A Thread On Twitter Trending That Sadly Can't Be Debunked

Diaspora ambassador

''Dagaalka gala'' Garaad Jaamac Garaad Cali
VIP
Chinese won't do sh*t all their current society is based on european models (everything from Architecture to clothings is european) ; they can only imitate. These guys literally did nothing remarkable in 5000 years of history meanwhile europeans conquered 3/4 of the planet.

"gunpowder" he said :mjlol:
Yeah sure they copied some stuff like the Japanese did and the entire west copied from the world which they used as a foundation to improve upon. The chinese have surpassed every damn metric. Even with their population decline they will still be a enormous population compared to the rest of the world.

The thing is the Chinese where not that united in the past and did not have the urge to conquer the world. Nowadays things changed, they are the thorn in the eye of the usa instead of being a satellite state like almost all of us allies.

They are planning to take over this planet. And to be fair they plan better than any jewish group in history. Mark my words the future is indhoyar.
 
Been reading more about this, still scratching the surface. Especially have focused on the tset-tset fly and the disease ot spreads, trypanosomiasis. What other geographical constraints has Africa faced and still faces
The presence of the deadly Tsetse fly caused low agricultural productivity, population density and technology adoption in the majority of Africa. Africa also lacks navigable rivers compared to Europe and Asia, with the exception of the Nile.

If you look out for the regions that developed the fastest and best during the early ages, they all had fertile land and shippable rivers. Very often that goes hand in hand aswell. For example, Mesopotamia, Egypt, India and China etc.

Check out the book "prisoners of geography" by Tim Marshall and "how they rule the world" by Pedro Banks.
 
You simply don't really know much about Europe's history and those same middle eastern civilizations failed at repelling greeks and ended up being dominated by them.

Right, you do realise that the distance between Greeco-Roman civilizations and the ancient civilizations of the Middle-East and North Africa is the same distance between our time and Rome?

Did you expect them to stay on top forever? Civilizations rise, expand, decay, decline and fall.

Also look at how static civilizations were in the middle east compared to what Greece did or even Romans who dominated carthage and completely erased their city.

Yes, using all the components that they received from the Middle-East.

Furthermore, you're pointing to groups of Europeans (Greco-Romans) that have substantial MENA ancestry, so if the Europeans are inherently superior, why don't you point to all the wonderful Scandinavian civilizations from the same period

:drakewtf:


It clearly points to both inherent superiority and environnemental advantage ;

Barring some environmental disadvantages that bridled your ubermensch Northern Europeans, why didn't they create civilizations instead of the MENA admixed and culturally influenced Greeks and Romans?

you can make an analogy with ashkenazi jews who outperform most minorities in the west and studies showed they have the highest mean IQ but you all will say it's a coincidence lol

I admittedly have no familiarity with the material on Jewish intelligence

I'll look into it.
 
Right, you do realise that the distance between Greeco-Roman civilizations and the ancient civilizations of the Middle-East and North Africa is the same distance between our time and Rome?

Did you expect them to stay on top forever? Civilizations rise, expand, decay, decline and fall.



Yes, using all the components that they received from the Middle-East.

Furthermore, you're pointing to groups of Europeans (Greco-Romans) that have substantial MENA ancestry, so if the Europeans are inherently superior, why don't you point to all the wonderful Scandinavian civilizations from the same period

:drakewtf:




Barring some environmental disadvantages that bridled your ubermensch Northern Europeans, why didn't they create civilizations instead of the MENA admixed and culturally influenced Greeks and Romans?



I admittedly have no familiarity with the material on Jewish intelligence

I'll look into it.

Is this a joke ? Never heard of Minoans/myceneans ? Persians literally got humiliated while they had much bigger armies and ressources and later greeks went as far as India.

They didn't have substantial level of Mena ancestry you project the current profiles onto the ancient ones. People like minoans/myceneans had far less MENA ancestry and were similar to modern north italians. Republican romans too were similar to northern iberians while the later decadent imperial romans saw a shift towards the east med due to the massive influx of east med slaves. Scandinavia was barely inhabited lol extremely low demography that's not comparable but now as you can see those "savage" north euros are performing better than any nation and all of this is degraded by immigrants.

as for Ashkenazi Jews :

Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group for which there are reliable data. They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European average, corresponding to an IQ 112 – 115.


It is argued here that the evidence favors what is termed the "default hypothesis": Because of their above-average intelligence and concentration in influential urban areas, Jews in recent history have been overrepresented in all major intellectual and political movements, including conservative movements, that were not overtly anti-Semitic.


so why is it crazy to think that europeans produce more intelligent individuals than other ethnicities ?
 
The amount of technological innovation from Europe in the past 300 years far surpasses anything made from the middle ages/antiquity.
White man won, game over. Accept it. Africa will never catch up.
Its a lot harder to lay the foundation and make the inital discoveries than simply build off established knowlege
 

Awad

عادل | جامعة الدفاع العربي
Its a lot harder to lay the foundation and make the inital discoveries than simply build off established knowlege
No single region/ethnic group made these "initial discoveries", they all built off one another just like Europe.
It's nothing more than a cope to downplay the sheer dominance Europeans ployed across the globe.
 
Last edited:
No single region/ethnic made these "initial discoveries", they all built off one another just like Europe.
It's nothing more than a cope to downplay the sheer dominance Europeans ployed across the globe.
initial discoveries. Read that word very carefully. If nobody made the first discovery, how could they simply "build off each other?"

