Going back and forth with you is pointless. You called following the salaf cancerous. And proof for your lack of knowledge is linking the madhab of Salafiyaah to Khawarij groups like al-Shabab and ISIS, when in fact, Salafis are the arch-nemesis of Khawarij groups, whether they are rebels or individuals who incite it from their couches.
Before you speak without knowledge, learn what the Salaf and Salafiyah are. You're a grown adult, and slandering the Salaf is akin to saying to stop listening to the three early generations of Muslims, which includes the first generation comprising the Prophet and his companions, and what their students and subsequent generations followed.
Cease associating Khawarij ideology, which involves declaring rulers as non-believers and seeking to overthrow regimes, with Salafiyah. Learn the distinction. Your disagreement with the Khawarij you encountered should not be mistaken for issues with Salafis.
Itโs so fascinating to see how easily you surrender from intellectual discussions by resorting to childish insults, this shows how shallow you are.
You are casually committing major nullifiers of Islam without actually knowing it, this is what happens when you try to engage in discussions that are above your pay grade.
Stick to gender wars kiddo and leave the affairs of the Deen to those who are intelligent enough to comprehend it.
The Salafi movement was not ordained or followed out by our beloved Muhammed (saw), at least this we can agree on, yes?
You know it's funny, the Shia today are considered cancer by your very movement today, hell it wouldn't suprise me if you thought the same.
Yet the Shia idealogy exists because of their interpretation of the three generations after the prophets (saw) passing, it's like irony is a lost concept on you lot.