I've said it 100 times but there's no point in doing "genetic analysis" unless you have an anthropological biology PHD lol
Not at all. Nothing they do is remotely that complicated. If you know your way around C++, R or Python and understand basic genetics you'll pretty much be fine. And nowadays the coding part is not even much of a barrier thanks to LLMs like GPT. Hell, I bet you a lot of these geneticists were originally just given a set of code blocks to copy-paste and spam for their various analyses and aren't in a lot of cases truly competent C++ coders or whatever else.
To be honest, DIY work is sorely needed because most population geneticists are COMPLETELY bereft of archaeological, historical or cultural anthropological knowledge and therefore make some of the dumbest takes known to man as David over at Eurogenes recently pointed out:
This quote, from a new paper at Nature , High-resolution genomic history of early medieval Europe by Speidel et al., is the most idiotic ta...
eurogenes.blogspot.com
Davidski said...
It must be said that the ancient DNA revolution is sadly a bit of a clownshow.
100% percent cosign. Also, you don't even need their PhDs or degrees to get published in places like Nature. Take the time to compose a well-written scientific paper in the right format, know the right people and they'd let even some dude with no bachelors' paper through if it was good enough. No joke.
That being said, I basically studied Analytics/Data Science. Stats and any form of data analysis is right up my alley. People with my qualifications frequently do Bioinformatics and pop-gen type work. There's like one conversation between me and the right person or a few side certs from switching from Finance to their field. But I prefer the latter field for obvious reasons...