent jihad against the kafirs and munaafiqun is commanded. You hate them because of the terror and mayhem but what you're actually saying is you hate your religion and what it commands. You just need to be open and honest about it instead of grouping Muslims into 800 categories.

 

[axmedxajiisback]

I know a lot of salafis, none of them support terrorism. Their scholars do not support terrorism.

I found a leaflet from them saying they do not support terrorism or suicide bombing.

https://www.masjidbinbaz.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ISIS-Jihad-Leaflet-Masjid-Ibn-Baz.pdf

So, if they don't support terrorism, why do we keep blaming them for terrorism?

This also goes for Muslims. It wasn't a long ago people blamed terrorism on Islam. We stood up to them.

Now they blame terrorism on salafis, some of us come out to support them instead of defending the salafis.

The quote below fits the situation:

As for that quote, the end should go like this: then they came for the Salafis, and it was about f'ing time. I don't need salafis to speak up for me when they come for me.

 

[Lord Flacko]

Yes. Overwhelmingly yes. f*ck them.

 

[Dino]

Salafism is not a sect. It's a manhaj. A methodolgy. and No salafism is not the cause of terrorism. If it were that would make the companions of the prophet all terrorists

 

[Don]

Salafism is not a sect. It's a manhaj. A methodolgy. and No salafism is not the cause of terrorism. If it were that would make the companions of the prophet all terrorists

Terrorist is what the big army calls the little army.

Real terrorists are America & her allies. There is no other form of terrorism!

 

[Rorschach]

I was watching The Killing$ of Tony Blair, by the brilliant George Galloway, and had that nauseous feeling from mid-2000's again: how did these f****** get away with the Iraq War? The scale of damage and chaos the Western coalition brought to that region in 2003 was nothing short of a tragedy.

Then we have axmaq cattle here scratching their heads over the cause of terrorism - as if the early 2000's never happened. As if playing the sects against each other, Shock&Awe, setting up camps like Camp Bucca, mass-torture, chemical attacks, mass-rape, mass-looting etc. was inconsequential. As if all of this was an accident.

What the Western-coalition have done to Iraq will hover over the global community for decades to come.

 

[Don]

I was watching The Killing$ of Tony Blair, by the brilliant George Galloway, and had that nauseous feeling from mid-2000's again: how did these f****** get away with the Iraq War? The scale of damage and chaos the Western coalition brought to that region in 2003 was nothing short of a tragedy.

Then we have axmaq cattle here scratching their heads over the cause of terrorism - as if the early 2000's never happened. As if playing the sects against each other, Shock&Awe, setting up camps like Camp Bucca, mass-torture, chemical attacks, mass-rape, mass-looting etc. was inconsequential. As if all of this was an accident.

What the Western-coalition have done to Iraq will hover over the global community for decades to come.

It's a war against Islam. What's worse than all this is Muslims who overlook everything the west does, and only focus on what Muslims are doing. They love to kiss ass & feet. They are the typical house Negroes, "obey your masta" is their favourite line, they are scum & poison in our society.

 

[Raamsade]

I was watching The Killing$ of Tony Blair, by the brilliant George Galloway, and had that nauseous feeling from mid-2000's again: how did these f****** get away with the Iraq War? The scale of damage and chaos the Western coalition brought to that region in 2003 was nothing short of a tragedy.

Then we have axmaq cattle here scratching their heads over the cause of terrorism - as if the early 2000's never happened. As if playing the sects against each other, Shock&Awe, setting up camps like Camp Bucca, mass-torture, chemical attacks, mass-rape, mass-looting etc. was inconsequential. As if all of this was an accident.

What the Western-coalition have done to Iraq will hover over the global community for decades to come.

And yet, the vast majority of the world Muslims believe that apostates should be killed. Go figure!

 

[Rorschach]

And yet, the vast majority of the world Muslims believe that apostates should be killed. Go figure!

The clock started in 2001 for you. Maskiin baa tahay saxiib orod seexo.

Apostasy laws

 

[Raamsade]

The clock started in 2001 for you. Maskiin baa tahay saxiib orod seexo.

Apostasy laws

The fact you think murdering people is a source of levity only proofs my point. Muslims have normalized terroristic thoughts (i.e. murdering people for dissenting) then act all shocked when their young men commit acts of terror.

The clock for apostasy laws started in 7th century arabia. Deal with it!

 

[Don]

The fact you think murdering people is a source of levity only proofs my point. Muslims have normalized terroristic thoughts (i.e. murdering people for dissenting) then act all shocked when their young men commit acts of terror.

The clock for apostasy laws started in 7th century arabia. Deal with it!

You are the one who normalised the terror of the west against the Muslims.

However Muslims respond to it is just that, a response (you could call it counter terrorism even), but you are the aggressors.

 

[Rorschach]

The fact you think murdering people is a source of levity only proofs my point. Muslims have normalized terroristic thoughts (i.e. murdering people for dissenting) then act all shocked when their young men commit acts of terror.

The clock for apostasy laws started in 7th century arabia. Deal with it!

Just...just go away man. There's no reasoning with you.

 

[Raamsade]

You are the one who normalised the terror of the west against the Muslims.

However Muslims respond to it is just that, a response (you could call it counter terrorism even), but you are the aggressors.

I know I hit a raw nerve but son, pray tell what does the vast majority of Muslims believing that apostates should be murdered have to do with the West?

 

[Raamsade]

Just...just go away man. There's no reasoning with you.

Oh! How the elephant has laboured nightly and turned up a mouse!

You came into this thread all gun-ho and when I put you in your place, you're quietly slither away like a snake.