Tried Something

[Lightshow]

Beyond the general use of the English language and dialogue setting (as that is already a combinationally narrow), I don't see how my writing is similar to other literary texts beyond what is provincially found between two random books on a library shelf. It does not fail what people in the scientific world call the null hypothesis.

It's like saying a Chinese looks similar to a Somali because they generally have four limbs, are bipedal, have a head, etc., when what you are implying is a stronger connection (otherwise there is no point in bringing it up). They share human characteristics, but nothing special beyond that. That is why pointing out the similarities is moot in all things relative, unless you're making a case that all writings have similarities, which is objectively true but really lacks focus and meaning beyond linguistic science that delves into the structural network relations of language and its use. And frankly, I did not create this thread to engage in that sort of literary nonsense, since I don't read it. I'm sure you can find others who want to engage in Harry Potter with you somewhere else, though.

You got caught out my nigga just own up to it and stop writing thesis to prove your innocence.

 

[The alchemist]

That's not what I said. I don't actually want to discuss literature with you. Just that the themes and structure of your writing is common in literature. But it's hard to explain to someone both uninterested and not well versed in the topic.

I'm sure you comprehended what I wrote and which implies I understand exactly what you mean, but basically, saying you were way out of your element to state such claims. My text was a response to your backhanded, nonsensical comment about seeing something like it many places. But let's move on and don't derail my thread. This is not about how you read fictional literature.

 

[The alchemist]

You got caught out my nigga just own up to it and stop writing thesis to prove your innocence.

Actually, you're making a bigger claim than hers because you got the balls, imbecile. See, I needed to check her quick on that nonsense, but here is clearly a buffoon who claims I plagarized my text. Bring evidence right away, motherfucker. Bring the text that says I picked it up from somewhere. These are very demonstrable, POS.

Bum think just because he can't write for shit people had to have fabricated theirs. Tone down your inadequate feelings of jealousy, that shit is not pretty. Not everyone is at your level and you need to humble yourself instead of accusing people of taking things from somewhere or implying the so called ubiquity of such text around.

@Taintedlove, now you understand why I responded the way I did? This is exactly why I stomped your silly comment out quickly. And I put you with this guy since I doubt your sincerity and check you on your backhanded compliment that implies a lot of things entirely and utterly unsubstantial.

And to end this bullshit and make an example out of you so no one ever tries me without ever having sound proof; let's run it through a plagiarism tool, which is a technology that actually goes down into how much of my text "recemble" other texts, by structure, form, word use, style, and plenty of other parameters that should at least produce somethng minor if was taken from somewhere or been an unoriginal inspiration that conforms to common writing tropes. It runs through millions of literature that your petty minds can't:

Oh, what do you know, it references that it was exactly the same as one source, this thread alone. Meaning, it found similarity, but it was this exact text linked to this site. Showing it effectively finds similarity, yet it only found my writing alone -- the only authentic and original. These plagiarism tools literally scan through millions of texts, meaning your little memory and syntax understanding are nothing compared to it, and they cannot see similarity. And the most famous and common ones are the first ones to spot, by the way.

I told you bums why it is impossible for my text to be derived from anything or, frankly, similar beyond randomness, since I only used my mind and I don't delve into fictional stories such that I wrote at all. It means my brain cannot have picked up biases, clearly demonstrated here.

But to quell your jealousy further, I asked ChatGPT, which is essentially an effective tool to compare texts, as it is an LLM that can also run through millions of texts and break down any similarity based on the academic standard of plagiarism:

Now, to you, @Lightshow, bum, exactly like I wrote in the response, you started your ignorant accusations, basically exactly what I wrote, the machine validates my claims. That none of my text is actually similar to anything based on random fucking shit that is actually genetically unrelated and is like saying all text generes are similar, which is moot. Millions of media have used the word "fragmented," but the use of the English language, literally using a word, does not mean much at all.

