The leading Socialist Mayoral candidate in NYC claimed to be Black on his college application

We were once in jammah outside and these Ismailis look at you like they’ve never seen that before. Even wished us Merry Christmas after 😂
 

Calaami

Garaadka Guud ee Beesha Calaamka
:mjlol: to this day I've never met a real African American who benefitted from Affirmative Action
 
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Shiiit, the brother trynna finnese the game like a brother. A nigga got to do what a nigga got to do. Why you undermine his hustle trying to get 40 hoes and a mule. Trynna expose a man for doing lil righteous on a mayoral lick. He tha true Asiatic Black man fr.
1751662583194.png


Can we please let a nigga shine?
 
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Don't misunderstand, nothing I said was directed at African Americans. I like it when they turn Muslim. I respect them. One can argue that the African American is the ethnic group with the biggest impact on global culture in modern times. Though we have to admit the cadaans are the ones taking that influence and selling it and giving it different faces. Ignorant people try to make them seem lesser by pointing at socio-economic problems but their cultural capital is insane. I mean it's everywhere to the point no one realizes it. And also, American culture is African American culture. An example, the cowboy image that is inextricably associated with John Wayne and Clint Eastwood, they plastered the face of cadaan men, when in reality the cowboy culture came out of African slaves, this later turned different, and even then, 1/4 of cowboys were Black. Cadaans merely joined this trend. Now, if a blockbuster cowboy movie were made, most people would feel an implicit letdown or hesitation, and the dumb racist would be outraged, thinking it is woke. The irony is that the average racist guy loves cowboy imagery and culture.

I believe they all should get 40 acres and a mule in a modern way.

To be honest, I was surprised how an actual Socialist, not a Social Democrat, ended up that high. I am intrigued. I want to see what the guy does. New York is a city that is needlessly run like Gotham, and Mamdani's character came in like a Batman sensational side-character with a good image, trying to clean things up. I'm here for the narrative. Let's see what he does. I think trying something new, even if it is not perfect, is worthwhile for growth. The fact that an admitted Socialist can be the mayor of an American city speaks to the rotten course New York has had. Populism should merely be a tool that can garner organizational capacity, direction, and momentum. However, it should be abandoned quicky as possible when its practical use has reached its move away from a problem. Running on populism is always divisive, very one-track-minded, and ends up in a charged, intensified escalation, causing inflammatory directionality that quickly has to build speed towards volatility.

I believe in the idea that a civilization has to be run by wise people who work beyond the immediate and operate on principle. Not personal or ideological. But on institutional philosophy and virtues for the betterment of humanity and the citizens of said place. Populism respects nothing. It is merely a tool that should never be used to run and operate, and maintain a nation. It can be a tool for immediate inspiration, rejuvenation, and quick battery, but beyond that, it turns into something that eats at good bureaucratic functions (a lot of politicians who want to use the system for themselves demonize the system using populism to maximize power and limit other politicians). At the end of the day, if the ruling class doo not operate on good, commonly agreed upon values, the country will always be torn and the government is going to be a mess. Essentially, you have people with different ideologies who want to go different places.

Ideally, political power should be synonymous with service. Due to Capitalism and really an age-old human corrupt tendency, the political role in the modern Western nation state has become a symbol and aspiration for personal ambition rather than a role for betterment and public good. Languages of values, virtues, and principles in these personal roads become aesthetically deceptive tools to gain personal power, space, and significance. All is for individualistic entrepreneurial advancement.

There is also the fact that, politicians are usually in the rich category, striving for more wealth, and asking for redistributive policies that tax the wealthy more is awkward. People think billionaires from faraway places need to call in to stop anything. No. The average congressman is rich, and is greedy, and does not want to tax themselves higher for the betterment of anyone. People think the political class and the wealthy class somehow are separate and that the billionaires need to be on speed dial every second to keep the politicians in check to represent them. It's not that at all. The politicians are wealthy and will do anything to protect their wealth class because it is them.

I believe the same impulsive factor for the selection of a political mind is associated with financial appetite.

