The curlicue on that 9 though lol
You are correct, as was my point but I also added something extra. Goedels incompleteness theorem proved that math is not fully true, or there are limitations on what math can say is true or not true about the system itself. To say it simply, you can't formalize math as universal. What you can do is to bracket consistent forms of fragments that can make each unit of mathematical subject to be specifically workable; if you try to put it all in one landscape then the inconsistency shows. That's why I am saying math is a language to something we correlate that indirectly corresponds with something. Or something like that.The answer to this question is a combination of both. Mathematics is a device of thought that is both invented and discovered. Mathematical objects such as numbers, equations, and theorems are defined and constructed by humans, but the factual truths that they contain are discovered by humans through careful observation and exploration of the world we live in..
It's understandable that the concept of energy and its origins can be confusing and thought-provoking. While physical energy is more tangible and easier to understand, non-physical energy can be more elusive and difficult to conceptualize.The only thing that stumps me into deep thinking n questioning is 'energy' since energy is needed for everything or else it would die. Their is physical energy and non-physical is what I gathered, and what I am interested in is the non-physical(electrical waves) for example and if that just existed always, imagine a 'tv' with no image but just a grainy output screen is that how the universe was just space-time n electrical waves? then the question is wats the source of that energy. They say energy cant be created or destroyed, so that means it just simply exists eternally.
I will do scratch my head over no 'common origin' points and things just existing without a cause, the only reason why im stumped with energy and unsure is 'its not physical' and only physical has a 'cause origin'. So non physical or invisible things is wat makes me think the most trying to follow a 'common origin direction'
It's understandable that the concept of energy and its origins can be confusing and thought-provoking. While physical energy is more tangible and easier to understand, non-physical energy can be more elusive and difficult to conceptualize.
Regarding the origins of non-physical energy, it's important to note that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be transformed from one form to another. The existence of non-physical energy, such as electrical waves or electromagnetic fields, can be attributed to the fundamental properties of the universe.
In modern physics, the universe is understood to have originated from a singular event known as the Big Bang. During this event, all matter and energy in the universe were created and began to expand and evolve into the universe we observe today. It's believed that the initial energy from the Big Bang continues to exist in the universe in various forms.
Additionally, the laws of physics, such as the conservation of energy, suggest that energy is an inherent property of the universe and always has been. The universe may have always existed in some form, and the non-physical energy we observe today could be a result of the fundamental properties of the universe that have existed since its inception.
Ultimately, the source of non-physical energy is still being explored and researched by physicists and scientists. However, it's important to remember that just because something is non-physical or invisible doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't have an origin or source. The universe is a complex and vast system, and there may be underlying principles and properties that contribute to the existence of non-physical energy.
You are correct that the Big Bang theory has evolved and expanded over time. The current understanding of the origins of the universe is based on the concept of cosmic inflation, which suggests that the universe underwent a period of rapid expansion in the moments immediately following the Big Bang. This period of inflation is thought to have lasted for a very short amount of time, during which the universe grew in size by a factor of at least 10^26.Big Bang is old now isn't it and replaced with a 'slow expansion but enough to generate heat' kind of like an 'oven' it slowly builds up heat, it doesn't just explode to 200 degrees. As for matter(planets, suns), didn't they come along much later when it was only space-time expanding in the black void n cooling off from the inital heat? did gravity originate at the initial singularity expansion or only when the sun n planets formed? to keep them from colliding