Why Feminism Is Satanism and Why Abortion Is a Ritual

[AMusee]

The recent American controversy about a potential “abortion ban” has reignited heated discussions about a host of subjects, including what really is the essence of feminism, which prides itself on liberating women while, in reality, it not only alienates them but also ends up killing children.

In fact, the Quran 6:137 describes the killing of children as Satanic:

The pagans’ evil associates have made it appealing to them to kill their own children—only leading to their destruction as well as confusion in their faith. Had it been Allah’s Will, they would not have done such a thing. So leave them and their falsehood.

The tafsirs of this ayah mention that the evil associates are devils as well as evil people.

Even non-Muslims have recognized this ancient connection between killing of children and Satan.

Feminism as a Satanist Revolution​

Per Faxneld is a Swedish academic who specializes in the history of religion and is associated with Stockholm University. So, his “secular credentials” are irreproachable; he can’t be accused of being a “religious bigot” who “sees Satanism everywhere,” right?

Well, in 2014 he released a book, Satanic Feminism: Lucifer as the Liberator of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Culture.

In that comprehensive study of more than 500 pages, he begins by demonstrating how general the reference to Iblis is in the feminism movement:

The late nineteenth and early twentieth century: A world- leading female esotericist, whose books sell hundreds of thousands of copies, designates Lucifer the bringer of enlightenment. In Paris, a lesbian poetess publishes a volume where she praises Satan as the creator of womankind as well as the inspirer of feminine poetry and love between women. Americans are shocked when a twenty-year-old woman from Butte, Montana, writes a provocative autobiographical bestseller, in which she uses the Devil as a symbol of freedom from conservative social mores. In particular, she criticizes the oppression of women. Radical feminists in the United States and Europe collaborate on what they call The Woman’s Bible. It eulogizes Eve’s consumption of the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden, and Satan’s function in the tale is claimed to be that of a benign Socratic mentor figure.
Elsewhere, a distinguished American suffragette portrays Black Masses, supposedly celebrated by medieval witches, as an act of feminist insubordination towards God, his priests, and the worldly lords who have all denied the rights of women. In a critically well- received and commercially successful novel by a young Englishwoman, a kindly Satan helps the female protagonist achieve self-actualization and autonomy from her male relatives. An incredibly wealthy Italian marchioness, a world-famous stage actress, and an illustrious silent film star play identity games that involve taking on the role of Satan or portraying themselves as being in league with this entity. Numerous Parisian women adorn themselves with jewellery sensuously depicting Eve’s collusion with the Devil and her partaking of the forbidden fruit.

While reading these lines, you’ll remark that these all involve the masses: famous writers, famed actresses and, more generally, influential public figures. We’re not talking here of a few isolated “intellectuals” writing in some obscure books few would read but an overall pattern which was of civilizational importance in the West.

RELATED: Confessions of a Muslim Ex-Feminist

In the next chapters, he analyzes this “Satanic feminism” in different cultural movements of the modern West, ranging from socialism to Gothic literature (notably the image of the vampire) and Theosophy (the old equivalent to our current “New Age Spirituality”) or even the phenomenon of witches (which are, unsurprisingly, being increasingly re-appropriated by modern feminists).

What’s particularly interesting is that the first “Satanic feminist” is somehow associated with Islam, as he writes in p. 496:

Actual Satanic feminism arises shortly after Satanism (sensu lato) itself appears for certain in world history. Percy Bysshe Shelley, the prime mover in the creation of literary Satanism, was a feminist. In The Revolt of Islam (1818) he merges the two. The Satanically inspired female revolutionary in this narrative declares that the emancipation of woman is a prerequisite for the true liberation of mankind. Hence, The Revolt of Islam, with its frank combining of equally unequivocal Satanism and feminism, makes Percy Shelley the first Satanic feminist.

Isn’t that puzzling? The roots of Satanic feminism are found in a poem which in fact doesn’t even concern Islam directly, yet somehow it had to be included in the title, as if it anticipated what was to come a few centuries later, that is, feminist imperialism targeting Muslims during colonialism and more recently during the “War on Terror.”

RELATED: [WATCH] Feminist Hijabi DEBATE | Should Muslim Women Go to College?

We can’t go through an entire panoramic reading of history as well of feminism literature in this article, though that would definitively demonstrates the Satanism of feminism. For now, let’s look at why abortion is a ritual of this Satanic feminist religion.

