Why do young Somalis in the west deny the Isaaq genocide but have unlimited concern for Gaza and Sudan?

Offer them actual power in the govt while also retaining full autonomy of their state on the condition that they drop the talks immediately after all waqooyi feeling alienated from konfuur was what started everything in the first place. After that we can sit down and have further dialogue which would include public apologies reparations and further initiatives. Either they accept these terms or we go back to the status quo they aren’t in a position where they can dictate terms.

Thats a good idea ngl

When you are dealing with a group that has nothing to lose like those in Hargeisa, we need to be up in our game i always put my self in their shoes. Why are they wanting to go it alone. what caused it why did they first join the Somali republic in 1960 , and then how can w repair the union., i think we can get them back to join once we abolish the 4.5 system now as it stands they have no chance to be president and prime minister of the country this is an important factor.
 
Offer them actual power in the govt while also retaining full autonomy of their state on the condition that they drop the talks immediately after all waqooyi feeling alienated from konfuur was what started everything in the first place. After that we can sit down and have further dialogue which would include public apologies reparations and further initiatives. Either they accept these terms or we go back to the status quo they aren’t in a position where they can dictate terms.

Thats a good idea ngl

It really all goes back to the divide created by colonialism. The colonial powers centered almost all political and economic power in Mogadishu, which made the distant northern regions feel sidelined and disconnected.

The governments that came after independence did try to bridge that gap, but they lacked the resources and infrastructure to do it effectively , they inherited very little.

I think if Somalis everywhere recognized that we all share the same underlying desire , for local political participation, fairness, and reconciliation , it would make genuine unity and progress a lot more achievable.
 

3LetterzMM

LG gang we gon slide for my nigga 🀐πŸ₯·
When you are dealing with a group that has nothing to lose like those in Hargeisa, we need to be up in our game i always put my self in their shoes. Why are they wanting to go it alone. what caused it why did they first join the Somali republic in 1960 , and then how can w repair the union., i think we can get them back to join once we abolish the 4.5 system now as it stands they have no chance to be president and prime minister of the country this is an important factor.
4.5 should be banned for plenty of reasons other than just that. Democracy is the way to go let the people vote and decide who they want leading them if isaaq want the seat for themselves they can put somebody in and rally up folks to hit the polls that’s the beauty of democracy everyone has a fair chance to win it’s the man with the best policies that takes it home by winning over the neutral tribes votes. This country went to shit the moment our democracy got overthrown.
 
Why do you think they have a monopoly on hurt? Many clans suffered under Kacaan and after the war; including clans that were massacred by the isaaq themselves.
Ever heard of the Dilla massacre perpetrated by the isaaq against gadabuursi?
This man recounts what isaaq did to people of Boorama - and, he asserts that what the isaaq did to Boorama was genocide, and not what was done to them by the kacaan.

BTW, I think the term massacre is more fitting to describe what Kacaan regime did but no one was genocided; not Isaaqs, not Daarood, not gudubiirsi and not Hawiye.
The Kacaan poisoned wells- there is no life without water, as you well know. Not to mention murdering people, raping women and destroying houses. This was a scorched earth policy.

Particularly when intended towards one heritage group DOES meet the definition of a genocide.
How many people died in this genocide? For how long did it go?
 
No one can deny something that happened. Isaaq was massacred by the dictator and his army. I fully support their cause being recognised as a genocide by the state. I also support Digil and Mirifles cause of being recognised as a genocide by a somali militia and the same for Madow weyne. I hope what happened in the early days of the civil war never repeats in Somalilands IA.
 
Last edited:
There hasn't been an Isaaq genocide. The Somali National Army (SNA) responded veraciously to the SNM attack in 1988 - 1989; however, there haven't been systematic massacres carried out by the Somali military against Isaaq civilians similar or even closer to the Rwandan genocide against Tutsis.

The Isaaq genocide is a myth perpetuated by the supporters of the "Somaliland" secession.