I believe these things have always existed in America, for example. These Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution basically to maximize power to themselves, as elites (by the elites, for the elits) but wrote the consitution because of their elite interests, paranoia of extrenous forces that might limit their elite power, false narcissism of virtue-signaling (those guys were educated fanboys of lofty liberal linguistic and conceptual decorations), and self-awareness (in the sense that they cloaked their projected interest in principled language for all, when it was not, and only made it so elite interests were safe-guarded and and entrecnhed within these so-called checks and balances of the republic) that made them project wheras it was enough for pretty much the common man to think the language was intended to be universal when it was anything but. They were very clever and inadvertently work for the general public, but the system with the entrenched elitism that exists is also was there from the get-go.

To reiterate. If that is the beginning of America, well, there is no wonder things are as they are. However, the languages in a strange way preceded itself from its narrow interests through the liberal broad language for civil interests, irrespective of how the elite functions are protected within the mechanized ruling system.
 

reer

VIP
I believe they all should get 40 acres and a mule in a modern way.
when i read through the internet the consistent dulmi done to them i realized they arent really exaggerating. they were very oppressed. even after segregation dowladda planted drugs in their communities. and school funding is connected to property taxes = lower taxes from their districts = qashin schools = disfunction. they suffer from real systemic racism.
 
when i read through the internet the consistent dulmi done to them i realized they arent really exaggerating. they were very oppressed. even after segregation dowladda planted drugs in their communities. and school funding is connected to property taxes = lower taxes from their districts = crappier schools = disfunction. they suffer from real systemic racism.
It's wild, because slavery in the ancient world was rarely like chattel slavery. They were reduced to worse than animal-like conditions. A Roman slave and a slave in the Islamic world had it much better. There are of course, nuances but bro, those Americans ran slavery based on racism, while slavery everywhere else was mostly about being an indentured servant.

They suffer from systemic problems, indeed. But I would not call it systemic racism because it sounds like people point to the system as the issue itself. The real dark reality and the core of the problem is that the system is filled with cadaans who are actually racist. Americans have a big section who are not only racist but xaasid. Have you ever wondered why they never raid and charge literal members of Ku Klux Klan who have meetings in churches, often spewing ideologies that are genocidal and even entail toppling the current governmental paradigm.

Sure, they don't have the power to make it happen but why don't they get complete restrictions, given the same intolerance and persecution as extremism from takfiri groups that get targeted and restricted in mosques, and even just typical orthodox Islam that have nothing to do with extremism? How is it that Epstein doesn't have a list now, but a guy like Diddy, who was a degenerate sex pest who sometimes beat and threatened people, got targeted with the system's solution to organized crime and drug kingpins when he simply hosted debased parties?

They even threw human trafficking on him for flying consenting sex workers he paid and gave them a luxury plane ride from one state to another for them to do work and get more compensation than they ever had and that is compared to people who ship women that get forcefully turned into prostitution, PDF rings that kidnap children that dissapear to never be seen again by their parents and families, and people that literally get turned into slaves maybe ending up somewhere in Aisa, totally off the grid getting abused and maybe end up facing the worst not long after for the amusement of a devil somwhere.

The reason why that discrepancy exists is because of racist people who run the system, not because the system automatically is against them. Although it has a compounding factor where troubles grow when racists use the system in certain ways and that legacy is still felt today in broad ways.

And by the way, this is not to say African Americans can't do anything even though they are operating on a harder mode; they can and in fact, waiting for white America to grow morality is not the way. They can only fix themselves, truly. Also, African Americans as a group are a very differentiated group that frankly are too disintegrated, where a significant section of their demographic perpetuates the worst thing they learned from the cadaans. To fix up, they need to understand no political group will ever do anything for them, it only makes them part of this never-ending promise cycle. A rejuvenated culture is what can fix things. Something that comes from within that has its mission to recognize and avoid the pitfalls. Had this occurred, a lot of the population would oppose this because many are very ideologically invested in thinking that is counterproductive, although the proponents would claim these thoughts are the next advancement that had its roots in the movements that fought for civil rights. It's partly true and false, but ultimately irrelevant in the current existing nature of such ideology, as it remedies nothing, entrenches the status quo, and reinforces bad moral conditions that split coherency.

It was not uncommon for these cadaans to lynch and hang Blacks, let them hang under a tree after they had castrated them, then the whole family would have a picnic, enjoying life under them. Those people were devils. It's sad that what I wrote is true. What happened to African Americans was arguably one of the worst things that happened to a group of people. Indentured servants in any place would be hard, but it could be as light as a housemaid, a house worker, a warrior, etc., that potentially could gain their freedom in several ways.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top