Something like agriculture (the very foundation of civilisation building) was discovered independently in three places (ie. no "building off each other") .

The Nile Cresent (North east africa), West Africa and East Asia


dumbass
 
He is completely right.

The course of history has shown that whites(western europeans in particular) are superior to all other races in terms of accomplishments. it took only 200 years since the discovery of the americas for western europeans to dominate the globe.
Infinitely more admirable than "muh middle easterners made math and inventions and shiet"

Instead of trying to grasp at straw or talk aimlessly to make yourself feel better, try your best to implement this strategy in your life.

Become great at something, master it, dominate it, and use the spoils to get a foothold in every other practice.

reminder that somalis could do the exact same, if we werent so preoccupied with qabil discussions and other nonsense. One day we might accomplish something as great as that inshallah
 
I cant lie after the Fall of Ottomon empire, the white man secured his place at the top of the foodchain. But it wasnt always like this only in the last 500 years… Prior to dark ages white people were just as Barbaric and tribal as us. It was due to the Roman Empire civilizing the Germanic and Anglo tribes that lead to their epitomy..

Prior to that a Moor had more wealth and power than the white man
Ironically, Somalis were much more civilised than we are today in the so called Dark ages 😂
 
This video is a great distillation of the geographical disadvantages Africa was saddled with
just a bunch of cope to explain why subsaharans havent done shit

Mayans and incas had similarly bad terrain (jungles, rocky mountains, swamps, etc), yet that didn't stop them from building amazing monuments and having great scientific discoveries despite being disconnected from the rest of the world

at the end of the day, its competitveness that causes greatness. Most Africans were just contempt with living peaceful lives, foraging and farming. Whereas europeans were in constant warfare with eachother, and they had to adapt and invent things or they would fall behind and die off
 

El Nino

Cabsi cabsi
VIP
Scandinavia was barely inhabited lol extremely low demography that's not comparable but now as you can see those "savagee" north euros are performing better than any nation and all of this is degraded by immigrants.

why is it crazy to think that europeans produce more intelligent individuals than other ethnicities ?

Its fucking unnatural to admit inferiority when these people are mere men who shit, eat and bleed just like the rest of us. Romans thought northern europeans were savaged and good for nothing. Should they have accepted their
”lowly” status? Modern (agriculture) history of humans is new compared to 10s of thousand of years humans spent as wandering hunter gatherers. So much has changed in short time. Who knows what the future entails. Your attitude is dangerous, because it halts the mind. Appointment with dakaatir Umar needed immediately. The coon chip has activated.
 

Awad

عادل | جامعة الدفاع العربي
initial discoveries. Read that word very carefully. If nobody made the first discovery, how could they simply "build off each other?"

Something like agriculture (the very foundation of civilisation building) was discovered independently in three places (ie. no "building off each other") .

The Nile Cresent (North east africa), West Africa and East Asia


dumbass
I was referring to the middle ages/antiquity. Agriculture started developing over 10,000 years ago you absolute retard. Any initial discovery for a subject during this time period has never been solely developed by a single ethnic group andor region.
:wtfdis:
 

Khanderson

Coping through the 1st world
VIP
Nigerians be moving like white supremacists :meleshame:

Our racism is merely banter and ignorance since we don’t share any genetic makeup with them
which is understandable.

but I never understood the self they have for their African peers (especially AA’s).

It’s so bad they made fun of their ancestors getting in enslaved and not knowing that’s their ancestors they’re insulting.

weird dynamic.

:jcoleno:
 
:dead::damn::susp:

This dude is the Super Saiyan of coons

The man is weak, pathetic and ignorant; he seems to be saying that there is a genetic, inherent component to the inferiority he feels; he also seems to think that the Europeans were the first to progress to civilization, when virtually every building block of civilization came from the Middle-East and North Africa.

Soft-core coons like Thomas Sowell at least recognise that geography hampered Africa's development.
It's remarkable sub saharan Africa could even sustain any type of civilization given how much nature wanted to pack us. Cadaans couldn't even properly explore the damn continent until they invented vaccines. Cacuasoids north Africans never traveled down south for a reason, but we're are just barbarians right? For fucks sake racists/self haters are retarded
 
@Dawalhabaad

Alright, you win... you're absolutely right, mate

Your future children will be inherently inferior to their white counterparts and always will be

Iron Man Eye Roll GIF


PS: The Minoans were greatly influenced by their MENA neighbours and they were far younger than ancient Egypt and Sumer.
 
Last edited:
just a bunch of cope to explain why subsaharans havent done shit

Mayans and incas had similarly bad terrain (jungles, rocky mountains, swamps, etc), yet that didn't stop them from building amazing monuments and having great scientific discoveries despite being disconnected from the rest of the world

at the end of the day, its competitveness that causes greatness. Most Africans were just contempt with living peaceful lives, foraging and farming. Whereas europeans were in constant warfare with eachother, and they had to adapt and invent things or they would fall behind and die off
I agree with you on the point that Europe was a confined area that made warfare constant and this created the social pressure needed to advance ideas. I don't know about you saying Africans preferred peacefulness and foraging + farming though, that's clearly false and biased on your part.

There were periods in African history where neighbouring kingdoms and tribal fiefdoms waged constant war, this is how most of the slaves in the Atlantic slave trade were sourced from.
 

Trending

Top