Here we have two people, one implying I had much influence from the literature sinking my writing that was entierly auntehnitc and impossible to be derived given that it was straight from my dome piece, as some fucking typical fan writer nonsense that lacks originality and authenticity, instead of giving due credit for the orignal work, and moving on. On the other and, you had another loser who was more shameless that quite openly claimed I was caught in inauthentic peddling. And to let you know, I enjoy debunking liars because I will defend myself against those wicked lowlives that tries to smear my way of being.

I need to dispel liars and decapitate their heads. I'll end people who ever try to question my authenticity. Don't ever imply that I bite from others without evidence, fools.

And this is expected from uneducated people who can't fathom how someone other than them can produce something, since they can't with the, nice text, but I have seen it in many types of places, and another, oh, bro give up, she caught you. Dumbasses.

Let's run that through others:

I did not even use grammar tools since I wanted to keep my text fresh as f*ck. That means I can easily polish it through my own writing alone but did not want to make it rigid in style. So the text actually does not have writing issues, it's just that Grammarly is conforming to one type of writing style that I did not want to even touch my text. However, that is besides the point. The plagiarism is at 0%, once again.

On to the next one:

Oh, wait. No similarity...

More, motherfuckers:

Oh, what do you know, exactly the same as my text from this linked site. And another one found one common word "in tandem" from a dictionary, lmao. That is the only similarity you will ever have. You will find every single word I have ever written in every dictionary. That is clearly not plagiarism.

Let's do it last time because this is actually fun:

Oh, to let you know, I know what goes into these things because I am involved in the academic scene, meaning that we can easily sniff out texts that are taken from somewhere else, better than you guys understand. I might not read your choice of literature, but I am a competent person.

Don't ever try to imply that what I say is 100% not authentic ever again. Don't ever lie on my name and get off my dick. My thread is not a platform for you people to project your inadequacies onto me. I wrote that shit from my head alone. It's not even that significant but I will defend my honor against dishonourable people.

I'm a very authentic person and I am very open with my inspirations if I have any; I always cite my scientific quotations, or I link it if anyone ask where I get this or that from. Don't ever try your despicable wicked tactics again. They don't work against truth.

 

[The alchemist]

Now, don't derail my thread again. Don't even dare post if you have basic decency.

 

[The alchemist]

You see, I care about my reputation in writing original things because I delve into things on this forum that have academic consequences. That means, if I am a bullshitter, it is over, since that arena is all about validity, credibility (meaning you build up reputation through good rigorous conduct), and integrity. So don't be surprised, I had to make an example of you petty people who used your word cheaply, trying to tarnish my reputation, because somehow my text reflects your perceived self-perception of inadequacy. I'm sorry, but that is not my problem. Your projections are though, especially when you accuse me of being a fraud. Dont ever dare to do that. The audacity of some of you people is pathetic.

 

[Lightshow]

Actually, you're making a bigger claim than hers because you got the balls, imbecile. See, I needed to check her quick on that nonsense, but here is clearly a buffoon who claims I plagarized my text. Bring evidence right away, motherfucker. Bring the text that says I picked it up from somewhere. These are very demonstrable, POS.

Bum think just because he can't write for shit people had to have fabricated theirs. Tone down your inadequate feelings of jealousy, that shit is not pretty. Not everyone is at your level and you need to humble yourself instead of accusing people of taking things from somewhere or implying the so called ubiquity of such text around.

@Taintedlove, now you understand why I responded the way I did? This is exactly why I stomped your silly comment out quickly. And I put you with this guy since I doubt your sincerity and check you on your backhanded compliment that implies a lot of things entirely and utterly unsubstantial.

And to end this bullshit and make an example out of you so no one ever tries me without ever having sound proof; let's run it through a plagiarism tool, which is a technology that actually goes down into how much of my text "recemble" other texts, by structure, form, word use, style, and plenty of other parameters that should at least produce somethng minor if was taken from somewhere or been an unoriginal inspiration that conforms to common writing tropes. It runs through millions of literature that your petty minds can't:

View attachment 359314

Oh, what do you know, it references that it was exactly the same as one source, this thread alone. Meaning, it found similarity, but it was this exact text linked to this site. Showing it effectively finds similarity, yet it only found my writing alone -- the only authentic and original. These plagiarism tools literally scan through millions of texts, meaning your little memory and syntax understanding are nothing compared to it, and they cannot see similarity. And the most famous and common ones are the first ones to spot, by the way.