Lilith, “Child-Killer” and First Feminist​

In a previous article about the occult in anime, we mentioned the figure of Lilith without extensive elaboration.

But obviously Faxneld couldn’t avoid her, considering the symbol she represents. Thus he writes in pp. 55-58:

While Satan could be female or hermaphroditic, he could also have a wife, who according to certain accounts was called Lilith. This demonic woman, whom some would eventually come to regard as the first feminist, has a long history. Raphael Patai and others have theorized that she has her roots in ancient Sumeria. As Gideon Bohak points out, regardless of where she began her sinister career, Lilith became ‘part and parcel of Jewish demonology already in the Second Temple period’ (530 b.c.– 70 a.d.) and has ‘remained there ever since’. (…)
According to the Alphabet, Lilith and Adam were not a happy couple, since Lilith refused to lie beneath her husband when they had intercourse. She considered herself his equal, since they were both made from the earth, and refused to submit to him in this manner. Lilith then uttered the secret name of God and flew off to the Red Sea. God sent three angels after her, but she refused to return. The angels consequently threatened to drown her. She argued that she was created to cause sickness to infants, and made a deal with God’s messengers to harm no child who is protected by the names or images of the angels. This last part of the tale sets out to explain the already widespread Jewish practice of hanging amulets with the names of these three angels around the necks of newborns. (…)
In later times, however, Lilith lived on primarily as a figure perceived by tradition-bound Jews to be a threat to newborns. Aside from using amulets, they would draw a circle on the wall in male children’s room and write within it ‘Adam and Eve. Out Lilith!’ The door of the room would be inscribed with the names of the three angels. Such practices have been amply documented throughout the centuries, and belief in Lilith the child-killer persisted at least until the late nineteenth century in traditional Jewish communities.

So for the Jews, Lilith, “the first feminist,” is a demon-like figure who targets children and newborns in particular, to the extent she’s known as “the child-killer.”

Faxneld then writes about the perception of Lilith among non-Jews, how she was also known as “the child-murderer” (p. 58) or how Aleister Crowley, the most influential of the modern European occultists, whom we mentioned in a previous article, named his first child Lilith (p. 60).

Writing about feminist reappraisal of Lilith, Faxneld brings another poem which is again indirectly connected to Islam, in pp. 62-63:

Another depiction of Lilith as a proto-feminist (aided in her emancipation by Satan) is Ada Langworthy Collier’s (1843– 1919) book-length poem Lilith: The Legend of the First Woman (1885), which her contemporaries considered to be the author’s greatest work. (…)
All the same, after Lilith’s flight from her obstinate male chauvinist husband she ends up in an intimate relationship with Satan (who goes by his Islamic name Eblis). (…)
As time passes, Lilith develops a consuming longing for children and grows jealous of Eve, who has begotten a young one by Adam.

Isn’t that strange how Satanic feminism makes random and unnecessary references to Islam? Perhaps it’s a sign for “Muslim” feminists.

RELATED: Muslim Feminism: The Modern Form of Burying Your Daughters

 

[AMusee]

There are just too many references linking Lilith with feminism, and such a connection is proudly affirmed by feminists themselves.

For instance, take the Lilith Magazine, which dubs itself as a “Jewish feminist” journal, and which has been described as such in an article aptly titled Born to kill children and men: the resurrection of Lilith:

In 1976, Jewish feminist magazine Lilith was founded, and Zuckoff explained in the first issue why the magazine was named after the ancient demon: “Lilith is a powerful female … By acknowledging Lilith’s revolt and even in telling of her vengeful activities, myth-makers also acknowledge Lilith’s power.”
Lilith has become a modern-day feminist icon for three main reasons: she’s independent, she fights the patriarchy and she owns her sexuality. In 1972, Judith Plaskow, a theologian, helped this interpretation reach the cultural elevation it has today by writing a parable titled The Coming of Lilith (…) the release of the story, in the midst of the era of second wave feminism, certainly helped to change attitudes towards the figure of Lilith. Some of the ideas Plaskow draws upon in her parable still resonate today, for instance: challenging gender stereotypes, bodily integrity and individualism.
The idea of Lilith as a feminist symbol has inspired many Jewish feminists and pagans to create their own stories about Lilith in the form of articles, songs and poetry. The book Whose Lilith?, released in 1998, features many of these art works.

