Bro,I was resarching the same shit before.
It was waaay better when they were Rhodesia.
Also kicking out the White Rhodesians heavily impacted the amount of food in the country causing starvation in areas which was covered up by the government.
The same white people are importing the food to them.
How many African countries are actually doing better after colonization?
Namibia respects the Afrikaaners and the descendants of SΓΌdwestafrika.Rwanda and Namibia are doing okay
So you would rather be ruled by foreigners who exploit the native population? who gives a shit if they're poor at least they have their dignity.Mugabe single handedly destroyed Zimbabwe without much effort. Removing the white farmers and taking their lands as you mentioned was also retarded thing that Mugabe did.
Read this article. Its beyond hilarious
the order was simple become a white vassal state where whites have most of the country's wealth and blacks are house negros and/or peasantsYou ignore the fact that the west placed crippling sanctions on Zimbabwe when Mugabe began the land reforms. He did what was right when he kicked the white farmers out. Tell me, would you be ok with whites owning large amounts of lands in Somalia which they stole from the native population?
Here's the thing.You ignore the fact that the west placed crippling sanctions on Zimbabwe when Mugabe began the land reforms. He did what was right when he kicked the white farmers out. Tell me, would you be ok with whites owning large amounts of lands in Somalia which they stole from the native population?
The Whites were O.K. to be under black rule after the treaty.Were they not or still are under sanction, those devils destroy those people if it was for that, they would have accomplished at least something by now
No sxb.So you would rather be ruled by foreigners who exploit the native population? who gives a shit if they're poor at least they have their dignity.
white colonizers came through gumeysi the land should be cleansed of themHave some sympathy.
The Whites were O.K. to be under black rule after the treaty.
So for e.g. if you were born in Zimabwean and identify as a Zimbabwean can't you own land or run for MP because of the colour of your skin?
FEED US SHITE SAVIOURThe new Zimbabwean Gov't is allowing White Zimbabwean Farmers to return to their lands:
Article: White Zimbabwean farmer returns to seized land
How many African countries are actually doing better after colonization?
That's what I support sxb.Many are doing well, and many were on the path to being prosperous before westerners came in and destroyed them.
North africa (except for Libya and tunisia) is doing alright. Nigeria is quite rich but they have a bad corruption problem, same thing with alot of other nations. Tanzania is also doing very well at the moment. You may have noticed that french speaking african nations are the most impoverished, this is because they are still under french rule. France has been and is still exploiting the African continent, and they are not the only ones engaging in these practices.
YES YES BUT HE ALSO WAS A TYRANT WHO DID NOT KNOW HOW TO RUN A COUNTRYYou ignore the fact that the west placed crippling sanctions on Zimbabwe when Mugabe began the land reforms. He did what was right when he kicked the white farmers out. Tell me, would you be ok with whites owning large amounts of lands in Somalia which they stole from the native population?