I told you bums why it is impossible for my text to be derived from anything or, frankly, similar beyond randomness, since I only used my mind and I don't delve into fictional stories such that I wrote at all. It means my brain cannot have picked up biases, clearly demonstrated here.

But to quell your jealousy further, I asked ChatGPT, which is essentially an effective tool to compare texts, as it is an LLM that can also run through millions of texts and break down any similarity based on the academic standard of plagiarism:

View attachment 359320
View attachment 359321

Now, to you, @Lightshow, bum, exactly like I wrote in the response, you started your ignorant accusations, basically exactly what I wrote, the machine validates my claims. That none of my text is actually similar to anything based on random fucking shit that is actually genetically unrelated and is like saying all text generes are similar, which is moot. Millions of media have used the word "fragmented," but the use of the English language, literally using a word, does not mean much at all.

Here we have two people, one implying I had much influence from the literature sinking my writing that was entierly auntehnitc and impossible to be derived given that it was straight from my dome piece, as some fucking typical fan writer nonsense that lacks originality and authenticity, instead of giving due credit for the orignal work, and moving on. On the other and, you had another loser who was more shameless that quite openly claimed I was caught in inauthentic peddling. And to let you know, I enjoy debunking liars because I will defend myself against those wicked lowlives that tries to smear my way of being.

I need to dispel liars and decapitate their heads. I'll end people who ever try to question my authenticity. Don't ever imply that I bite from others without evidence, fools.

And this is expected from uneducated people who can't fathom how someone other than them can produce something, since they can't with the, nice text, but I have seen it in many types of places, and another, oh, bro give up, she caught you. Dumbasses.

Let's run that through others:

View attachment 359318

I did not even use grammar tools since I wanted to keep my text fresh as f*ck. That means I can easily polish it through my own writing alone but did not want to make it rigid in style. So the text actually does not have writing issues, it's just that Grammarly is conforming to one type of writing style that I did not want to even touch my text. However, that is besides the point. The plagiarism is at 0%, once again.

On to the next one:

View attachment 359319

Oh, wait. No similarity...

More, motherfuckers:

View attachment 359322

Oh, what do you know, exactly the same as my text from this linked site. And another one found one common word "in tandem" from a dictionary, lmao. That is the only similarity you will ever have. You will find every single word I have ever written in every dictionary. That is clearly not plagiarism.

Let's do it last time because this is actually fun:
View attachment 359323


Oh, to let you know, I know what goes into these things because I am involved in the academic scene, meaning that we can easily sniff out texts that are taken from somewhere else, better than you guys understand. I might not read your choice of literature, but I am a competent person.

Don't ever try to imply that what I say is 100% not authentic ever again. Don't ever lie on my name and get off my dick. My thread is not a platform for you people to project your inadequacies onto me. I wrote that shit from my head alone. It's not even that significant but I will defend my honor against dishonourable people.

I'm a very authentic person and I am very open with my inspirations if I have any; I always cite my scientific quotations, or I link it if anyone ask where I get this or that from. Don't ever try your despicable wicked tactics again. They don't work against truth.

Whatever saxiib. You are a clever man, but your ego revolves around intellect and a need to prove your intelligence. Well done you are very intelligent.

Do you want another cookie?

 

[Basra]

Felt the need to randomly write something. I don't write ever, by the way, nor do I read this type of literature:

This physical reality is made up of billions of tiny pieces and yet is arranged into wholes, is what he thinks to himself, looking into his fiancée's beautiful, hopeful, smiling face. “Does she know I’m pieces moving in tandem?” He lightly smiles mournfully. Diana sees him as more than he is, a complete man that got things figured out. That optimistic reflection is what holds him together. What she sees through her eyes. The discrepancy of the two, both the figment of her love and his broken reality reminds Victor of the duality of life. Is he a fraud, a disintegrated person, or are both true? Celestial bodies move majestically in predictable forms, disciplined, prisintely. They are made up of sub-atomic particles that conform to no pattern. “Stochasticity” is what he thought. The whimsical way she entered his life with rays of passion, dichotomous from what he had lived before she randomly entered. “Nothing is ever random,” he thought.