But what about the ritual of abortion in particular? This is a “viral” Tweet from the magazine’s official account:




In Texas there’s an organization which works for “abortion access,” as they themselves say, and which chose for itself the name Lilith Fund.

On its website, it describes its “mission” as such:

We provide financial assistance and emotional support while building community spaces for people who need abortions in Texas—unapologetically, with compassion and conviction. Through organizing and movement-building, we foster a positive culture around abortion, strengthen people power, and fight for reproductive justice in and with our communities.

Imagine someone writing “We foster a positive culture around suicide,” or “We foster a positive culture around racial discrimination”? Yet the feminist religion gets away with so much despite its dark dogmas.

RELATED: Disturbing “Fetal” Remains Controversy: Islam and Abortion Normalization

If abortion has become such a ritual in the feminist religion, it’s because in the feminist mythology, the idea of motherhood is seen as limiting the woman’s “agency,” “freedom,” or “bodily autonomy.” All these ideas are represented in the symbol of Lilith, a Satanic figure known for murdering children, which they acknowledge with delight. Insofar as feminism seeks to nullify and destroy motherhood, what more apt symbol or action can there be than the killing of babies in the womb?

Modern feminism is obviously a byproduct of the West’s inner contradictions, the West having birthed extremist ideologies such as feminism, materialism, capitalism, and so on because of this civilization’s innate disequilibrium. A lot of this originates from the Shirk of Christianity.

RELATED: “God Is Dead”: How Christianity Anticipated Nietzsche

And this feminist war against motherhood and the weaponization of abortion might find its roots in the Bible as well, which explicitly considers childbearing as a sort of punishment.

We thus read in Genesis 3:16 the “divine punishment” for Eve’s eating of the forbidden fruit:

To the woman he [God] said,
“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”

This is also the reason why Christians believe that Mary (‘alayha as’salam) didn’t go through labor pain, as opposed to Islam (see Qur’an 19:23). Islam recognizes that labor pain is natural and is a reason to honor our mothers (see Qur’an 31:14 and Qur’an 46:15), certainly not an eternal punishment for a whole gender based on some “original sin.”

So, when there is such an unjust punishments for all of the Eve’s, why be surprised by all the Lilith’s to come?

RELATED: The False Teachings of the Feminist Dogma

https://muslimskeptic.com/2022/05/05/feminism-satanism-abortion/

 

[AMusee]

 

[Nomadic lord]

let the heathens do what they see fit all that matters is that we don't follow suit.

 

[AMusee]

 

[AMusee]

“Muslim” Activists Melt Down Over Possibility of Abortion Ban​

The US political scene is in an uproar as the “unthinkable” is set to happen. Abortion could soon be legally BANNED:

Reuters:

A leaked initial draft majority opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide, Politico reported on Monday.
The unprecedented leak stunned Washington. It holds the potential to reshape the political landscape ahead of U.S. midterm elections in November.

Contrary to what ignorant feminists claim, the original Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling did not give women the unqualified right to rip out babies from their womb whenever they wanted. Rather, the Court claimed that there has to be a balance between the rights and interests of the mother and the interests of society (notice how the rights of the father factor no where in any of this, yet another example of how the West has been a feminist dystopia for decades now).

Society obviously has an interest in birth. For example, if women stop having babies, society will go extinct.

The details of that balance between the mother’s interests and the interests of the state, i.e., society’s can be summarized like this:

In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision in McCorvey’s favor ruling that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion.
It also ruled that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against governments’ interests in protecting women’s health and prenatal life. The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother.

So, banning third semester abortion (except in life or death situation) is already consistent with Roe v. Wade. You might not have known that. The crazy thing is that feminist activists have wanted to go further. They have wanted the right to literally tear out their babies in the third trimester. Some have even advocated for “after-birth” abortions. Basically, if the mother doesn’t like her newborn child, she should have the unconditional right to kill it!

RELATED: Disturbing “Fetal” Remains Controversy: Islam and Abortion Normalization

“Muslim” Activists Losing Their Minds​

This was predictable.

RELATED: Ilhan Omar Bravely Introduces Anti-Sharia Legislation to Congress

Sarsour is organizing a vigil. Is it to mourn the tens of millions of lives snuffed out every year by abortion? Or is it to mourn the 22-year old who has to suffer the inconvenience of not murdering her child?

RELATED: Does Linda Sarsour Think Islam Accepts Homosexuality?

