DISCLAIMER: This is an academic criticism of the LGBT ideology. It is NOT hate speech against any person or group Even pro-gay academics like John Corvino & Lisa Waldner encourage criticism against LGBT instead of slanderously dismissing it as "bigotry"
https://www.johncorvino.com/2009/05/01/gay-marriage-and-the-bigot-card/
The primary and most rational reason is because God has forbidden homosexuality and made it a sin Morally it is objectively wrong, and Allah has made it haram P.S: and if your wondering, yes God exists and Islam is true, but that is another topic
But this is a very easy way to refute LGBT using moral philosophy So as a secondary reason, I will address every pro-LGBT argument & show how they are logically inconsistent P.S: secular liberalism also has no objective morals (but another topic tbh)
LGBT claims #
: "Love is love" + "It's consensual" + "It doesn't affect you" By this logic, pedosexuality & zoosexuality would be allowed If a 5 year old and a 25 year old (or a man and his pet dog) genuinely loved each other, this reasoning would permit their relationship
A LGBT response to this might be "children and animals can't consent" Which is of course wrong, pro-LGBT atheist philosophers like Peter Singer and David Benatar have shown that animals and children can consent Sources: a)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
b)
https://www.jstor.org
A LGBT response to this : "They cannot give *informed* consent" This is true, people who have limited cognition cannot give informed consent, like children, intoxicated adults, and mentally ill people
However, this would mean homosexuals cannot give informed consent Dr. Robert Kinney states that the desire to engage in anal sex is no different than the desire to eat plastic for enjoyment, both of which can be labeled a cognitive defect Source:
https://journals.sagepub.com
Informed consent also contradicts LGBT since they don't inform people that this lifestyle causes higher rates of abuse Pro-LGBT scientist Lisa Waldner says this domestic abuse in the LGBT community is censored due to insecurity of "inferiority" Source:
https://www.sciencedirect.com
The LGBT also does not inform society that this ideology has higher rates of promiscuity & large sexual networks This results in the creation & spread of antibiotic resistant super-STDs Sources: a)
https://repository.library.georgetown.edu
b)
https://www.tandfonline.com
c)
https://www.acpjournals.org
This affects wider society, our public health, as well as waste medical resources on easily preventable diseases Imagine there was a behavior that created new strains of vaccine-resistant super-coronavirus, should that behavior be a human right? Source:
http://annals.org
Variations of this argument may include: ~ "they have the right to sexual satisfaction/happiness" ~ "they can't choose who they love" But they all would permit Pedosexuals/Zoosexuals as well, & an even bigger problem if someone identified as "Rapesexual"
Kate Millet, a renown LGBT activist, lesbian & atheist, stated that the patriarchy was preventing the sexualization of children She described "age of consent" laws as "very oppressive" to gay male youth Source:
https://ipce.info
Pro-LGBT gay academic Jesse Bering says it's hypocritical for LGBT to shun Zoophiles & Pedophiles LGBs have more in common with Zs (Zoosexuals) & Ps (Pedosexuals) than they do with Ts Any reasoning that defends LGBT also can be used to defends Zs & Ps
https://ethics.org.au
LGBT Claim #
: "Science say LGBT is normal & not a mental disorder" The truth here is that like many politically controversial fields with many conflicting results Pro-LGBT scientist Lisa Waldner says data that makes LGBT look bad is censored Source:
https://www.sciencedirect.com
The same line of reasoning/logic that the APA used to depathologize LGBT to claim they are normal, can also be used to depathologize all other psychological disorders as well as crimes (including major felonies), & claim they are normal behavior Source:
https://journals.sagepub.com
A controversial study found that children raised by non-heterosexual parents are more likely to be sexually abused by their parents, be raped, get an STD, do various drugs, commit crime, get depression, commit suicide, and end up non-heterosexual Source:
https://www.sciencedirect.com
A pro-LGBT paper (Cheng and Powell 2015) criticized it But the criticism itself was criticized for not reporting effect sizes and thus losing statistical significance Not only that but many pro-LGBT papers did not follow the APA's own standards Source:
https://journals.sagepub.com
LGBT Claim #
: "Biological sex and gender are not the same thing" This is false, 1st it fails on philosophical grounds and no argument for sex/gender distinction make any logical sense Source:
https://link.springer.com
Using multi variate analysis you can accurately determine someone's biological sex using just their brain mosaic Brains can be classified into two groups, male and female Sources: a)
https://pnas.org
b)
https://pnas.org
c)
https://pnas.org
Artificial Intelligence can tell people’s biological gender from just their brain’s gray matter volume and brain rhythms with over 93% accuracy Sources: a)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
b)
We have excellent skills to extract sex from visual assessment of human faces, but assessing sex fro
https://www.nature.com
Another study found that the brains of transsexuals are distinct from heterosexual males and females In other words from just their brains you can determine that they are a transsexual and what their biological sex is Source:
