The question doesn't make sense at all on many different basis, let's dissect them one by one.
If your off the polytheistic atheist Europhile world view, there is no free will, it's part of their doctrine that everything is 'deterministic', the molecules and atoms your made up off and the chemical reactions your not in control off, determines everything about you, including your choice, taste and behaviour.
Hence you have absurdities like 'gay gene' and perhaps soon it will be argued paedophile gene or even worse as we further delve into this crazed never ending abyss of irreversible lunacy.
Hence if you don't believe in God, you have neither choice nor free will, and hence nothing you say can be an 'objective' statement, because in a deterministic world view everything you 'say' 'type' or do are subjective to only your own individual molecular animal make-up and the chemical reactions taking place in your individual body unique to you, which have no control off, and is also part of your doctrine.
An 'objective' statement means you are rising above the bondage of captivity and hence have free-will and choice, go and read your God's Hawkins, Dawkins, Harris quotes there is no 'free will' and their open support for 'determinism', which makes perfect sense in that lunatic world view.
Hence if what your making is an 'objective' statement in this topic, which you obliviously like to think, because an 'objective' statement is proof of free will and choice, then such a statement can only be made with the assumption of the existence of a omnipotent omniscient God because you are rising above the bondage of subjective captivity and determinism.
You have basically proved the existence of God with this very topic, if you argue your statement is not 'objective' and hence subjective which it would be in a deterministic world view, your statement would be subjective to your own unique molecular make up and reactions, in which case, I am missing the point you are actually trying to make here.
It's like you telling me you had a sandwich and bacon for lunch without me even asking you! it's an absurd thing to say, absurd question to ask, because the question itself refutes your premise, because it requires an objective statement, which assumes free-will, which assumes free choice, which assumes the existence of a omnipotent omniscient god.
@VixR @simulacrum
Let me hear your views on this painful conundrum that all your Europhile God's dismiss free will and only believe in determinism which is the only logical conclusion you can come to when your nothing more then molecular atoms in a chemical reaction combustion you have no control over.
I have already quoted to you both in that other thread the quotes from your Europhile God's on this subject of determinism.
@Burhan @Unstable
Do you see why I call this Europhile brain parasite when Somali's believe in this? I have debated a 100 polytheistic Europhile atheist and all of them just like their God's accepted there is no 'free will' only 'determinism' as per religious doctrines
these Somali blind sheeple are the only idiots that are arguing they have free will committing open heresy and apostasy I never seen before in these lunatic circles. take is easy on these people, brain parasite infestation is a painful thing, they are mentally ill and need proper care and treatment.