We don’t want to set it back 50 years, Linda. We want to set it back 1400 years.​

The liberal “Muslim” sheroes are having a MELT DOWN, of course. Do they meltdown for anything other than the interests of homosexuals, transgenders, and fornicaters?

These are the “leaders” we were told by Compassionate Imams to support for years.

Notice how Sarsour is suddenly so concerned about people being able to make their own health decisions. Where was all this moral outrage when they were pushing mandatory death vaxx on us and our children? I guess Sarsour only believes that we can make our own decisions when it comes to murdering babies, but not when Pfizer has new record-breaking profits to make.

Also, Ilhan and Sarsour keep talking about WOMEN’s health. That is EXTREMELY transphobic. They should say “birthing person.” This is not just about women’s health. Men and non binary entities can get abortions too.

If you have Twitter, make sure to reply to their tweets pointing out their hateful transphobia.

 

[AMusee]

How Many Abortions Are for “Health” Reasons?​

All this garbage about “women’s lives at risk” and “women’s health” is the most vile feminist lie. What percentage of abortions are due to health reasons where a woman’s physical health is in danger because of the pregnancy? Not even 1%. Most abortions are due to women who don’t want the responsibility of motherhood, mostly because they want to work and be able to fornicate with no consequence. Banning all non-life-threatening abortions would vastly reduce zina in society and increase motherhood, which would have countless benefits for society.

The trick that these feminists use, by the way, is saying that if a woman doesn’t want to have a baby, that negatively impacts her mental health. So, by this definition of “health” essentially ALL abortions are for “health reasons.” Imagine. If a woman doesn’t get to do everything she wants, including murder her unborn child, then that is considered psychologically traumatizing for her. Any time a woman has to face some sort of accountability or consequence for her decisions, her mental health is compromised. All of society has to bend over backwards to the point of tolerating baby murder just so that women don’t experience the slightest inconvenience. This is really the world that we live in now. This is what a society run by women is like.

RELATED: Does Islam Allow Abortion? False Equivalencies and Reflexive Centrism

Deviant “Muslim” Organizations Demand More Baby Killing​

You might have missed this news from last year: A bunch of ineffectual “Muslim” orgs wrote an open letter calling all Muslims to oppose any abortion bans. They did this as response to the great news that the state of Texas had put strict limitations on abortion.

Here is the letter, published by the nearly-defunct MuslimGirl blog.

The organizations involved:

Muslim Advocates

KARAMAH: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights

HEART Women and Girls

American Muslim Bar Association

Muslim Wellness Foundation

American Muslim Health Professionals

Muslim Public Affairs Council

Veteran MuslimSkeptic readers will, of course, be familiar with the vile MuslimGirl as well as HEART Women and Girls. But all of these organizations are at the same level of deviation and moral depravity. Some of them, other than HEART, are quite vocal proponents of homosexuality, transgenderism, and gay “Muslims.”

You will note that their open letter appeals to the “diversity of fiqh” article written by Omar Suleiman and published by Yaqeen Institute. It’s no coincidence that the most deviant munafiqeen cite Yaqeen material. Normally, one would not blame an org for the kind of people who cite its work. But in this case, Yaqeen invited the approval of such fussaq and fahishah-promoters by including in its article a passionate defense of Planned Parenthood, i.e., the main institutional promoter of abortion (and LGBT and trans kids and…) in the US, founded by a white supremacist feminist, Margaret Sanger.

As for the contents of the letter and the “diversity of fiqh” argument, this deserves its own analysis. But suffice to say, it is complete rubbish. There is no diversity in the fiqh because no school of fiqh has ever said that a woman has the unconditional right to terminate her pregnancy whenever she wants. The most permissive minority positions in classical fiqh which allow termination up to 120 days after conception nonetheless require the consent of the husband. You will not find any “my body, my choice” affirming fiqh views in the entirety of the fiqh corpus, no matter what vague and fraudulent claims the Compassionate Imams and their orgs shilling for the Democratic party in the US might tell you.

And even if scholars of the past allowed women the unconditional right to abortion, they were speaking in a world where fornication was not rampant, where women weren’t abandoning marriage and motherhood to be corporate wage slaves, etc. In our world, where these diseases are not only rampant, but are in fact, tearing society to shreds right before our very eyes, the ulama of our tradition would have strongly denounced abortion and its vile promoters as tools of Iblis himself! As evidence for this, you will note that no legitimate scholarly authority has affirmed “my body, my choice” and the unconditional right for women to abort.