In fact, the closest tragedy to genocide in Somalia occurred in the 1990s against the Digil and Mirifle and Jarerweyne communities after Somali militias prevented the food aid from reaching them.
The SNM were a response to repression of Isaaq civilians by decades of economic starvation and a rise in killings and displacement from Pro Barre militia
 
Why do you think they have a monopoly on hurt? Many clans suffered under Kacaan and after the war; including clans that were massacred by the isaaq themselves.
Ever heard of the Dilla massacre perpetrated by the isaaq against gadabuursi?
This man recounts what isaaq did to people of Boorama - and, he asserts that what the isaaq did to Boorama was genocide, and not what was done to them by the kacaan.

BTW, I think the term massacre is more fitting to describe what Kacaan regime did but no one was genocided; not Isaaqs, not Daarood, not gudubiirsi and not Hawiye.

How many people died in this genocide? For how long did it go?


This is what i mean somalis have selective mind yes sure the Gadabuursi to were massacared in dila no one saying that the gadabuursi shouldnt griev for the death of their kin , this how ever doesnt take away that the barre regime committed serious crimes against the people of Hargeisa one is not worse then the other, somalis have this selective mind , reer hebel wala dilay ana wala ii dilay , , we should make this about , what aboutism.
 
This is what i mean somalis have selective mind yes sure the Gadabuursi to were massacared in dila no one saying that the gadabuursi shouldnt griev for the death of their kin , this how ever doesnt take away that the barre regime committed serious crimes against the people of Hargeisa one is not worse then the other, somalis have this selective mind , reer hebel wala dilay ana wala ii dilay , , we should make this about , what aboutism.
Ha i nabin. I never said Barre regime didn't commit serious crimes against the people of Hargeisa. I am rejecting the idea that "isaaq genocide" is uniquely forgotten or denied.
I have asked some my isaaq friends about this gadabuursi massacring and they all justified it. Even though we all know that gadabuursi are not Daarood/kacaan system and could not be held accountable ever for what the kacaan did. Your hypocrisy is just too obvious.
 

cunug3aad

3rdchild Β· Beelweynta Islaamiga
Every one suffered and every one committed atrocity and there is not one single group absolved of any blame. There is no single group or division or tribe that destroyed somalia other than somalis and as long as the entire populace does not recognise and understand that fact they will never get past step 1 of country building
 
How many people died in this genocide? For how long did it go?

Different figures but the estimates are in the low thousands, but that doesn't account for the people who got poisoned from the years that followed, as the Kacaan poisoned the wells.


One quote pertaining the attacks, but that doesn't factor in the many that were arrested and tortured beforehand and afterwards.

A β€œFact Finding Mission Report on Somalia (2007)” states: β€œIn the months of May and June 1979, over 2,000 Majerteen were said to have died in Mudug region at the hands of Barre’s crack troops, the Red Berets.”

And these quotes only refer to Mudug and not Nugaal

A general history source notes: β€œIn May and June 1979, more than 2,000 Umar Mahamuud (a sub-lineage of the Majerteen) died of thirst in the waterless area northeast of Galcaio, Garoowe, and Jerriiban.”




Another quote from a Somali source below;
====================



NUGAAL

Over 250 houses destroyed
105 wells/water cachments destroyed + poisoned
450 people massacred (of course including women, children and elderly).


In the following places:
Kalabayr, Jalam, Eyl, Rabaable, Magacley, Maygaag, Sugulle, Ballidacar, Qamboobley.


MUDUG:
The following places were targeted for ethnic cleansing:

Ballibusle, Seemade, Qalaanqal, Gosol, Xarfo, Qorile-Dheere, Barde Gobol, Gacnafale, Bacaadweyn, Roox, Labagardaye, Sagaaro-doox, Dogob, Dudun, Galxamur,Laanmadow,Riigomane,Candho-dhexe, Bursaalax,Taaloole,Bayra,Nugaalgaban,


1500 houses burnt
350 water cachments destroyed and poisoned
Over 800 people massacred (of course including women, children and elderly).
 
