Who looks better?
- Thread starter Calmone20
- Start date
If the mixing is between European and Bantu/West African parents, then both biracial communities should have similar outcomes. Some looking good, some looking average or ugly. Geography does not determine outcome in that case since you have the same racial mixes.
Calmone20
Formerly CalmOne
Uk madows and cadaans are ugly af. AAs and white Americans are more goodlooking,which is why American biracials look better than UK biracials.
Geography certainly plays a role.
There is no homogeneity among African Americans. They vary in admixture. The majority of mixed race in the UK come from Jamacian parentage (most being more Subsaharan). Both transatlantic madows cannot be traced to a single West or Central African tribe. They are Pan-West-Central African. Generally the cadaan British are less attractive than Americans despite their greater obesity crisis.
You answered your question then and gave the reason.
American biracials have more diversity due to years of mixing. You have the typical 50/50s, the 60/40s, 70/30s, 90/10s etc wheras in tge UK you mostly just have 50/50 or occasionally 25/75. plus American biracial have more diversity in geography (and as a result looks) being from all over Europe and all over Africa wheras in the UK we just have the jamaican celts and Saxons.
Point is american biracials look better by default because there’s more diversity within them
Point is american biracials look better by default because there’s more diversity within them
