Why Remigration from Europe is not possible

[chronic]

Just saw this video, thoughts?

 

[The alchemist]

This was Europe in Mediaval Age:

Ain't nothing new.

 

[chronic]

This was Europe in Mediaval Age:
View attachment 315666

Ain't nothing new.

We’re in modern times, now nations have defined borders and movement can be largely be restricted

 

[Khaem]

Just saw this video, thoughts?

That channel Is not something you want to gain an understanding of a topic from

 

[El Nino]

Le based europeans lol, nothing will happen. If the massive refugee/emigration wave from 2015-2019 did not start anything, then nothing will. Immigrants will assimilate in the future. Half of the dhegacas guys who came into the country I live are married to white woman, same with other africans. Only evidence europeans will have of the massive immigration will be by Y-dna and mtdna haplogroups in the future.

 

[chronic]

That channel Is not something you want to gain an understanding of a topic from

How so?

 

[Khaem]

How so?

As the other user said, He's typical "Based/Save EVROPA" kid you see. Sadly the alt history and this type of content have been hijacked by them since covid years.

It's a cycle jerk of cadaan teens who think they're crusaders and I see crazy theories from them like "western civilisation is going to assimilate humanity and create a peaceful world order"

Immigration is only effecting the population of the top 4~ major cities. In the suburbs and country is all cadaan. All these new gens are being assimilated like crazy and within the end of the century you will barley notice the impact of immigration from 2011-2019.

The only exception is France who put their immigrants into ethnic ghettos for generations and demonise the Muslim North Africans and West Africans there. Then get surprised when those young men who grew up like that end up hating everything to do with France and their state enforced atheism and turn to Islam instead of giving up to the state.

 

[Fobnimo Till I Dhimo]

The comment section is filled with theories like this


'' If my theory is correct and that it is foremost banking that determined migration, then all European countries will commence with deportations almost at the same time, since all of their economies are so interconnected with one another. That would mean a deportation list of 40-50 million people from Europe alone. The 3rd world would be completely unable to handle this massive wave of forcefully deported people returning home. Two factors that makes this worse. The majority of all food is produced by European farmers. No joke, look at the top producers and where food exports come from, it's all from European farms in Russia, USA, Canada, Argentina, France, Ukraine, Australia and more. If Europe enters a deep recession, or let's say have problems producing food, then what disappears first are European food exports to the third world. Second factor, much of the 3rd world is running out of water. 2 billion people have deep underground aquifers as their primary source of water, but this is finite, and once it is used, it's gone forever. All of North Africa and the Middle East have already used most of their water and they probably only have another 20-30 years left before it's completely gone. In that case, the Middle East can no longer sustain a population of 500 million, and will see a population reduction of perhaps 75%. So these migrants, if they are forcefully deported to the third world will likely see those countries have widespread famines and societal collapse. Deportation may likely lead to their deaths. Is this preferable? Maybe, staying in Europe won't be an option if the Europeans want homogeneity again (and are willing to get violent about it).''

 

[Khaem]

The comment section is filled with theories like this


'' If my theory is correct and that it is foremost banking that determined migration, then all European countries will commence with deportations almost at the same time, since all of their economies are so interconnected with one another. That would mean a deportation list of 40-50 million people from Europe alone. The 3rd world would be completely unable to handle this massive wave of forcefully deported people returning home. Two factors that makes this worse. The majority of all food is produced by European farmers. No joke, look at the top producers and where food exports come from, it's all from European farms in Russia, USA, Canada, Argentina, France, Ukraine, Australia and more. If Europe enters a deep recession, or let's say have problems producing food, then what disappears first are European food exports to the third world. Second factor, much of the 3rd world is running out of water. 2 billion people have deep underground aquifers as their primary source of water, but this is finite, and once it is used, it's gone forever. All of North Africa and the Middle East have already used most of their water and they probably only have another 20-30 years left before it's completely gone. In that case, the Middle East can no longer sustain a population of 500 million, and will see a population reduction of perhaps 75%. So these migrants, if they are forcefully deported to the third world will likely see those countries have widespread famines and societal collapse. Deportation may likely lead to their deaths. Is this preferable? Maybe, staying in Europe won't be an option if the Europeans want homogeneity again (and are willing to get violent about it).''

Refer to what I mentioned earlier. These are all pseudo intellectuals. Reminds me of IM Lewis tbh.

 

[The alchemist]

We’re in modern times, now nations have defined borders and movement can be largely be restricted

Are you in such a lack of knowledge that you think throwing the word "modern times" explains away human and environmental forces while pretending territorial exertions is a "modern" concept, utterly ignoring reality itself, ignorant of a salient enduring trait of humanity? This was a condition since the Stone Age, and these silly "modern times" quotes are vapid terms with zero explanatory depth, for they are only markers of Western ideology. Heck, "modern" borders have changed so much in the last two centuries in Europe. If a war happened in "Western Europe" "territorial demarcations would change, and people would convulsively migrate. "Modern times," a term lacking any context bearing scholarly meaning, does not fossilize what has always been, persists today, and will be tomorrow.

Watching a foolish YouTube video is not a proxy for education or rational sense-making. That is clear.

 

[JustSomeGuy]

As the other user said, He's typical "Based/Save EVROPA" kid you see. Sadly the alt history and this type of content have been hijacked by them since covid years.

It's a cycle jerk of cadaan teens who think they're crusaders and I see crazy theories from them like "western civilisation is going to assimilate humanity and create a peaceful world order"

Immigration is only effecting the population of the top 4~ major cities. In the suburbs and country is all cadaan. All these new gens are being assimilated like crazy and within the end of the century you will barley notice the impact of immigration from 2011-2019.

The only exception is France who put their immigrants into ethnic ghettos for generations and demonise the Muslim North Africans and West Africans there. Then get surprised when those young men who grew up like that end up hating everything to do with France and their state enforced atheism and turn to Islam instead of giving up to the state.

One of the reasons why I do not believe that the anti-Islam propaganda in Western countries is a bad thing. How many irreligious North Africans have turned back to Islam because of the way that their European country has treated them? Must be countless examples.