The real reason why Somalis argue against each other about what is a genocide and isn't, is a common issue that has been covered by scholars.
Many scholars argue that colonial and Cold War–era frameworks failed to recognize clan-based extermination campaigns as genocide because they didn’t fit neat ethnic definitions.

Just because another Somali clan leader attempts to destroy a people, it will not be called a 'genocide'. But in reality, attacking a group, poisoning their wells etc, is called extermination/genocide. This is the real reason why many Somali and Africans do not meet the so-called criteria for 'genocide'. But go tell that to the survivors and their descendants !
 
Ha i nabin. I never said Barre regime didn't commit serious crimes against the people of Hargeisa. I am rejecting the idea that "isaaq genocide" is uniquely forgotten or denied.
I have asked some my isaaq friends about this gadabuursi massacring and they all justified it. Even though we all know that gadabuursi are not Daarood/kacaan system and could not be held accountable ever for what the kacaan did. Your hypocrisy is just too obvious.


First i am not bias towards any one i am not isaaq nor am i gadabuursi , its sad to see bad blood between the Dir communities lucky for the Somalis that they have reconciled about it , what i said what barre did to isaaq should be mentioned and there for it shoud also be mentioned that killings happened against the gadabuursi, thogh we could say we can talk about the scale , of the dilla massacre, i think they should talk about it every somali life lost in the war should be mentioned, so i think you missunderstood me
 

Vacelere

♠️♠️♠️
I don't deny the genocide but I have problem when isaaq speak about it as there was no other massacres happened against other tribes by siad barre and his generals (who also came from different tribes) and the the genocide against the marehan with the fall of his rule.

Simply you aren't more special than the rest of us, the whole of Somalia bleed.

And tbh you guys didn't learn from this horrible event and did the same to your neighbours

I belive isaaqis shouldn't use this sad event as excuse to claim their so called republic.
 
Its clearly due to qabyalaad and kids have been poisoned by their qabiilist parents, primarily in America.

More Isaaqs died than in Gaza and Sudan. Hargeisa and Burco were close to 100% destroyed. Not only is there no regret for it happening but people deny it even happened.

I think the Somalianlanders online are motivated to hit back and work with the rightwing due to this denial. Imagine how different the environment would be if Somalians were just honest and regretful about the past and move forward.
More Isaaqs died than in Gaza and Sudan?? :pachah1:
 
I don't deny the genocide but I have problem when isaaq speak about it as there was no other massacres happened against other tribes by siad barre and his generals (who also came from different tribes) and the the genocide against the marehan with the fall of his rule.

Simply you aren't more special than the rest of us, the whole of Somalia bleed.

And tbh you guys didn't learn from this horrible event and did the same to your neighbours

I belive isaaqis shouldn't use this sad event as excuse to claim their so called republic.


The issue at hand is this case dear lads why do we Somalis grow uncomfortable whenever the Isaaq speak of their genocide, however tragic it may be? Why is our immediate response to resort to whataboutism to bring up the suffering of the Rahanweyn, the Gadabuursi, or the Majeerteen? This tendency is precisely what is wrong.


I consider myself one of the staunchest opponents of Somaliland’s independence. I firmly believe that our economy, our security, our markets indeed, our very survival are best safeguarded through unity as one nation. Yet, I must commend Somaliland for its free elections, for reconciling its clans, and for the establishment of the Guurti. These are achievements worthy of respect indeed and that we can learn from in the broader Somali context.


However, we must not feel uneasy when the subject of the Isaaq genocide arises. I have never witnessed Somalilanders, unprovoked, claim that other atrocities are of lesser importance. So why is it that we respond defensively, deflecting with comparisons whenever this painful chapter is mentioned?


If we truly wish to reconcile our past with our future, this is a cornerstone issue that must be confronted openly and honestly. No one is saying that Siad Barre himself or any single clan alone was responsible; it was the regime, a state machinery that committed those crimes. Therefore, why do we, as Somalis, find it so difficult to face this truth without discomfort? xaasha somali sidan ku ma badbaadi karto
 
Top