So, shut up with your “diversity of fiqh” nonsense.

(The larger claim in the open letter that Muslim states historically did not prefer one fiqh opinion and establish it into policy is laughably false. Even in the time of the Khulafa al-Rashidun, there were often multiple opinions that the Sahaba held, yet the khalifa — Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali — would invariably institute the position he understood as closer to the truth. May Allah be pleased with them all!)

 

[AMusee]

There Is Always Hope for Those Who Enjoin Good and Forbid Evil​

If this Supreme Court decision goes through and abortion can be made illegal again in the US, this shows how much effect speaking out against evil can have.

One of the excuses the Compassionate Imams gave for their support of gay marriage and other LGBT rights was that the question of LGBT rights was a done deal and there is no going back, so Muslims should just accept it and move on.

Look at how evil the mentality of these munafiqeen!

Even if it were a done deal, so what? We would never support the fahisha of Qawm Lut. But it obviously is never a done deal. Laws are overturned all the time, and this abortion issue is only the most recent example. There is nothing to say that Qawm Lutism can’t be similarly overturned in the near future as long as we do our part by actually following the sunnah of Prophet Lut. Amr bil-Ma`ruf and nahi `anil-Munkar never stops!

InshaAllah

What About Tawhid?​

As usual, you will find some Crypto Reformers and Faux Traditionalists, i.e., liberal munifiqeen cosplaying as imams and students of knowledge, say:

“Why should we care what the kuffar do? If they want to do abortion and gay sex, that is nothing compared to shirk. Our only dawah should be about tawhid and conversion to Islam!”

The stupid excuses from these fools become more putrid by the day.

If you look at the dawah of the Quran when it was first revealed and delivered to the Quraysh, it was not exclusively about tawhid. Many initial ayat were dedicated to not burying daughters, not stealing from orphans, feeding the hungry, not taking advantage of travelers and the destitute. Are these Crypto Reformers going to criticize the Quran for not exclusively focusing on tawhid?

The reality is, tawhid has little chance of being accepted in a society full of vice and corruption. We see it with our very own eyes. You think these blue haired, non binary, screaming abortionist queers have to ability to even contemplate Allah, let alone submit to Him? These abominations have become so deformed by the evil forces running rampant in society that the message of tawhid cannot compute with them.

Allah protect us!

 

[Aurelian]

Abortion is a ritual? You sane ?

 

[Omar del Sur]

Abortion is a ritual? You sane ?

Which sins are you against?

 

[Omar del Sur]

let the heathens do what they see fit all that matters is that we don't follow suit.

Enjoin the good and forbid the evil.

 

[Sigala]

Abortion is a ritual? You sane ?

it is your killing an innocent soul without right.

 

[Goodbye ✌]

It is without a doubt that abortion is prohibited unless if medically necessary (mothers life is at risk) and for cases of rape, incest, etc.

I believe a majority of us here understand this. We can stop discussing this now.

 

[Sigala]

It is without a doubt that abortion is prohibited unless if medically necessary (mothers life is at risk) and for cases of rape, incest, etc.

I believe a majority of us here understand this. We can stop discussing this now.

Even rape is not right because your life isn't in danger they should give up the child for adoption after giving birth rather than abort an innocent soul

 

[Yusuf Abdi Ali Rashid]

Abortion is a ritual? You sane ?

Yes a ritual, after planned parenthood murders innocent children, they extract the stem cells and send the stem cells to politicians on their payroll. These stem cells enable said politicians to live far longer and far healthier than their civilian counterparts. Nancy pelosi is 82, my grandma who is a healthy 73 year old needs help walking. How is this possible, the answer is stem cells.

 

[Aurelian]

Yes a ritual, after planned parenthood murders innocent children, they extract the stem cells and send the stem cells to politicians on their payroll. These stem cells enable said politicians to live far longer and far healthier than their civilian counterparts. Nancy pelosi is 82, my grandma who is a healthy 73 year old needs help walking. How is this possible, the answer is stem cells.

I wouldn't take you seriously anyway, mr I'm cacasian

 

[Yusuf Abdi Ali Rashid]

I wouldn't take you seriously anyway, mr I'm cacasian

I am caucasian, as is the entirety of the somali race.

Look at me and tell me i’m not caucasian.

 

[Aurelian]

I am caucasian, as is the entirety of the somali race.

