"Women are Inferior"- Darwin's Theory

[VixR]

You seem to have misunderstood his point. He isn't saying that it makes Darwin less credible, just that the supporter he was arguing with is ignorant of what she's admiring. Though it actually does make it less credible. Unless you think women are lesser, intelligence wise, than men?

Well, I wasn't ignorant of him. And I still admire him for being able to put forth his discoveries, however flawed are some, in print, to reproducible verification.

Does that confuse you or are you an absolutist?

 

[Somali psycho]

I don't think you even needed a research to prove this, it's self-evident

 

[anonymous34]

Say wallah she is cute, i don't believe you she said herself she has a tranny and has a penis

I've heard she is pretty too

 

[Starscream]

Say wallah she is cute, i don't believe you she said herself she has a tranny and has a penis

Yes because everything women say is true

1. I am a tranny.

2. I am not light skinned.

Are you still pretending your not her

 

[random12345]

Well, I wasn't ignorant of him. And I still admire him for being able to put forth his discoveries, however flawed are some, in print, to reproducible verification.

Does that confuse you or are you an absolutist?

 

[Yonis]

1. I am a tranny.

2. I am not light skinned.

lmao i bet you're one of those michelle obama looking trannies

 

[Inquisitive_]

What's your angle? Reaching the cusp of truth on a remarkable subject doesn't make one a god on everything, quite unlike in religion where every nonverifiable and/or fantastical uttering is considered not just truth, but the holy truth. In the times of C.Darwin, a woman was liable to be his property just as were the non-White men and women whom he deemed inferior. This does not render his work any less incredible. If your hope is that every great discovery came to the hands of a literally lily-white, perfect being to the point of deification such as you've actually already done with him, predicteably, you will continue to be disappointed, bc unlike the so-called prophets of religion, no one in the general field of science, nor the scientists in question themselves are considered to be divinely motivated, but instead deserve due recognition and praise for all their verifiable contributions.

Again you missed the entire point, this wasn't a rant over a coffee or something he wrote in his diary, nor was it a mere utterance during a voodo occult ritual.

This was part of his theory of natural selection and evolution, he used that theory to argue your inferiority and since your not just an ordinary white women which he made equivalent to the 'male negro', your futo dhuxool blackness is even worse in intellect and development, you rank the lowest of the low as a black women according to occultic Darwin, even the white-women and male-negro is smarter then you are. He is not alone in this, this continued until the 19th century were all his students used the same quackademic theories including many other scientists from all disciplines.

There is no running away from this fact, the arguments he brought are absolutely valid and relevant IF you hold the theory to be true, which I don't but you do!

Give us your take why you refuse to accept this part of his natural selection/evolution argument but yet accept everything else? what method do you use to differentiate your acceptance or rejection? or is this just a case of blind conformity ?

 

[VixR]

You dismiss this rather easily don't you. This isn't some unconnected niche ideology; he theorised this using the same process/methods he used for his other wacky ideas.

You say we evolved from primates; I say Negros are an inferior less evolved sub-race, and the both of us can use the same source to back those statements up.

"Get your uppity ass in the fucking kitchen you uncivilized wench".
Charlie 'Top Dog' Darwin (probably)

So you think that bc some of his postulations and opinions are flawed, his entire work should be upended on that basis?

 

[Reign]

Yes because everything women say is true


Are you still pretending your not her

Many users on here can confirm that I am indeed a tranny.

lmao i bet you're one of those michelle obama looking trannies

I think I look a little more feminine than Michelle O considering I am an ex Somali man and they're known to have softer features compared to AA men.

 

[SuldaanGuled]

@Inquisitive_ sxb

What surprises me the most is how quickly the proponents of the theory try to downplay the relation between the theory and it's implications regarding race. Scientific racism was an established doctrine all throughout europe and it was used to justify all manners of injustice done by the europeans. Darwin's theory definitely gave support to that doctrine at that time but now we've people trying to argue the opposite.

