Warrior-gene

:ooh:
Imagine this gene with high testosterone.
iu
 

Samaalic Era

QurboExit
Monoamine oxidase A aka warrior- gene is a gene that makes men more violent and men with this gene are more prone to adhd and other anti personality disorder, and also some ethnic groups have it more than other ethnic groups.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/scient...the-extreme-warrior-gene-a-reality-check/amp/

https://www.tremr.com/Duck-Rabbit/african-americans-possess-violence-gene-researchers-find
Im sure Somalis must have this gene sxb, It is an interesting piece of research:ohhh:
 
This is a far too complex of a subject to merely narrow down to genetics.
Socio-economic status and upbrining has a greater influence on aggressive behaviour and violence.
Here, Here, Here

The article itself says "A breakthrough emerged in 2002 when Caspi and colleagues find that individuals with a 2R or 3R version of the gene exhibited aggression, but only when they had difficult upbringings"
So the fact that the difference between black and white European is a mere 15% clearly shows it has less to do with genetics but socio economics status and upbringing, and this is without taking in account Single mother rate in AA's and the history black people have been through in the US, there are black people alive today that lived in the Jim Crow era.

Plus this study was conducted on a really small scale and wouldn't pass any peer review.

Sabo, Hu and Hamer (1998) found among 539 whites and 52 blacks that 59.1 percent of blacks had it and 33.1 percent of whites had it.

Beaver et al. (2013) found that 52.3 percent of blacks had it and 37 percent of whites had it among 2,574 whites and 164 blacks.

Rosenberg et al. (2006) found 54.1 percent of blacks and 36.1 percent of whites among 37 blacks and 274 whites.

37, 52 and 164 is nowhere near to be considered valid.
 
Very interesting read. But this is not significant enough.
Plus this doesnt even seem like a Scientific research but more of a circlejerk article between white racist to feel more superior
 
Though MAOA is associated with risk-taking and aggressive behavior in Caucasians, we have to remember correlation doesn't imply causation. The gene is most definitely related to other unmeasured factors because the gene-environment intersection is very complicated.

It is analogous to the misconceptions about the role of testosterone in the body. For example, testosterone doesn't cause aggression, but it amplifies when the neurons fire off in the amygdala, where it finds most reception.

The more experience you have with aggression, the less it is dependent on hormones, and the more it is a function of social learning.
 

T1a

Oberbefehlshaber der Somalier Genetik Gruppe
I am sure I have this gene. It is said that my ggg-grandfather fought in many skirmishes against Ethiopian clans, stealing and impregnating many of their women as war booty.
 
This is a far too complex of a subject to merely narrow down to genetics.
Socio-economic status and upbrining has a greater influence on aggressive behaviour and violence.
Here, Here, Here

The article itself says "A breakthrough emerged in 2002 when Caspi and colleagues find that individuals with a 2R or 3R version of the gene exhibited aggression, but only when they had difficult upbringings"
So the fact that the difference between black and white European is a mere 15% clearly shows it has less to do with genetics but socio economics status and upbringing, and this is without taking in account Single mother rate in AA's and the history black people have been through in the US, there are black people alive today that lived in the Jim Crow era.

Plus this study was conducted on a really small scale and wouldn't pass any peer review.

Sabo, Hu and Hamer (1998) found among 539 whites and 52 blacks that 59.1 percent of blacks had it and 33.1 percent of whites had it.

Beaver et al. (2013) found that 52.3 percent of blacks had it and 37 percent of whites had it among 2,574 whites and 164 blacks.

Rosenberg et al. (2006) found 54.1 percent of blacks and 36.1 percent of whites among 37 blacks and 274 whites.

37, 52 and 164 is nowhere near to be considered valid.
They need to take some samples from the Balkans. We'll see record-breaking numbers lmao.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top