Look at me and tell me i’m not caucasian.
View attachment 227891

you need to investigated

 

[AMusee]

The Hypocrisy Behind Roe v Wade and Liberalism: Islam’s Solution​

The liberal democrats are back at doing what the do best. Displaying their blatant hypocrisy and generating fear and panic among brainwashed individuals via mass media and misinformation.

The current Roe v Wade situation is a good example of both. First let’s take a look at their liberal hypocrisy with an example from Joe Biden:

President Joe Biden said Friday “the health and life of women in this nation are now at risk” after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the constitutional right to an abortion.

And this is what the liberal ‘Muslim’ politician Ilhan Omar had to say:

“This decision is devastating for millions of women and pregnant people across the country. I am outraged this right-wing court is turning the clock back on generations of progress and prohibiting individuals to have autonomy over their bodies.

Unfortunately, these leftist American politicians can’t stand the fact that the progressive degeneracy overshadowing their nation might now face obstacles due to the Satanic practice, i.e., abortion, being banned. Instead, they want to stand firm against any hope of family values being reintroduced into American society.

And it’s a mistake to think that these kinds of politicians care at all about the safety of women. Some of you might be confused by that. You may be thinking that well, aren’t Joe Biden and Ilhan Omar feminists, and so by extension, in favor of womens’ safety? The truth is, while they support the former, they couldn’t care less about the latter. Because the two are not synonymous. Feminism promotes women to have as much freedom as possible, no matter the physical, financial, spiritual, or psychological cost to them or the rest of society. It doesn’t care about the harms it causes women or anyone else, and so, it can’t be something that promotes their safety.

RELATED: Roe v. Wade: The Pro-Choice Movement Hall of Shame

Do you really believe that Joe Biden, the architect behind the War on Terror that resulted in the deaths of countless Afghan women and children, cares at all about the safety of women? Do you really believe that Ilhan Omar, the woman who voted in favor of unconditional support to Israel in the form of billions of dollars that turned the life of countless Palestinian women and children into hell, cares at all about the safety of women? It would be absurd to think so.

And American politicians aren’t the only hypocrites here. Let’s take a look at some of their fellow die-hard liberal political allies, starting with the devil, Emmanuel Macron:

“Abortion is a fundamental right for all women. We must protect it. I would like to express my solidarity with all those women whose freedoms have today been compromised by the U.S. Supreme Court,”

This is what Boris Johnson had to say:

“I’ve always believed in a woman’s right to choose and I stick to that view and that is why the UK has the laws that it does.”

Even Justin “Death Vaxx Dictator” Trudeau chimed in:

“No government, politician, or man should tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her body.”

Look at how they rush to the aid of all the ‘helpless’ women in order to ensure their right to continue selling their bodies. In order to ensure their right to continue devaluing themselves by having sexual relations with countless men. In order to ensure their right to zero accountability and responsibility when it comes to making important decisions that will negatively impact their soul and psyche. In order to ensure their right to live as degenerate baby killers. Would the same apply for Muslim women though?

Would Macron stand with Muslim women’s right to wear Hijab? And when I say Hijab I mean the proper Islamically prescribed one, wherein a Muslim woman keeps herself away from non-Mahrams both physically and through her actions. Not the kind we have liberal Muslims displaying today, where a turban Hijab covers only part of the head and nothing else, and her whole life is to be the plaything of non-Mahram men.

Would Boris Johnson support a Muslim woman’s right to live a modest lifestyle? To live a life free of the pressures of feminism and liberalism? Would Justin Trudeau support the right of a woman to live in a traditional family as a housewife? Her right to marry early, instead of chasing careers and independence? The answer is obviously no because, if they cared about these things, they would support social policies, a legal regime, a media apparatus, etc., that promoted these things instead of their opposite. But they won’t do that because it contradicts liberalism.

They don’t care about women’s rights. They don’t care about the safety of women. And certainly not when it comes to Muslim women.

All that these liberal World Economic Forum minions care about is spreading degeneracy in order to gain votes and gain votes in order to spread degeneracy.

RELATED: “Muslim” Activists Melt Down Over Possibility of Abortion Ban

This brings us to our second point. Controlling the masses through fear.

For example, an article from Wired is now warning people that the overturning of Roe v Wade is going to lead to reduced privacy and more surveillance by the state. What? Even if this article is to be taken at face value, citizens of the U.S. are ALREADY under heavy surveillance, and this would just constitute an additional drop in the overflowing bucket of privacy invasion.