 

[DrippinglyWet]

Many users on here can confirm that I am indeed a tranny.

I think I look a little more feminine than Michelle O considering I am an ex Somali male and they're known to have softer features compared to AA men.

Do you take hormone pills ?

 

[Yonis]

Many users on here can confirm that I am indeed a tranny.

I think I look a little more feminine than Michelle O considering I am an ex Somali man and they're known to have softer features compared to AA men.

 

[Reign]

Do you take hormone pills ?

Honestly you keep asking me silly questions. It's 2017 babe, get your head out the gutter.

 

[Rorschach]

So you think that bc some of his postulations and opinions are flawed, his entire work should be upended on that basis?

Not really. It just strengthens our argument that he's liar, since we don't believe that any of his theories have been scientifically proven (playing jigsaw puzzles with bones of different species doesn't count). To us both the 'evolution from primates' theory and the racist/sexist theories are one and the same - unproven malarkey with circumstantial evidence. The difference is, one has fallen out of favour recently.

I understand the argument that even the devil has the capacity to speak the truth. If you believe evolution to be true, the argument in this thread alone can't sway you logically. Nothing wrong with pissing on one of your prophets though .

 

[DrippinglyWet]

Honestly you keep asking me silly questions. It's 2017 babe, get your head out the gutter.

Answer the question warya/nayaa!

 

[Starscream]

Many users on here can confirm that I am indeed a tranny.

I think I look a little more feminine than Michelle O considering I am an ex Somali man and they're known to have softer features compared to AA men.

Ok post your pic honey

 

[Rorschach]

@Reign @Guysensei @Starscream

Interrogate it in a separate luuq. Stop derailing this thread.

 

[VixR]

Again you missed the entire point, this wasn't a rant over a coffee or something he wrote in his diary, nor was it a mere utterance during a voodo occult ritual.

This was part of his theory of natural selection and evolution, he used that theory to argue your inferiority and since your not just an ordinary white women which he made equivalent to the 'male negro', your futo dhuxool blackness is even worse in intellect and development, you rank the lowest of the low as a black women according to occultic Darwin, even the white-women and male-negro is smarter then you are. He is not alone in this, this continued until the 19th century using his theories.

There is no running away from this fact, the arguments he brought are absolutely valid and relevant IF you hold the theory to be true, which I don't but you do!

Give us your take what you refuse to accept this part of his natural selection/evolution argument but yet accept everything else? what method do you use to differentiate your acceptance or rejection? or is this just a case of blind conformity ?

Reproducibility, repeatability, evidence, verification, whatever you want to call it. It's anything but a case of blind conformity. There's nothing the scientific process doesn't account for. In science, you accept the evidence and reject the fiction in postulation regardless of the person behind the discovery. We know black people aren't a subrace and we know the complexities of intelligence, and that the average man is no more intelligent than the average woman. Your quotes on him regarding women or what have you don't automatically discredit natural selection, unfortunately for you.

 

[Starscream]

@Reign @Guysensei @Starscream

Interrogate it in a separate luuq. Stop derailing this thread.

This is 2 threads in one what not to like besides I can't even use the pm function

 

[Genie]

hmmm, for some reason i see where old Darwin was coming from he states that if we were to analyse the men and women in poetry , sciences , physics (including quantum), engineering , mechanics , mathematics , computer science and medicine and put them in to categorise of each sector and which gender dominates it , you will find that even today men dominate a LOT of these sectors , concluding that he could be on to something however i don't allude to the idea that women are dumb because we aren't.

Women for the most part enjoy beauty (modelling is dominated by women) , and or compassionate jobs such as nurses (again dominated by women) Women simply have no interest in STEM the government spends money to try and appeal to women into doing STEM its laughable to be honest. I think we have differences , but what men dominate and do in even todays society makes the most impact , and that was the point he was making or at least thats what i perceived.

NOTE: i don't agree with all of what he said just the statement of "if we were to analyse...." yada yada and how it still applies today. Nothing more , nothing less .