The real native East African

A144ADAE-46C7-4FA2-8A66-A6F4A7F4B569.jpeg
 

Bazed

Tired.
VIP
What do you think about this?

I'm sure only hoteps make this shit and they do that cause they neither have the knowledge or expertise to properly study the subjects of history and archeology. They somehow brought into the white European idea that all of Africa must look the same, that the most genetically diverse place in the world is somehow only able to produce one set of people. They feel the need to claim every aspect of Africa while having no ties to it.

No more is this shown than in ancient Egypt. Both white hoteps and blacks have this unnatural need to justify the existence of their own people in Egypt. Not acknowledging that it was a huge hub of many ethnicities and that modern Egyptians are still more closely related to ancient Egyptians than any of them.
 

Soul Kaizer

โœช๐•ฝ๐–Š๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–’๐–Š๐–‰โœช
IMG_2624.jpeg


We need to start levelling up in the world. Apparently cadaan people have been using psychic energies to repel minorities.

Im going to start using my psychic powers to become supreme emperor of Somalia to fix things.
1702416052037.jpeg
 

NidarNidar

โ™škแนฏr w แธซssโ™š
VIP
No we donโ€™t share any ancestry with Nilotic people. We donโ€™t even look alike.
It's more like we have a common ancestor that split off from each other, modern Nilotes aren't the same as the ones around 6,000 BCE.
 
Our shared Ancestral East African component sure, but idk about Nilotes proper being native to any country but the Sudans
The early Holocene deposits at Lake Besaka and Buur Heybe have provided the earliest evidence in the Horn of intentional human burial....Morphological features of the crania indicate Negroid affinities and can best be compared to the Sudanese skeletons of Jebel Sahaba and Wadi Haifa (McCown n.d.).

For many years the only prehistoric human skeletal evidence from Somalia was the highly fragmentary remains of at least two individuals recovered during World War II by workmen digging a trench at the Rifle Range Site, Buur Hakaba (Clark I954:251). The 1983 and 1985 excavations at Gogoshiis Qabe have now yielded 12 complete human burials from the Holocene deposits, bones of three of which have been ~4C dated to the early Holocene (Brandt in prep.). One individual dating to 6900 + 350 bp (Beta-7474) on the organic fraction and 5210 + 90 bp on apatite (Beta-7473) was buried on his stomach, with at least thirteen comptete sets of lesser kudu horn cores, still attached to the frontiers, placed directly over the body. A man and a woman dating to 5225 _+ 280 bp (UCLA-2705C) on the organic fraction were buried side by side and a pile of stones placed directly over them. Preliminary morphological analysis of these and the other skeletons (L. A. Schepartz pets. comm.; Brand t and Schepartz in prep.) indicates the presence of a regionalIy distinct population at this time, aithough affinities with the late Pleistocene/early Holocene Sudanese and Kenya Rift Valley populations are suggested.



Iโ€™m not necessarily arguing South sudanis are native to Somalia but Nilotic like people probably lived in Somalia and were absorbed by the incoming Cushites, this could explain the SSA shift present in Somalis

@NidarNidar
 

NidarNidar

โ™škแนฏr w แธซssโ™š
VIP
I donโ€™t agree with OP at all but Nilotic like people may have lived in pre-Neolithic Somalia
Not likely, Somalis have a ghost population of hunter-gatherers in our blood that doesn't exist anymore, they've been assimilated, which is why you'll find some Somalis with A OR B haplogroups.
 

NidarNidar

โ™škแนฏr w แธซssโ™š
VIP
Proto Afro Asiatic is most likely from Egypt/Sudan
1702422756480.png


"It is assumed that the proto-Afroasiatic language to have been spoken by pre-Neolithic indigenous African hunter-gatherers, as there is no evidence of words in Proto-Afroasiatic related to agriculture or animal husbandry."

I kinda understand why the Egytians called the land of punt Ta netjer, even within Somali tradition the north has always be revered.

Seems like the red sea hills were very important location, wonder if they done any exacvation in the region.
 

Attachments

  • 1702422698544.png
    1702422698544.png
    118.6 KB · Views: 75
View attachment 307127

"It is assumed that the proto-Afroasiatic language to have been spoken by pre-Neolithic indigenous African hunter-gatherers, as there is no evidence of words in Proto-Afroasiatic related to agriculture or animal husbandry."

I kinda understand why the Egytians called the land of punt Ta netjer, even within Somali tradition the north has always be revered.

Seems like the red sea hills were very important location, wonder if they done any exacvation in the region.
The only evidence for proto Afro asiatic being in the Horn is that the horn has the most Afro asiatic language groups, which is silly because Semitic and Cushitic are both proven to be intrusive.

I agree with those maps, proto AA was definitely in North East Africa but we canโ€™t say for sure it was in the Red Sea hills, it could have been at the Mediterranean coast
 

Soul Kaizer

โœช๐•ฝ๐–Š๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–’๐–Š๐–‰โœช
Pov @Khaemwaset took her advice and stood outside in dijibouuti for 5 minutes and gets hit by instant level 5 heatstroke.
 

Trending

Top