Anyone who has heard about whistleblowers like Edward Snowden understands that the privacy of American citizens is a joke. And if they’re so worried about surveillance, then how about protesting against actual laws that allow this kind of invasion of privacy. How about protesting against Big Tech companies like Apple, Google, and Meta, and holding their CEOs accountable, along with the governments they’re in bed with, instead of blaming an actual for once good decision by this country’s justice system?

An article by Forbes fears the economic effect that this decision is going to have on the country. Fewer women will now be able to pursue education and careers as they would now have to look after children at home born. Muslims need to understand that this is a good thing. We’re opposed to selling our Muslim women into universities that make them adopt feminist ideologies and pursue independence through careers. We’re opposed to selling our Muslim women into careerism where they will most likely become societal and corporate slaves, in a life where it will be near impossible for them to live by the tenets of Islam. We’re opposed to selling our Muslim women into a life where they will be middle aged yet without a family, unmarried and lonely, relying on cats and antidepressants.

One of the fears all these mainstream articles are propagating are the “health emergencies” and “pregnancy risks” that women will now allegedly face due to this ban. These liberal politicians are spewing the same garbage. If you remember back when COVID hit, this is the same tactic they were using. Forcing people into wearing masks, staying indoors, and getting the death vaxx by generating fear against a disease that did less damage than the common cold. Only, with this abortion ban this approach is just absurd, because abortion will still be legal under these medical emergencies:

The 13 states with abortion ban laws make exceptions for the life of the mother. These are typically cases of ectopic pregnancies, fallopian tube abscesses and ovarian abnormalities. Five of the states also allow abortions where pregnancy threatens a serious risk of substantial and irreversible injury. Utah is the only state that permits abortions in the case of a fatal fetal abnormality, which develops in about 3 of every 1,000 pregnancies.

So then, what’s the problem? Even when abortion is still going to occur in the rare exceptions involving medical emergencies. Again, it’s because women’s health and safety isn’t their concern here. They just want as much fahisha in society as possible.

 

[AMusee]

This shows us the roots of ideologies like liberalism and feminism. At heart, they don’t care about what’s right, they care about unlimited freedom. They look at the temporary desires, not the long term harms. A woman should have the choice to fornicate immediately without having to think about the long term PTSD she’s going to develop from murdering her baby if she were to get pregnant and subsequently get an abortion as a result of this fornication.

And that’s the other thing. American society’s collapse is directly linked to how much freedom and empowerment women were given. That kind of a hedonistic lifestyle led to lesser and lesser gender segregation, which obviously led to rampant fornication. This hypersexualized society with decreasing morals is teeming with horrifying problems like new and dangerous STDs, young girls being increasingly sold into prostitution and human trafficking rings, the rise of ography and subsequent objectification of women in advertisements and media as sex objects, etc. This progressive disease is nothing but a positive feedback loop of immorality. And what was the brilliant solution they came up with? To legalize abortion, thus facilitating the one thing that was keeping this problem from spiraling even more out of control.

Alcohol was a great contributor to this problem. And what was the solution for that? Did they ban alcohol? Again, no. In fact, alcohol production is now a very large and profitable business in the U.S.

In the name of freedom and choice, they keep facilitating decisions that promote even more and more degeneracy, and when someone questions it, they’ve devised these weak tactics of exaggerating the little things they are preventing by implementing their decisions. It’s like creating a hole in the ship, and letting water in. And when someone rightfully objects to it, giving arguments like “Well, the plants on the ship needed watering.”

Even deviant liberal Muslim organizations are using this argument, claiming that abortion is allowed in Islam under rare medical exceptions. Which, yes it is. But does that mean Muslims should support unlimited access to elective abortion? A great analogy is that if pork and alcohol are allowed in Islam under the rare circumstances of extreme starvation and thirst when no other food or drink is available, then does that mean Muslims should oppose any hypothetical bans on pork or alcohol in America?

We’ve gotten to a point where if a decision is taken that incentivizes people to get married and form families and makes them think twice before fornicating (and this doesn’t just apply to women, even husbands will be discouraged from cheating on their wives out of this fear), you have liberal Muslim groups in utter shock over it, misguiding the Ummah into thinking that this is a bad decision for Muslims. May Allah protect us and give us all the ability to see clearly through these kinds of deviants.

RELATED: Why Feminism Is Satanism and Why Abortion Is a Ritual