Turning her head slightly, trying to meet his eyes desperately, indicating she sees him, or wants to, or thinks so, she says, “What are you thinking about?”

“Nothing. Only how beautiful you are.”

The End.

Sounds like what a Weed High strung eloquence genius writer would opine

 

[The alchemist]

Whatever saxiib. You are a clever man, but your ego revolves around intellect and a need to prove your intelligence. Well done you are very intelligent.

Do you want another cookie?

Jealousy and insecurities had you lying about me, abaha wasse. I had to showcase that you were messing with a real one, and I need to step on your necks for even flinching the wrong way thinking shit is sweet to poullute your lowlife ways in my prence trying to defile my reputation. Your inadequate intelligence is why you tried your futile bullshit, purely projecting. Have some decency and begone, your lying attempts were highlighted enough.

 

[The alchemist]

Sounds like what a Weed High strung eloquence genius writer would opine

View attachment 359334

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[Lightshow]

Jealousy and insecurities had you lying about me, abaha wasse. I had to showcase that you were messing with a real one, and I need to step on your necks for even flinching the wrong way thinking shit is sweet to poullute your lowlife ways in my prence trying to defile my reputation. Your inadequate intelligence is why you tried your futile bullshit, purely projecting. Have some decency and begone, your lying attempts were highlighted enough.

What good is intellect, if you are blinded by petty ego?

 

[cunug3aad]

Jealousy and insecurities had you lying about me, abaha wasse. I had to showcase that you were messing with a real one, and I need to step on your necks for even flinching the wrong way thinking shit is sweet to poullute your lowlife ways in my prence trying to defile my reputation. Your inadequate intelligence is why you tried your futile bullshit, purely projecting. Have some decency and begone, your lying attempts were highlighted enough.

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[The alchemist]

What good is intellect, if you are blinded by petty ego?

You lied about me, I dispelled that. Many things are wrong with you not to know the difference. Stop desperately sticking to other lies and respect yourself. It's unsightly.

You neither have intellect, have a broken ego that made you lie about me, lack integrity, and are bereft of any wisdom or self-awareness. That is you.

Jealousy is not a pretty thing and is an automatic admission of attribution of perceived superiority to the other person, where their shine is constantly problematized, instead of acknowledging that it's all about your internal perception of inadequacy. That is psychology 101.

You tried your bullshit, it did not work, I put you in your place, now get the out of here.

 

[Taintedlove]

Actually, you're making a bigger claim than hers because you got the balls, imbecile. See, I needed to check her quick on that nonsense, but here is clearly a buffoon who claims I plagarized my text. Bring evidence right away, motherfucker. Bring the text that says I picked it up from somewhere. These are very demonstrable, POS.

Bum think just because he can't write for shit people had to have fabricated theirs. Tone down your inadequate feelings of jealousy, that shit is not pretty. Not everyone is at your level and you need to humble yourself instead of accusing people of taking things from somewhere or implying the so called ubiquity of such text around.

@Taintedlove, now you understand why I responded the way I did? This is exactly why I stomped your silly comment out quickly. And I put you with this guy since I doubt your sincerity and check you on your backhanded compliment that implies a lot of things entirely and utterly unsubstantial.

And to end this bullshit and make an example out of you so no one ever tries me without ever having sound proof; let's run it through a plagiarism tool, which is a technology that actually goes down into how much of my text "recemble" other texts, by structure, form, word use, style, and plenty of other parameters that should at least produce somethng minor if was taken from somewhere or been an unoriginal inspiration that conforms to common writing tropes. It runs through millions of literature that your petty minds can't:

View attachment 359314

Oh, what do you know, it references that it was exactly the same as one source, this thread alone. Meaning, it found similarity, but it was this exact text linked to this site. Showing it effectively finds similarity, yet it only found my writing alone -- the only authentic and original. These plagiarism tools literally scan through millions of texts, meaning your little memory and syntax understanding are nothing compared to it, and they cannot see similarity. And the most famous and common ones are the first ones to spot, by the way.

