US & Ukraine vote AGAINST anti-Nazi resolution proposed by Russia at UN General Assembly, eyebrows raised as Germany abstains

[Omar del Sur]

US & Ukraine vote AGAINST anti-Nazi resolution proposed by Russia at UN General Assembly, eyebrows raised as Germany abstains

US & Ukraine vote AGAINST anti-Nazi resolution proposed by Russia at UN General Assembly, eyebrows raised as Germany abstains

A Russian resolution condemning the “glorification of Nazism” was passed by the UN General Assembly, on Wednesday, with overwhelming support, though, remarkably. both the US and Ukraine made a point of voting against the motion

www.rt.com

 

[Omar del Sur]

@Ebuo why do you qashin this? you are pro-naziism?

 

[Aurelian]

This resolution was meant to reduce freedom of speech and and expression as well as it being a Russian pushed resolution that likely was an attack on the Ukrainian government, which they've baselessly accused of fascism and Nazism, not actually to combat modern nazism and totalitarianism.

 

[Aurelian]

@Ebuo why do you qashin this? you are pro-naziism?

No but it was obvious this pro-totalitarian regime thread. You knew about this resolution being Russia's b.s with cool name "Anti-nazism" and everyone who is against will be a nazi

 

[Omar del Sur]

No but it was obvious this pro-totalitarian regime thread. You knew about this resolution being Russia's b.s with cool name "Anti-nazism" and everyone who is against will be a nazi

This is exactly what I've been talking about with people here- you froth at the mouth when it comes to Russia and China but you don't have that same attitude when it comes to the US. That energy is reserved for those who oppose the West. A foreign policy of being the white man's attack dog.

 

[Aurelian]

This is exactly what I've been talking about with people here- you froth at the mouth when it comes to Russia and China but you don't have that same attitude when it comes to the US. That energy is reserved for those who oppose the West. A foreign policy of being the white man's attack dog.

All the dictatorships agreeing and most of the free world abstaining should give you the hint. There is something wrong with resolution, it isn't about nazism most of western Europe is against nazism.

 

[Never Broke Again]

Germany should get back western poland back and also reunite with Austria and get back some of the parts France took

 

[Al Muslim]

What kind of dumb resolution is this? What did they seek to accomplish?

 

[Omar del Sur]

What kind of dumb resolution is this? What did they seek to accomplish?

Your words don't match your avatar.

 

[Al Muslim]

Your words don't match your avatar.

Care to elaborate?

 

[Omar del Sur]

Care to elaborate?

Malcolm X was not pro-Nazi. He was against those kinds of groups. I heard him in a speech speaking against them and I saw a quote where he was kind of threatening them.

 

[Al Muslim]

Malcolm X was not pro-Nazi. He was against those kinds of groups. I heard him in a speech speaking against them and I saw a quote where he was kind of threatening them.

Firstly to the extent of my knowledge Malcolm X neither supported or was against them. Secondly I am not wrong when I said that this is a stupid resolution. What do they seek to achieve by "condemning" something that existed over 70 years ago? It's just a pathetic attempt by Russia to keep up their "saviour of Europe" image.

 

[madaxweyne]

All the dictatorships agreeing and most of the free world abstaining should give you the hint. There is something wrong with resolution, it isn't about nazism most of western Europe is against nazism.

nazism or white supremacy most western countries support white identitarianism and white supremacy or the idea of white superiority over none whites or some form of it echoed by Charles darwins natural selection theory which led to the development of social Darwinism and eventually nazism

 

[Omar del Sur]

Firstly to the extent of my knowledge Malcolm X neither supported or was against them. Secondly I am not wrong when I said that this is a stupid resolution. What do they seek to achieve by "condemning" something that existed over 70 years ago? It's just a pathetic attempt by Russia to keep up their "saviour of Europe" image.

You don't think Malcolm X would be against Nazis? I can tell you he was but I'm surprised it would need to be clarified. And if you think that ideology is gone, take a trip to 4chan or look at some pictures of January 6.

Also, why are you siding with the West over Russia? Malcolm X would not have done that.

People are taking Malcolm X as something like a poster without having really studied his ideas.

 

[Omar del Sur]

Birds of a feather flock together. That man was not pro-Western.

 

[Omar del Sur]

I want to make it very clear that Trump is a Freemason because I am convinced that the "Trump is fighting the deep state" hoax has convinced people that being a neocon is "fighting the Illuminati"- that people are being "based and redpilled" by following the exact same lines as neoconservatives.

If you say in theory the West is bad but in practice you align with the West in relation with the West's opponents then in practice you are no different than a neocon.

 

[Omar del Sur]

also, I just want to post this to clarify as to whether there is any difference between any of these neocon administrations:

 

[Al Muslim]

Birds of a feather flock together. That man was not pro-Western.

Considering he did a speech where he invited members of the American National Socialist party I believe it would be fair to say he wasn't against them or for them. You keep pushing this whole west vs russia and china narrative but I refuse to entertain it. They are all enemies of the Muslim Ummah. Just because Malcolm met with fidel doesn't mean he is a communist or a supporter of their ideals.

 

[Royalflush]

also, I just want to post this to clarify as to whether there is any difference between any of these neocon administrations:

View attachment 167819

bush was by far the worst
and he wasnt even in control he was dick cheyneys puppet

 

[Omar del Sur]

Considering he did a speech where he invited members of the American National Socialist party I believe it would be fair to say he wasn't against them or for them. You keep pushing this whole west vs russia and china narrative but I refuse to entertain it. They are all enemies of the Muslim Ummah. Just because Malcolm met with fidel doesn't mean he is a communist or a supporter of their ideals.

You should listen to the message to the grassroots speech and study his work generally.

He did not have this position of "both sides are bad". He was pro-China, he was pro-Cuba, he was anti-Western, he was sympathetic to Mao Zedong. In fact, his thought had similarities with Maoism.

It's not that he actually was in favor of Communism. It was that he was in favor of them as a sort of counter to the West.

Furthermore, he didn't just meet with Fidel Castro. You can see in the picture how much he liked being with Fidel Castro.

This is how different he was than how you are portraying things- in his message to the grassroots speech, he praises China and Cuba.

The idea that all kuffar is the same is not actually correct. The Quran itself, for example, distinguishes between the kuffar who fight you and those who don't.

That is one point.

Another point is this- crimes against non-Muslims are still crimes. I'm sure people
remember the hadith where the women went to hell because of starving a cat, if I remember correctly.

Therefore, when we consider, the crimes of the US we should consider the total criminality and not only the crimes against Muslims. Even if we only consider the crimes against Muslims, it's a lot but when we consider the total crimes..... it is a huge list.

No objective analysis can look at the crimes committed by the US and by China and conclude that both are the same. The US is clearly a way bigger criminal. It is like comparing someone who steals a candy bar with a serial killer.