Are you now sympathetic towards Tate?
Are you now sympathetic towards Tate?
This is the level you’ reached?
Why would you think it would be a conspiracy when the man literally snitched on himself various times?
You’ll defend a man that has said with his own mouth that he would date a woman and than turn her into a prostitute but slander digital nomads and analyse everything they say, yet you’ll age deaf, dumb and blind with regards to what Tate says. Why? Because he’s a Muslim right? Where was your husn Al Dhan for your Muslim sisters?
You have an agenda and it’s clear to see.
What’s hilarious is that a bit of reading would have told you that Romania has always had high trafficking rates and low convictions. This has always been known, even by the very man you want to defend. He literally said that he moved to Romania so that he could get away with a bit more. He said it and you can’t even accuse me of slander.
Like I said, you have an agenda. You don’t want to watch what Tate says, you don’t even bother to look into the history of Romanian trafficking gangs ect. You simply want to defend a man who practically snitches on himself, yet when it comes to your sisters in Islam you want to insinuate and play detective and analyze every word.
Authobillah.
Yes, how I knew you’d resort to the ‘feminist’ buzzword. What makes my argument against you ‘feminist’? Why because I’m a woman? Lol so any woman that has issues with your Low-IQ takes is a feminist?The last time you tagged me with another feminist-rage filled rant you made the same accusations that I slandered the digital sisterhood and went quiet when I asked you to provide evidence. I am still waiting.
Yes, you are only to be found accusing sisters of doing haram, whilst simultaneously defending a man who has literally snitched on himself by using the words of a man who himself said is a ‘conspiracy theory’The one with an agenda here is clear as you are only to be found in gender war threads and nowhere else.
This isn’t about that and it really shows your lack of critical thinking. I mean if this is how you think then good luck. The man literally snitched on himself. How about you listen to what Tate says, using the very same skills you used to listen to digital sisterhood?If you believe the west is targeting Andrew Tate because he is misogynist we have nothing to discuss.
West this, West that. I’d understand your concern if Tate, your idol didn’t go on camera and expose himself. No doubt the West is corrupt. Epstein was arrested, but the list of those who visited his Island have been hidden. But what does have to do with an idiot like Tate who literally went on camera and spoke about his methods and why he went to RomaniaAs mentioned in the above tweets there has been no effort to arrest or expose the Epstein child trafficking ring and there are a million other distasteful characters but the west obsession with silencing Andrew Tate is obviously due to his criticisms of their liberal world order, they would not care if he was a criminal in every other way.
If not defending a man who literally told the world that he has dated women and then pimped them out and then refuses to let them leave their house makes me feminist then so be it. But one thing I can say with certainty is that you’re immoral.I do not agree with nor view the world through your feminist paradigm so I do not understand why you tag me each time with your imagined charges, it goes nowhere. You are free to hold your views I do not bother engaging you on them because I have seen your disengenuousness when it comes to accusations.
Answer my question:
Answer my question:
1. Do you deny that Tate said on camera that he dated women and then turns them into prostitutes.
2. Do you deny that Tate said that he moved to Romania because it’s corrupt and easy to get away with things?
Those aren’t mere views. It is him talking about what he did/does. Prostituting women isn’t a ‘view’ it is an action.The onus is on you to prove Tate made those remarks? And even if he said, he revered to Islam, so it is not like we're gonna hold those views against him since he is a Muslim now.
Lol, I never said you called those girls ‘s’ I said you posted the post of a twitter user that did and then proceeded to post him. I even called you out on that on that original thread. So nice try. But what is a fact is that you were hell bent on calling out these girls and analyzing what they said but you’ll turn a blind eye to what Tate has said. Have you bothered to analyse or watch Tate or is that only reserved for your Muslim sisters?Notice how @Angelina still did not provide evidence of the alleged slander I did against the digital sisterhood after asking again?
Aww, are you upset that I said Tate is your idol? What do you call it when someone still proceeds to defend someone when that said person has exposed themselves on camera? What do you call that when you have to resort to a journalist who himself calls this entire thread a mere conspiracy theory and you even posted a video with less than 1000 views as some sort of evidence whilst evading the biggest evidence of all: Tate’s own words.Also notice how she went from shocked I posted about Andrew Tate to calling him my "idol", it takes a couple of posts it seems.
A disingenuous waste of time for those who waste energy on these back and forths.
Brother you are doing a great job, ignore this feminist demonic presence. Tate is part of Allah plan to destroy the moraless Western gentrified feminist cesspool that it is!Notice how @Angelina still did not provide evidence of the alleged slander I did against the digital sisterhood after asking again?
Also notice how she went from shocked I posted about Andrew Tate to calling him my "idol", it takes a couple of posts it seems.
A disingenuous waste of time for those who waste energy on these back and forths.
Those aren’t mere views. It is him talking about what he did/does. Prostituting women isn’t a ‘view’ it is an action.
He did on video. I can send it. That is what is hilarious about this whole thing. You don’t even bother to watch this man’s video. Even in the other thread about Tate, this Islamic speaker/scholar watched his videos and was commenting on it.
That isn’t the point though. It’s about the fact that this man said he dates these women and then pimps them out which is literally called the loverboy method. A tactic used in trafficking. How can you then defend someone like that? I get if you don’t wAnt to say he is guilty without waiting for an official verdicts but he literally exposes himself and it is too documented for you to deny this.
Also, he talks about how he moved to Romania due to how corrupt it is and that they can easily be bribed. He also talks about not letting these girls leave the house.
I’d a 100% get Amuuse’s point if his idol wasn’t such a tool that would expose himself.