The Vaccines Are Sus

[TheManWhoIsAlive]

Someone said the threads are boring, so we're gonna make it real hot real fkin fast.

Big Pharma, Gates, Big Tech.

What do these three things have in common?

They rep the vax heavy fam.

There's a lot of suspect things to address guys.

1. Not FDA/Health Canada approved. Only emergency use.

So what's the problem you may be asking? Well, if it's emergency use, then that would suggest that this is a situation where we have exhausted all resources.

Problem is: we haven't.

Ivermectin. If you never heard this drug, it apparently acts as a form of medicine that stops viral replication.

To put it simply, there's a difference between getting in contact with the virus and getting the disease. You need the virus to spread in order for the inflammation that's actually deadly to some people to work. Can't happen without viral replication. If it's halted, then your immune system will have enough control to contain the virus and eliminate it.

So why is this important. Well if ivermectin works, then there's no basis for emergency use of the vaccine anymore.

I'll continue the rest of the thread with the rest of the posts. But I'm gonna wake y'all asses up today fam.

@qwertyuiop

 

[TheManWhoIsAlive]

As a continuation of the first point, Ivermectin as a subject has been under censorship. There has been scientists, such as Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Bret Weinstein and Dr. Pierre Kory who have all talk about both Ivermectin as a viable drug and the censorship of talking about it.

Go ahead and try to go on YouTube and see what they say. The videos will all talk about how it's a myth and not to be taken seriously.

Then go to the comments and see the sensible reaction to the thousands of people who know that it works.

Ex.
Next post will address the next problem.

 

[TheManWhoIsAlive]

Disclaimer before I continue: I am not an anti-vaxxer. I ain't a fan of InfoWars. I'm not a nutjob who thinks a micro chip is being installed in the arm.

2. No Liabilities to the Pharma corps if shit goes wrong

Now riddle me this:

If the vaccine is so safe, why can't I sue the bastard who may or may not get me fkd up if something goes wrong?

Why is an experimental form of medicine (technically true as the clinical trials end in 2023) pushed to the public and there's no repercussions to the manufacturers who made them?

Look at this shit with Argentina:


What the actual fk is going on here?!


3. Contradictory explanations and expectations

Before I outline the raw stupidity of this situation (again, for those who are at risk for Covid-19, by all means take the vax, it makes sense, it should go to those who are more at risk for death), let me explain what this vaccine is supposed to do:

The mRNA vaccine has genetic material (mRNA) encased in a nano-lipid particle (like a cell wall). The mRNA, which is the genetic material that gets transcribed into proteins, codes for spike proteins from the SARS-Cov-2 virus. It's supposed to stay within the arm, where it would get transcribed, and the resultant reaction from the body is an immune response. As the spike proteins don't contain the entire virus (obviously), they can at most, attach to the receptors of cells, no invade it. This means that when it comes to B-Cells (antibodies) and T-Cells (which attack infected cells), only antibodies for the spike protein are produced.

So, there are sensible questions to ask:

1. If I got the virus before, or through other means, have the antibodies and T-Cells, do I need to take the vaccine? The obvious answer is no, as it'll just give you the same damn result. However...

Check out this bullshit:


Her rationale: "just because you had the virus doesn't mean you won't get it again."

So, using that logic, just because I got the vaccine, doesn't mean I won't get the virus. I guess she's right, because:

Dangerous Delta COVID-19 Variant Infecting Vaccinated Adults In Israel

The World Health Organization is recommending that everyone, even the fully vaccinated, continue to wear masks because of the highly transmissible variant.

www.huffpost.com

Probably has to do with the fact that when a virus mutates, the most probably thing to change is the damn spike protein.

2. Is the spike protein safe? If not, then why is the vaccine considered safe?

The spike protein is cytotoxic. Which basically means toxic to cells. Now this doesn't necessarily mean that the vaccine is bad. After all, it doesn't spread throughout your body right? Right?

3. Does the vaccine go through biodistribution upon injection?

Well...

Pfizer report_Japanese government.pdf

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) 2.6.4 薬物動態試験の概要文. マスキング箇所：調整中. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF FIGURES...

www.docdroid.net

You decide on that one.

Also if you go to Twitter now, you'll see both Moderna and Pfizer are trending, lol

 

[TheManWhoIsAlive]

In about 3 months or so, shit is about to get real interesting.

Can't wait to see what happens. Also, you should probably learn a technical skill (or skills) to get prepared for the future, the jobs market is gonna change significantly by 2030.

 

[jabsveg276]

People are already taking the vaccine and most of them are fine and protected. Stop being langaab.