I told you bums why it is impossible for my text to be derived from anything or, frankly, similar beyond randomness, since I only used my mind and I don't delve into fictional stories such that I wrote at all. It means my brain cannot have picked up biases, clearly demonstrated here.

But to quell your jealousy further, I asked ChatGPT, which is essentially an effective tool to compare texts, as it is an LLM that can also run through millions of texts and break down any similarity based on the academic standard of plagiarism:

View attachment 359320
View attachment 359321

Now, to you, @Lightshow, bum, exactly like I wrote in the response, you started your ignorant accusations, basically exactly what I wrote, the machine validates my claims. That none of my text is actually similar to anything based on random fucking shit that is actually genetically unrelated and is like saying all text generes are similar, which is moot. Millions of media have used the word "fragmented," but the use of the English language, literally using a word, does not mean much at all.

Here we have two people, one implying I had much influence from the literature sinking my writing that was entierly auntehnitc and impossible to be derived given that it was straight from my dome piece, as some fucking typical fan writer nonsense that lacks originality and authenticity, instead of giving due credit for the orignal work, and moving on. On the other and, you had another loser who was more shameless that quite openly claimed I was caught in inauthentic peddling. And to let you know, I enjoy debunking liars because I will defend myself against those wicked lowlives that tries to smear my way of being.

I need to dispel liars and decapitate their heads. I'll end people who ever try to question my authenticity. Don't ever imply that I bite from others without evidence, fools.

And this is expected from uneducated people who can't fathom how someone other than them can produce something, since they can't with the, nice text, but I have seen it in many types of places, and another, oh, bro give up, she caught you. Dumbasses.

Let's run that through others:

View attachment 359318

I did not even use grammar tools since I wanted to keep my text fresh as f*ck. That means I can easily polish it through my own writing alone but did not want to make it rigid in style. So the text actually does not have writing issues, it's just that Grammarly is conforming to one type of writing style that I did not want to even touch my text. However, that is besides the point. The plagiarism is at 0%, once again.

On to the next one:

View attachment 359319

Oh, wait. No similarity...

More, motherfuckers:

View attachment 359322

Oh, what do you know, exactly the same as my text from this linked site. And another one found one common word "in tandem" from a dictionary, lmao. That is the only similarity you will ever have. You will find every single word I have ever written in every dictionary. That is clearly not plagiarism.

Let's do it last time because this is actually fun:
View attachment 359323


Oh, to let you know, I know what goes into these things because I am involved in the academic scene, meaning that we can easily sniff out texts that are taken from somewhere else, better than you guys understand. I might not read your choice of literature, but I am a competent person.

Don't ever try to imply that what I say is 100% not authentic ever again. Don't ever lie on my name and get off my dick. My thread is not a platform for you people to project your inadequacies onto me. I wrote that shit from my head alone. It's not even that significant but I will defend my honor against dishonourable people.

I'm a very authentic person and I am very open with my inspirations if I have any; I always cite my scientific quotations, or I link it if anyone ask where I get this or that from. Don't ever try your despicable wicked tactics again. They don't work against truth.

Warya point to me where I said you plagiarized someone else? A
Or that you copied from else where? What you actually wrote is unique but the the themes and structure of your writing common in literature. But again, you seem clearly uninterested in discussing such a topic.

 

[Lightshow]

You lied about me, I dispelled that. Many things are wrong with you not to know the difference. Stop desperately sticking to other lies and respect yourself. It's unsightly.

You neither have intellect, have a broken ego that made you lie about me, lack integrity, and are bereft of any wisdom or self-awareness. That is you.

Jealousy is not a pretty thing and is an automatic admission of attribution of perceived superiority to the other person, where their shine is constantly problematized, instead of acknowledging that it's all about your internal perception of inadequacy. That is psychology 101.

You tried your bullshit, it did not work, I put you in your place, now get the out of here.

You know what, Alchemist? I never expected that one lighthearted jab would spark a full dissertation, screenshots, and a man ready to go to war over forum banter. That alone says more than I ever could.


