If you say no I want you to explain it without using religion
Chicken were dinosaurs not humansParts of it make sense but that doesn't mean it's entirely true.
It's a theory after all. For example, there's no doubt that species adopt to their environment.
But all of us coming from a fish that turned into a dinosaur that turned into a monkey is far fetched.
Didnt I say dont use religionNo matter how they try to explain things, their theory will end up falling apart because they are only using a series of contingent things to explain other contingent things.
A contingent thing is something that NEEDS something else to make it how it is. The whole universe we are in is contingent- this is what science assumes and how it works.
At the end, you come to the conclusion that there is a necessary being, that is independent and free of need. This necessary being is Allah, As Samad.
1.) The universe is contingent
2.) Every contingent thing depends on a necessary being to make it the way it is
3.) Therefore, the universe in its entirety depends on a necessary being to make it the way it is.
This is assuming we even take the arguments they pose seriously including the complete absence of what should be billions of 'transitional' forms. They also can't explain the Cambrian explosion and most recently scientists are withdrawing from their previous belief that 'neanderthals' were somehow not human the same way we are.
how did he use religion? he used philosophy. the mention of Allah, the Lord of the heavens and the earth, does not mean he was using religion.Didnt I say dont use religion
Honestly I am trying my best to not believe it, I made this thread solely for the reason to find a way to not believe in it, but there is just to many evidence.Evolution is a propaganda tool to legitimize racism as a black man why would you believe it?
I have a theory about Neanderthals’ origins. We know that an ice age occurred, and humans in Europe sought refuge in caves for protection. Inside these caves, with a small population, they interbred extensively, resulting in the birth of deformed babies. This is how Neanderthals were born.If you say no I want you to explain it without using religion
Who said Lions and cats are related I don't buy into the whole DNA stuff or all the modern science stuff.Honestly I am trying my best to not believe it, I made this thread solely for the reason to find a way to not believe in it, but there is just to many evidence.
I am pretty sure that we all can agree that cat, lion and tiger are somehow related which means they have a common ancestor a very long time ago. We can also agree that Wolfs and dogs look somehow related which means they have a common ancestor long ago. But why dont we believe in an animal who can stand like a human, has five toes and fingers, is one of the only animals that can show their expressions from their face, it has human like ears and has similar bone structure as us as having a common ancestor as us
They are all feline, this is their common ancestors bonesWho said Lions and cats are related I don't buy into the whole DNA stuff or all the modern science stuff.
I only named the necessary being. If you remove the name 'Allah', you still have the problems I stated. There is no getting around the existence of a necessary being.Didnt I say dont use religion
No. If humans evolved surely other mammals would have evolved to communicate similarly by now. None of the animals kingdom can match us humans in intellect and that fact is undisputed.If you say no I want you to explain it without using religion