Anglos Team Up Against China

The UK, USA and Australia have announced they've formed a Military Alliance to counter China's rise to power in the Indo-Pacific region. The Aussies will benefit from British & American expertise in Nuclear Submarine Technology and they'll collaborate with their British Kinsmen in the construction of Nuclear Submarines for the Aussie Navy.

The Americans and Brits want to enhance Australia's military capabilities so they can have a strong Western/Anglo partner in the region that will stand up to China.



On a side note, France won a A$50bn (€31bn; £27bn) contract to build 12 submarines for the Australian Navy in 2016. The Aussies could possibly walk away from this deal in light of them joining this defence pact with their Anglo Brothers and will now take the opportunity to acquire Nuclear Submarines from the British.
 
Last edited:

Apollo

VIP
Somalia should join team China when it comes to Indo-Pacific global power politics.

China doesn't care about your ethics or political system. they are purely pragmatic. The West are a bunch of fags who will put sanctions on you for not having legalized butt sex in your country and are all up your business.
 
Somalia should join team China when it comes to Indo-Pacific global power politics.

China doesn't care about your ethics or political system. they are purely pragmatic. The West are a bunch of fags who will put sanctions on you for not having legalized butt sex in your country and are all up your business.
The smarter approach would be to just remain Neutral and play off the Chinese & Westerners against each other to advance your interests.
 
In 1949, China declared independence, an event known in Western discourse as "the loss of China" – in the US, with bitter recriminations and conflict over who was responsible for that loss. The terminology is revealing. It is only possible to lose something that one owns. The tacit assumption was that the U.S. owned China, by right, along with most of the rest of the world, much as postwar planners assumed. The "loss of China" was the first major step in "America's decline." It had major policy consequences.
 
Interesting development
In 1949, China declared independence, an event known in Western discourse as "the loss of China" – in the US, with bitter recriminations and conflict over who was responsible for that loss. The terminology is revealing. It is only possible to lose something that one owns. The tacit assumption was that the U.S. owned China, by right, along with most of the rest of the world, much as postwar planners assumed. The "loss of China" was the first major step in "America's decline." It had major policy consequences.

China is alone in this World, not even fellow East Asians will want to ally with them [besides the useless North Koreans]. In addition, Russia is not an ally of China since they have conflicting interests over Central Asia and the Russians are worried about the possibility of their vast under-populated Far-Eastern territories being annexed by China in the future.

I'm confident the Anglos+NATO and Non-Western allied Nations[Japan, South Korea etc.] will overcome China in War.
 
Somalia should join team China when it comes to Indo-Pacific global power politics.

China doesn't care about your ethics or political system. they are purely pragmatic. The West are a bunch of fags who will put sanctions on you for not having legalized butt sex in your country and are all up your business.

The West doesn't really care about your ethics either; they only pull out that talk about 'liberal democracy', human rights and minority protection when your Government is not politically and economically subordinated to the Wall-Street/Washington consensus.

The United States supports dozens of repressive Governments in the world at this very moment; one estimate contends that the United States supports 73% of the world's dictatorships.

There is the notion that the United States is a "liberal hegemon", and that its desire to spread 'liberal values' is the reason it gets into so many quagmires.

Here's a great video that expounds on that:


PS: Countries like ours are in no position to explicitly join either side; Australia makes more money in one day than either of our Nations do in an entire year.
 
Last edited:

Periplus

It is what it is
VIP

The Eastern African seaboard is seen as part and parcel of the Indo-Pacific region. Many powers have already started stamping their influence. China/Japan/US/France all have bases in Djibouti and India has extensive business interests in Kenya/Tanzania. China is also a big investor in Ethiopia.

What about Somalia?

The thing is that Somalia is seen as a free for all and each government wants to make safe political investments, even if it is contradictory. Each federal member state and the FGS have been courted by these governments with aid packages and development projects, hoping that when Somalia settles down, they remember their generosity.

If Somalia settles down in the next decade, the cold war will have started in earnest and these governments will be mentioning their "long and fruitful relationship between them and Somalia".
 

reer

VIP
The Eastern African seaboard is seen as part and parcel of the Indo-Pacific region. Many powers have already started stamping their influence. China/Japan/US/France all have bases in Djibouti and India has extensive business interests in Kenya/Tanzania. China is also a big investor in Ethiopia.

What about Somalia?

The thing is that Somalia is seen as a free for all and each government wants to make safe political investments, even if it is contradictory. Each federal member state and the FGS have been courted by these governments with aid packages and development projects, hoping that when Somalia settles down, they remember their generosity.

If Somalia settles down in the next decade, the cold war will have started in earnest and these governments will be mentioning their "long and fruitful relationship between them and Somalia".
10% of the world trade is through the suez canal/red sea/gulf of aden.
houthis are still strong and a stable somalia would take the anti iran stance of the gulf or neutral.
 

Lebron James

4 Time NBA Champion
VIP
10% of the world trade is through the suez canal/red sea/gulf of aden.
houthis are still strong and a stable somalia would take the anti iran stance of the gulf or neutral.
They'd f*ck up taking the anti iran stance that'd be dumbest decision to side with anything to do with the gulf. Iran-Somalia ties need to be strengthened
 

reer

VIP
They'd f*ck up taking the anti iran stance that'd be dumbest decision to side with anything to do with the gulf. Iran-Somalia ties need to be strengthened
iran is funding sectarian shia rebels in yemen our doorstep and their economy is ravaged by sanctions. they can keep their safavidism away from us.
 
The Eastern African seaboard is seen as part and parcel of the Indo-Pacific region. Many powers have already started stamping their influence. China/Japan/US/France all have bases in Djibouti and India has extensive business interests in Kenya/Tanzania. China is also a big investor in Ethiopia.

What about Somalia?

The thing is that Somalia is seen as a free for all and each government wants to make safe political investments, even if it is contradictory. Each federal member state and the FGS have been courted by these governments with aid packages and development projects, hoping that when Somalia settles down, they remember their generosity.

If Somalia settles down in the next decade, the cold war will have started in earnest and these governments will be mentioning their "long and fruitful relationship between them and Somalia".

That's a very good write up.

With all of that in mind... which one of the juggernautts would you like Somalia to align with?
 

Lebron James

4 Time NBA Champion
VIP
iran is funding sectarian shia rebels in yemen our doorstep and their economy is ravaged by sanctions. they can keep their safavidism away from us.
Thats media propaganda, everything is always blamed on Iran while the gulf especially saudi which sent bombs to Yemen is overlooked and never questioned. Iran is the only country i'd every want Somalia to align with. The gulf has played a role in meddling with Somalia and still people show them love sad stuff. But of course they're arab we gotta suck them off huh :sass2:
 
Last edited:
Thats media propaganda, everything is always blamed on Iran while the gulf especially yemen which sent bombs to Yemen is overlooked and never questioned. Iran is the only country i'd every want Somalia to align with. The gulf has played a role in meddling with Somalia and still people show them love sad stuff. But of course they're arab we gotta suck them off huh :sass2:

gotcha-alrighty-then.gif


So you want to align with a Nation (an all around pariah) that can't get access to medicines and spare parts for its civilian aircraft? That's fu***** mental, mate.

Next suggestion... let's drink bleach in lieu of water.

ok-okay.gif


PS: You must (hopefully) be trolling.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top