The Somali word for flood, which is "daad", is pronounced with a plain "d", not the emphatic "ḍ" (ض) of Arabic.
He pops up randomly and freestyles linguistics and etymology in every thread.
So he spits out pseudo-linguistics and folk etymology on purpose. There’s no point in approaching him with sincerity.
He connects Somali "dad" with Arabic "qawm" --> Aramaic --> Hebrew -->Latin “homo” --> English “human”
Due to significant time constraints, I am unable to engage in the forum on a daily basis.
May we proceed with calmness, engage in constructive conversation, and maintain a rational and respectful demeanor.
Could you please elaborate on the specific linguistic qualifications and evaluative criteria that inform your assessment of my research as falling within the domains of pseudo-linguistics and folk etymology?
He connects Somali "dad" with Arabic "qawm" --> Aramaic --> Hebrew -->Latin “homo” --> English “human” .
Why do you refuse and oppose the existence of a relationship between them?
On what grounds did you base your decision?