US & Ukraine vote AGAINST anti-Nazi resolution proposed by Russia at UN General Assembly, eyebrows raised as Germany abstains

[Omar del Sur]

Considering he did a speech where he invited members of the American National Socialist party I believe it would be fair to say he wasn't against them or for them. You keep pushing this whole west vs russia and china narrative but I refuse to entertain it. They are all enemies of the Muslim Ummah. Just because Malcolm met with fidel doesn't mean he is a communist or a supporter of their ideals.

Whether you like my viewpoint or not, I am promoting a practical and tested way of undercutting Western imperialism. China is not invading Muslim countries. China is not forcing Westernization or sinicization on Muslim countries.

There are millions of Muslims in the Muslim world who are with me in my position. Almost everyone on SomaliSpot is posting from the West and so of course there is a Western tilt. Plus there's the Zionist tilt.

Furthermore it is factually incorrect to say that Malcolm X wasn't opposed to Nazis.

No objective analysis can read this as a friendly letter.

"Telegram to George Lincoln Rockwell (Leader of the American Nazi Party)
Malcolm X

1965

This is to warn you that I am no longer held in check from fighting white supremacists by Elijah Muhammad's separatist Black Muslim movement, and that if your present racist agitation against our people there in Alabama causes physical harm to Reverend King or any other black Americans who are only attempting to enjoy their rights as free human beings, that you and your Ku Klux Klan friends will be met with maximum physical retaliation from those of us who are not hand-cuffed by the disarming philosophy of nonviolence, and who believe in asserting our right of self-defense -- by any means necessary."

I also heard a speech where Malcolm X spoke against neonazis. I haven't been able to find the speech but from that letter you can see that he is clearly not for them. The whole point of that letter is to say that he is ready to fight them.

 

[Omar del Sur]

bush was by far the worst
and he wasnt even in control he was dick cheyneys puppet

Bush was definitely bad but I don't think there's any real difference between them.

Bush started the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. This created a huge backlash. It's not like Obama could engage in what Bush did on the same scale after what Bush did. It's not that Obama was actually different, it was that there was constraint on what he actually could do. Same with Trump. Trump was neocon just like the other two but its hard to fight wars on a George Bush scale when your own country is on the verge of a civil war.

 

[Omar del Sur]

Okay, I found the Malcolm X speech where he talks about neo-nazis.


You cannot possibly listen to this and consider this objectively and say that Malcolm X was for the neo-nazis. He is specifically attacking the kkk and neo-nazis and you can see how hostile he is towards them.

 

[Omar del Sur]

It is factually inaccurate to say that Malcolm X was for the neonazis or neutral towards them. The Nation of Islam did meet with them because both were agreed on racial separatism and so there was the possibility they might work something out because they both agreed on separating the races. That doesn't actually mean that Malcolm X was for them. If you discuss a business arrangement with someone that doesn't actually mean you are for them- it's a business arrangement. Furthermore, it can be seen from the letter that Malcolm X wanted a more hostile stance towards the white supremacists.

It makes no sense to claim that Malcolm X was neutral or sympathetic towards white supremacist ideology. His ideology and white supremacist ideology are inherently opposed to each other.