Mr. Pitt was a brilliant man. At 24 he became a prime minister by naked and machination of ambitions. All the aristocratic women of the time were hunting him down because he was a famous bachelor man. The woman who got him-- how lucky she is was the usual jargon. By all account there is countless of testimony of his character. For sure he was manly, masculine, conservative. But he was also lonely- and preferred male company to women. He never Shukaansied a woman. Every woman who meets him, falls in love with him. So much that there was a public rejection. A certain Eleanor Auckland fell for him, and her dad had to intervene. Please marry my daughter-Sir, she loves you- the poor dad publicly avowed. But poor Mr. Pitt had to write a long dreary letter about "obstacles' in his way to marry her or any woman. This piqued my interest.
He is GAY?
So-u can imagine me. I searched, digged, stuck my head in a hole digging- while my tail wagged --hopelessly wondering will i ever find an incriminating clue? Evidence? Nada. Nothing. Yes, the press, made fun of his virginity but it was always, hinted respectfully, and never directly insulted as his character was stainless. He was most definitely a mama's boy. Very kind to his mother. (a very STRONG clue # 1 he was GAY) He was also alcoholic poor fellow. He was a sickly child, and at the tender of age of teenage he began to drink at the instruction of his doctor. When he died at age 46- his liver or his internal organs looked like he was 80. Obviously the stress of being a leader and his alcoholic nature finally caught up to him. So back to my question:
Was he GAY?
I really cannot answer with an affirmative : YES. Was he biologically GAY? I would say YES. How do i come to this conclusion? He died a Virgin. Simple as that, this is Clue # 2. He had a niece, her name is Lady Hester Stanhope. Clue # 3. She was a famous world traveler in the Middle east - sort of like the Lawrence of Arabia- Female version. To me-- the existence of this masculine volatile relative woman, no doubt a lesbian- is my proof; Especially that they were very close to each other. She lived with him, and was the mistress of his home/office for more than five years. Pitt was biologically gay. Because these traits run in the family tree or DNA. Find a gay boy in a family- pick up your torch , there is a butch lesbian in the family corner, hiding or not hiding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Hester_Stanhope
Conclusions: Was He Gay? Biologically yes. Was he 0% attracted to women. Yes, Clue #4! That is for sure. So i guess by deduction-- he was not sexually attracted to women, then he must have been attracted to men. or Asexual Maybe? Do they exist? Yes. Those days- the concept of Homosexuality identity was not an option. Its like todays Pedophilia. Not an option, but it does not mean- it does not exist-maybe in the fringes of darkness, and extreme secrecy.
If he was not GAY- then he must have be a Labeed. U know those binary people with two sex organs at the same time. A little barely visible pee pee sticking out of a vagina. That will explain a whole lot of my frustrations. But it is unlikely as the man drunk a lot with his boys- and am sure in a drunkard stupid state, he was caught more than once standing with his buddies--& urinating in public. But here is the deal though, there is no written accounts of him urinating in the public or causing disturbances. He was home schooled too, due to being a sickly child. But his sovereign prince George was caught many times urinating in his dunked state!
Overall: Why did i make this tedious long post that Somali spot users poor undeveloped brains will hurt & cannot comprehend? I really can't answer you that, except that it feels good to get it out of my chest.!
Thank you!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Pitt_the_Younger
He is GAY?
So-u can imagine me. I searched, digged, stuck my head in a hole digging- while my tail wagged --hopelessly wondering will i ever find an incriminating clue? Evidence? Nada. Nothing. Yes, the press, made fun of his virginity but it was always, hinted respectfully, and never directly insulted as his character was stainless. He was most definitely a mama's boy. Very kind to his mother. (a very STRONG clue # 1 he was GAY) He was also alcoholic poor fellow. He was a sickly child, and at the tender of age of teenage he began to drink at the instruction of his doctor. When he died at age 46- his liver or his internal organs looked like he was 80. Obviously the stress of being a leader and his alcoholic nature finally caught up to him. So back to my question:
Was he GAY?
I really cannot answer with an affirmative : YES. Was he biologically GAY? I would say YES. How do i come to this conclusion? He died a Virgin. Simple as that, this is Clue # 2. He had a niece, her name is Lady Hester Stanhope. Clue # 3. She was a famous world traveler in the Middle east - sort of like the Lawrence of Arabia- Female version. To me-- the existence of this masculine volatile relative woman, no doubt a lesbian- is my proof; Especially that they were very close to each other. She lived with him, and was the mistress of his home/office for more than five years. Pitt was biologically gay. Because these traits run in the family tree or DNA. Find a gay boy in a family- pick up your torch , there is a butch lesbian in the family corner, hiding or not hiding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Hester_Stanhope
Conclusions: Was He Gay? Biologically yes. Was he 0% attracted to women. Yes, Clue #4! That is for sure. So i guess by deduction-- he was not sexually attracted to women, then he must have been attracted to men. or Asexual Maybe? Do they exist? Yes. Those days- the concept of Homosexuality identity was not an option. Its like todays Pedophilia. Not an option, but it does not mean- it does not exist-maybe in the fringes of darkness, and extreme secrecy.
If he was not GAY- then he must have be a Labeed. U know those binary people with two sex organs at the same time. A little barely visible pee pee sticking out of a vagina. That will explain a whole lot of my frustrations. But it is unlikely as the man drunk a lot with his boys- and am sure in a drunkard stupid state, he was caught more than once standing with his buddies--& urinating in public. But here is the deal though, there is no written accounts of him urinating in the public or causing disturbances. He was home schooled too, due to being a sickly child. But his sovereign prince George was caught many times urinating in his dunked state!
Overall: Why did i make this tedious long post that Somali spot users poor undeveloped brains will hurt & cannot comprehend? I really can't answer you that, except that it feels good to get it out of my chest.!
Thank you!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Pitt_the_Younger
Last edited:
.