No one’s questioning your intelligence you’ve made sure of that. But the real test of intellect isn’t how well you write or cite sources; it’s how well you handle being challenged, even jokingly.


Anyway, you’ve made your point loudly and at length. We get it. I’ll leave it at this: real confidence doesn’t need to stomp on others to feel tall.


Peace.

 

[The alchemist]

Warya point to me where I said you plagiarized someone else? A
Or that you copied from else where? What you actually wrote is unique but the the themes and structure of your writing common in literature. But again, you seem clearly uninterested in discussing such a topic.

Why do you think the buffon that responded to me thought you meant that exactly? It was because of you're analogously saying,"You're pretty but you look like the average woman I have met" bullshit.

I did not say you said I plagiarized, I clearly said you did not, but the guy who responded did basing off of your comment that was very backhanded and it can be viewed as such because you essentially claimed it was so generic you saw similarities everywhere, reason for me having to place things in their proper context, giving you the mini lecture on how you're off. Do you get it now?

 

[Lightshow]

Why do you think the buffon that responded to me thought you meant that exactly? It was because of you're analogously saying,"You're pretty but you look like the average woman I have met bullshit."

I did not say you said I plagiarized, I clearly said you did not, but the guy who responded did basing off of your comment that was very backhanded and it can be viewed as such because you essentially claimed it was so generic you saw similarities everywhere, reason for me having to place things in their proper context, giving you the mini lecture on how you're off. Do you get it now?

I genuinely considered you as one to be admired on this forum. But you have proven yourself to be a snotty egotistical little turd right here. Many will see this and silently agree with me. Well done.

 

[Taintedlove]

Why do you think the buffon that responded to me thought you meant that exactly? It was because of you're analogously saying,"You're pretty but you look like the average woman I have met bullshit."

I did not say you said I plagiarized, I clearly said you did not, but the guy who responded did basing off of your comment that was very backhanded and it can be viewed as such because you essentially claimed it was so generic you saw similarities everywhere, reason for me having to place things in their proper context, giving you the mini lecture on how you're off. Do you get it now?

He probably just misinterpreted me. And it's more like "you're pretty, you remind me of this model". I never claimed it was generic, I thought the writing itself was captivating, but that the themes and structure are commonly used in literature. That's not a bad thing. I don't know why you're taking offense when you literally asked what we thought. Take a chill pill

 

[The alchemist]

You know what, Alchemist? I never expected that one lighthearted jab would spark a full dissertation, screenshots, and a man ready to go to war over forum banter. That alone says more than I ever could.


No one’s questioning your intelligence—you’ve made sure of that. But the real test of intellect isn’t how well you write or cite sources; it’s how well you handle being challenged, even jokingly.


Anyway, you’ve made your point—loudly and at length. We get it. I’ll leave it at this: real confidence doesn’t need to stomp on others to feel tall.


Peace.

I dealt with you the way liars are supposed to be stomped. This false concern trolling advice is your mental disconnection, not even comprehending a word I said. Which reflects your inability to internalize your problem, hence me having to deal with you trying to make your problems my problems in despicable ways.

 

[The alchemist]

I genuinely considered you as one to be admired on this forum. But you have proven yourself to be a snotty egotistical little turd right here. Many will see this and silently agree with me. Well done.

You lied about me, essentially saying I was a fraud who plagiarized my text. Get the out of here with this fake love crap. I don't know you, nigga, because I don't befriend people who lie on me and assasiname my character. I don't give a shit how much you admired me, because at some point that turned to bitter jelousy that came in the way of lies that tried to pass me off as a fraud, you piece of shit. No one who ever does that ever admired me. Go and take your pollution somewhere else.

 

[Lightshow]

He probably just misinterpreted me. And it's more like "you're pretty, you remind me of this model". I never claimed it was generic, I thought the writing itself was captivating, but that the themes and structure are commonly used in literature. That's not a bad thing. I don't know why you're taking offense when you literally asked what we thought. Take a chill pill

Let's all walk on eggshells shall we. Lmao