Would you rather revive Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein?

[Internet Nomad]

Gaddafi

Versus

Saddam Hussein​

 

[Internet Nomad]

Added point: both would be revived with their countries at their peak.

 

[Omar del Sur]

I believe Saddam is the objectively correct answer. Gaddafi had this weird thing of promoting Shi'ism.

 

[GaradShabeel]

Where's the option for 'neither' in the vote?

 

[lahaine]

Saddam Hussein is the right answer man fought against Shia Iran, imperialist America, Zionist Israel and communism

 

[Periplus]

Neither, both were retarded.

 

[Internet Nomad]

Neither, both were retarded.

Honest reaction​

 

[Internet Nomad]

I believe Saddam is the objectively correct answer. Gaddafi had this weird thing of promoting Shi'ism.

maybe I am biased but I feel like Gaddafi had a certain je ne sais quoi feeling about him. He was also avant garde with his plans for Africa.

 

[Internet Nomad]

Also gaddafi had drip

 

[Aurelian]

Gaddafi
View attachment 307625

Versus

Saddam Hussein​

View attachment 307627

they both were brutal dictators, reviving any of them will not make any good. Failed states usually miss their brutal corrupt overlord because they couldn't anything better after overthrowing him. Which is pathetic.

 

[Mayor]

maybe I am biased but I feel like Gaddafi had a certain je ne sais quoi feeling about him. He was also avant garde with his plans for Africa.

Ghaddafi was a moron bro. Libya is top 10 in the world for proven oil reserves and it has a small population. They should’ve been rich and developed like the Khaleeji countries

Instead of financing wars and invaliding neighboring countries like Chad, he should’ve developed his country. Libya should’ve been the most developed country in the Muslim world. Instead it turned into a failed state riddled with conflict

Saddam wasn’t good either, but he was MUCH better than Ghaddafi. Iraq at one point was the strongest country in the Middle East

Unlike dumbass Ghaddafi it took a full on invasion and 2 other wars to overthrow Saddam. Whereas Ghaddafi was toppled by CIA rebels

 

[Periplus]

Tbh Gaddafi was the Mozart of dictators.

He took over Libya in his twenties, he was younger than many SSpot users lmao.

Imagine a 27 year old going to Gamal Abdel Nasser and lecturing him on Pan-Arabism.

 

[Kizaru]

Gaddafi. Saddam killed his own people

 

[World]

I don't know what crimes Gaddafi did, but I know Saddam committed genocide against Kurds so im gonna revive gaddafi.

 

[reer]

Ghaddafi was a moron bro. Libya is top 10 in the world for proven oil reserves and it has a small population. They should’ve been rich and developed like the Khaleeji countries

Instead of financing wars and invaliding neighboring countries like Chad, he should’ve developed his country. Libya should’ve been the most developed country in the Muslim world. Instead it turned into a failed state riddled with conflict

Saddam wasn’t good either, but he was MUCH better than Ghaddafi. Iraq at one point was the strongest country in the Middle East

Unlike dumbass Ghaddafi it took a full on invasion and 2 other wars to overthrow Saddam. Whereas Ghaddafi was toppled by CIA rebels

saddam brutal ruthless and also highly competent. he ran a sectarian country. managed to have an army that defeated local rebellions and could repel iran. while not suffering a military coup. he kept the shia threat at bay.

 

[Nin123]

Gaddafi
View attachment 307625

Versus

Saddam Hussein​

View attachment 307627

Gaddafi supplied weapons to Al shabaab so no to this terrorist

 

[mrlog]

Gaddafi
View attachment 307625

Versus

Saddam Hussein​

View attachment 307627

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[Mayor]

saddam brutal ruthless and also highly competent. he ran a sectarian country. managed to have an army that defeated local rebellions and could repel iran. while not suffering a military coup. he kept the shia threat at bay.

Exactly. Both were brutal but at least Saddam was competent

Ghaddafi had much fewer obstacles to overcome, yet Saddam was far more successful as a leader

Ghaddafi was lunatic fit for a comedy movie. He is no way comparable to Saddam

 

[Khaemwaset]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

I respect the xoog of the xaarbash but bro's foreign policy was like a socially awkward kid in school. By the time he invaded ethiopia he had no real allies and support. If he just spent some time building relationships he could've gotten international support and the victory would be so macaan every Somali would be creaming thinking about the March to Abyssinia.

Ethiopia was fucked even back then even more so, his timing was good and his invasion successful at first. All he needed was to build international support through a few years of building relations with other states and he would've went down as the greatest Somali leader. But alas he went a bit crazy and decided to bomb isaaq and all the other stuff.

 

[Internet Nomad]

I respect the xoog of the xaarbash but bro's foreign policy was like a socially awkward kid in school. By the time he invaded ethiopia he had no real allies and support. If he just spent some time building relationships he could've gotten international support and the victory would be so macaan every Somali would be creaming thinking about the March to Abyssinia.

Ethiopia was fucked even back then even more so, his timing was good and his invasion successful at first. All he needed was to build international support through a few years of building relations with other states and he would've went down as the greatest Somali leader. But alas he went a bit crazy and decided to bomb isaaq and all the other stuff.

Also a jaw so weak it would be a struggle for him to fold a towel.