White Knights, Beta Orbiters, Cucks. An In Depth Analysis

Arma

GRAND Wizard of MJ SIXIIR
VIP
Three types of men. Three kinds of men. Three utter complete failures, and waste of oxygen, who are better off going to their local woodlands with a rope, stand beside a tree, tie one end of the rope on the tree branch, and the other around their necks, and simply lean forward.

Below, I will be going into deep analysis of each of these types of men, and expose their way of thinking, and why they do, the things they do.

White Knights:

These are the guys, who see themselves, as the saviours of all and every women. They seek to protect women, from the "evils" of the Patriarchy, and take the side of women, no matter the situation, no matter the case, and no matter, if the women were at fault.

An example of a White Knight would be a nightclub bouncer, who is called to an altercation between a man and a woman, and without knowing who was at fault (sometimes even knowing the female was to blame) kicks out the man from the club. Another example of White Knights, are the men who put into law, the Divorce-rape, that men go through, by having their ex-wife, getting half of every the man owns.

They side with women, purely so they could get brownie points from women, and to woow women, into thinking hes a good man, and that they would drop their knickers for them.

Beta Orbiters:

Now, this one here, I absolutely detest, with all my life, because, I had an experience with one, who tried to get between me and my wife, when we were dating - early in our relationship.

Beta Orbiters, are men who after showing romantic interests in a woman, get rejected. Even though, they've been rejected, they instead opt to settle with the next best thing: Friendship.

Now, the strategy of them going for friendship, instead of just moving on from the woman, that's rejected them, is that (they hope) with time and great care, they could show that woman, how warm, caring, thoughtful, and loving they are. They hope, in time, this strategy, will win them over that woman.

If indeed this strategy fails, and the woman is still not romantically interested, is that they would stick around longer, and hope and pray, that some form of tragedy, will befall the woman, putting her at a point of vulnerability, so that her defenses will lower, and they could quickly jump in, and have an intimate night with her.

While they're in this whole "Friendship" stage, they'll try soo hard to scare the woman away, from a potential romantic relationship with other men, whom they could never lace the boots of. They'll try to convince her, of how bad the guy is, and that things are moving too quickly between her and this new guy.

Soo despicable they are.

And finally, Cucks:

Everybodys favourite loser. We all know, what and who, cucks are. As for those of you who dont know, a cuck is someone who doesn't care and mind if his wife, is getting fingered by another man. The reason being, they simply can't live without that cheating woman, or they dont think they could pull another like her.

Cuck, is also a description of a man, who doesn't object to a female member of his family, marrying and breeding for another race.

Now, what all three of these types of men have in common is they seek the love and approval of women.....regardless if those women have rejected their romantic advances, or have cheated on them. This is how they are, and this is how they operate.

Its because of men like these having power, that we see, gender relations between men and women, so bad in the West.

Yeah, their are also Farahs (of course) who fall in this.
 
Last edited:

Mckenzie

We star in movies NASA pay to watch
VIP
An incel with irrational hate for women is also just as bad as them. Atleast those guys aren't harming society and killing ppl.
 

Macalin M

Out here
upload_2019-9-11_21-27-53.jpeg
 

Arma

GRAND Wizard of MJ SIXIIR
VIP
An incel with irrational hate for women is also just as bad as them. Atleast those guys aren't harming society and killing ppl.

True. Incels are a whole other thread, themselves. They're just losers, that have never had a whiff of punan1 juice.
 

Arma

GRAND Wizard of MJ SIXIIR
VIP
You had me until you added white knight. If a woman and a man are fighting, would you just let him beat her up?

Hold on a minute. I thought, men and women were equal? Surely then, if a woman thinks she can go toe to toe with a guy, who are we to get in her way?
 

Lostbox

「Immortal Sage」| Qabil-fluid
VIP
I not that complicated as you make it out to be. I just some guys that need more self respect and better self esteem. Why can't you guys right essays on how to help improve the community or something more useful? This is such a trivial matter. Also, I don't really understand how guys can be struggling with women with when the standards are so low
 

VixR

Veritas
The truest thing you can say about these categories is that they’re all made-up, comical exaggerations, that don’t actually exist in reality. Any man who speaks up for a woman is a “white night”, if once or 1000 times. Any man who obliges a woman is a cuck.

The incel is the only iteration of this that actually exists in real life.

The rest are new-age insults towards men who raise their children, are in stable relationships with women, and aren’t grade-A losers. These such insults are typically perpetuated by lesser men.

Another example of this is “Beta Bucks”, which is a term these type of men unironically call high-earning men by, whilst admitting the source of their insecurity towards them in the same breath.
 
How does being in an interracial relationship and having another man’s babies make your male relatives cucks? :gucciwhat::gucciwhat:
 

Tukraq

VIP
The truest thing you can say about these categories is that they’re all made-up, comical exaggerations, that don’t actually exist in reality. Any man who speaks up for a woman is a “white night”, if once or 1000 times. Any man who obliges a woman is a cuck.

The incel is the only iteration of this that actually exists in real life.

The rest are new-age insults towards men who raise their children, are in stable relationships with women, and aren’t grade-A losers. These such insults are typically perpetuated by lesser men.

Another example of this is “Beta Bucks”, which is a term these type of men unironically call high-earning men by, whilst admitting the source of their insecurity towards them in the same breath.
you can be rich and not beta bucks though and as many rich guys are alpha fucks, the term is not for high earning men as a whole
 

VixR

Veritas
you can be rich and not beta bucks though and as many rich guys are alpha fucks, the term is not for high earning men as a whole
Yes, it is. It’s a disparaging term for high-earning men who’re family-oriented.

“Beta Bucks” are high-earning men with families who’s financial status, “Bucks”, is characterized right there within their name, but as “Beta” for the fact that they’re family men.

Meanwhile, “Alpha Fucks”, are supposedly high-earning, but not so much that it’s characterized within the name itself. They’re characterized for the fact that they’re fucking everything that moves, which is “Alpha”.
 

Tukraq

VIP
Yes, it is. It’s a disparaging term for high-earning men who’re family-oriented.

“Beta Bucks” are high-earning men with families who’s financial status, “Bucks”, is characterized right there within their name, but as “Beta” for the fact that they’re family men.

Meanwhile, “Alpha Fucks”, are supposedly high-earning, but not so much that it’s characterized within the name itself. They’re characterized for the fact that they’re fucking everything that moves, which is “Alpha”.
I see it more about romanticism than “family” it’s more about is your significant other with you for the money only ie beta bucks or would she be with you even if you lost it all tommorow ie alpha fucks, where she is with you regardless of your financial situation
 
Top