It was also fact they were arabs! Until DNA testing came out and proved them to be mostly Habesha/indian/bantu/persian hybrids with arab dna rarely exceeding 20% lmao. Lets face it a lot of oral history surrounding the origin of clans are highly exagerrated, not in the way she was thinking though
Yh, you canβt be taken seriously. Theyβre not habesha at all. 23 and me cannot process mixed Somali with Arab hence processes that as Habesha as Habeshaβs are basically like Somalis with elevated Arab genetics.
This is basic. Go to the culture and history section. I knew you were a clown indeed.
I know I said my previous post would be the last one here, but I want to clarify
The year is 2024, your folk legends of how cadcads came into existence don't matter anymore. We have genetic testing, we can trace your DNA over 150k+ years, we know for a fact cadcads are not maternally Somali. I don't care what they say. I don't care what you say. Blood over words.
Only a small minority of the testing shows Somali haplogroups, furthermore, these traders came after Islam during the medieval and even post 1500s. It isnβt long ago for Somalis to not know the history of Cadcads and Xamar. Get out of here. It is well known that traders of Persian, Arab and Uzbek backgrounds came to Somalia and were clients of the Ajuraan. This is established.
Daroods and Hawiyes were once thought of to have different origins, and now with the advent of genetic testing, we both know we are descended from the same man from 600BC. Generally speaking, both sides accepted this and now it's common knowledge that Somalis descend from the same people
Youβre telling me things I know that are irrevelent to the conversation. Cadcads are a new group and arenβt shrouded in mystery the way the origins of Somalis are.
If you seriously bring up "Muh oral history" in the year 2024 and use it as an argument to combat genetic testing, you may have a mental deficiency.
We literally have testing that shows this as well. DNA testing also show that Carab Salah originate from a Mehri patriarch, but still you side step this issue.
They were otherized because they were of foreign race, that simple. They looked different, so we naturally treated them different. thats how it
Youβre contradicting yourself. You literally said theyβre of Somali origin as in they have a Somali patriarch. Please make sense. We know they were of foreign origin and thatβs precisely my point. But on average they have between 20 to 40% Somali DNA.
nearly half of Black americans share paternal origins with white americans (due to slave masters having children with female slaves) yet they were still lynched for 200 years. whats your point?
Again, how is that relevant to our point? Weβre talking about a minority group within Somalis who do have Somali DNA and lot of it is maternal.
"Muzaffarids" were ethnic Somali lol. The idea of them being persian is pure bullshit historical revisionism that arrived in the mid 1900s after some italian historian made the connection between a Somali ruler with the added title of Muzzafarid, a persian dynasty thousands of km away. and Subsequent "Muzzafarids" didn't even call themselves that. they were just Somalis. Marco Polo and Ibn Battuta both confirmed that the "Muzafarrids" were somali during their reign. can't be bothered to go into this but if you're on the somali side of history twitter you'd know. ask around here on the history if you want more clarification.
Ibn Batuta was around in the medieval period. This group were around in the 1500s during the time in which they were clients to the Ajuuran.