The present review focuses on the brain structure of male-to-female (MtF) and female-to-male (FtM) h
https://link.springer.com
https://www.johncorvino.com/2009/05/01/gay-marriage-and-the-bigot-card/
The primary and most rational reason is because God has forbidden homosexuality and made it a sin Morally it is objectively wrong, and Allah has made it haram P.S: and if your wondering, yes God exists and Islam is true, but that is another topic
But this is a very easy way to refute LGBT using moral philosophy So as a secondary reason, I will address every pro-LGBT argument & show how they are logically inconsistent P.S: secular liberalism also has no objective morals (but another topic tbh)
LGBT claims #
: "Love is love" + "It's consensual" + "It doesn't affect you" By this logic, pedosexuality & zoosexuality would be allowed If a 5 year old and a 25 year old (or a man and his pet dog) genuinely loved each other, this reasoning would permit their relationshipA LGBT response to this might be "children and animals can't consent" Which is of course wrong, pro-LGBT atheist philosophers like Peter Singer and David Benatar have shown that animals and children can consent Sources: a)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
b)
https://www.jstor.org
A LGBT response to this : "They cannot give *informed* consent" This is true, people who have limited cognition cannot give informed consent, like children, intoxicated adults, and mentally ill people
However, this would mean homosexuals cannot give informed consent Dr. Robert Kinney states that the desire to engage in anal sex is no different than the desire to eat plastic for enjoyment, both of which can be labeled a cognitive defect Source:
https://journals.sagepub.com
Informed consent also contradicts LGBT since they don't inform people that this lifestyle causes higher rates of abuse Pro-LGBT scientist Lisa Waldner says this domestic abuse in the LGBT community is censored due to insecurity of "inferiority" Source:
https://www.sciencedirect.com
The LGBT also does not inform society that this ideology has higher rates of promiscuity & large sexual networks This results in the creation & spread of antibiotic resistant super-STDs Sources: a)
https://repository.library.georgetown.edu
b)
https://www.tandfonline.com
c)
https://www.acpjournals.org
This affects wider society, our public health, as well as waste medical resources on easily preventable diseases Imagine there was a behavior that created new strains of vaccine-resistant super-coronavirus, should that behavior be a human right? Source:
http://annals.org
Variations of this argument may include: ~ "they have the right to sexual satisfaction/happiness" ~ "they can't choose who they love" But they all would permit Pedosexuals/Zoosexuals as well, & an even bigger problem if someone identified as "Rapesexual"
Kate Millet, a renown LGBT activist, lesbian & atheist, stated that the patriarchy was preventing the sexualization of children She described "age of consent" laws as "very oppressive" to gay male youth Source:
https://ipce.info
Pro-LGBT gay academic Jesse Bering says it's hypocritical for LGBT to shun Zoophiles & Pedophiles LGBs have more in common with Zs (Zoosexuals) & Ps (Pedosexuals) than they do with Ts Any reasoning that defends LGBT also can be used to defends Zs & Ps
https://ethics.org.au
LGBT Claim #
: "Science say LGBT is normal & not a mental disorder" The truth here is that like many politically controversial fields with many conflicting results Pro-LGBT scientist Lisa Waldner says data that makes LGBT look bad is censored Source:https://www.sciencedirect.com
The same line of reasoning/logic that the APA used to depathologize LGBT to claim they are normal, can also be used to depathologize all other psychological disorders as well as crimes (including major felonies), & claim they are normal behavior Source:
https://journals.sagepub.com
A controversial study found that children raised by non-heterosexual parents are more likely to be sexually abused by their parents, be raped, get an STD, do various drugs, commit crime, get depression, commit suicide, and end up non-heterosexual Source:
https://www.sciencedirect.com
A pro-LGBT paper (Cheng and Powell 2015) criticized it But the criticism itself was criticized for not reporting effect sizes and thus losing statistical significance Not only that but many pro-LGBT papers did not follow the APA's own standards Source:
https://journals.sagepub.com
LGBT Claim #
: "Biological sex and gender are not the same thing" This is false, 1st it fails on philosophical grounds and no argument for sex/gender distinction make any logical sense Source:https://link.springer.com
Using multi variate analysis you can accurately determine someone's biological sex using just their brain mosaic Brains can be classified into two groups, male and female Sources: a)
https://pnas.org
b)
https://pnas.org
c)
https://pnas.org
Artificial Intelligence can tell people’s biological gender from just their brain’s gray matter volume and brain rhythms with over 93% accuracy Sources: a)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
b)
We have excellent skills to extract sex from visual assessment of human faces, but assessing sex fro
https://www.nature.com
Another study found that the brains of transsexuals are distinct from heterosexual males and females In other words from just their brains you can determine that they are a transsexual and what their biological sex is Source:
The present review focuses on the brain structure of male-to-female (MtF) and female-to-male (FtM) h
https://link.springer.com
