The Hamas Movement Is The Spiritual Son of The Ayāh tush-Shaytan Khomeini
- Thread starter Omar del Sur
- Start date
Quoting a Madkhali dog like him isn’t really credible here, nobody cares what he thinks. I don’t support Hamas but atleast there’s someone out there fighting in desperate moments. Palestinians are being persecuted and Masjid al-Aqsa is being under attack, instead of focusing on how to help Palestinians, the madkhali dogs want to b1tch and cause division.
Also Hamas aren’t rafidhis, they just have ties to Iran to gain weapons for defence since the Sunni countries are a bunch of coward cucks who don’t want to help them and aren’t really interested, which is a shame.
Also Hamas aren’t rafidhis, they just have ties to Iran to gain weapons for defence since the Sunni countries are a bunch of coward cucks who don’t want to help them and aren’t really interested, which is a shame.
You are a Sufi, you are not against any alleged group called "Madkhalis," you are against Salafis in general. Saying "Madkhalis" just suits your purpose and since there isn't really any difference between "Madkhalis" and Salafis, you can just label any Salafi as a "Madkhali".
Just saying such-and-such is a "Madkhali" is not a proof against what they're saying.
No way am I willing to jump on this thing of being pro Iran... of attacking Sunnis and praising Iran.
Iran is helping "Israel". They are killing Sunnis and destabilizing countries. Then what? This serves "Israel"- instead of focusing on "Israel", Sunnis are faced with Shia militias causing chaos and killing Sunnis. This helps "Israel" by drawing the focus away from Israel. They are in league with the Zionists.
this speaker has spoken against Hamas as well and explained how they are misleading people
ah but- anyone who says anything about Hamas or Muslim Brotherhood is a "Madkhali".
so don't say anything or you are a "Madkhali".
it's literally the exact same logic as the democrats. don't say anything or you are a "white racist Trump supporter".
Madkhalis are not salafis.
there is no real difference. "Madkhali" just means someone who speaks against Muslim Brotherhood, Qutb or Hamas or doesn't support their kind of ideology.
Sheikh Fawzan supports Sheikh Madkhali. There's literally no difference. Sheikh Madkhali is just an ordinary Salafi scholar and the campaign against him is due to him refuting Qutb.
if people haven't seen it already
Madhkalis are fake wadaads that propagate saudi royal family propaganda.They like demonising ahlu dawca its like a cult.
The aki club.
You reverts have problem you know less but try to be judgemental.
Your cult leader Abu Khadijah who has no knowledge is the spirtual leader of North America & Europe and your knowledge is mostly through video link from selected sheikhs in middle East.
You also like to call Ikhwan as free masons.If they were freemasons do you think they would have been deposed by Sisi?
Why would US depose a freemason movement like Ikhwan.Saudis are closer to freemasons than ikhwan because the kingdom was created by United Kingdom and has been protected by US all ever since.They also had an undecover support for Israel.If Saudis were on the manhaj the zionists would fight them tooth and nail.How come they have existed while others in Middle East have been deposed and humiliated?
Last edited:
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
is this why Hamas crackdown on shia groups funded by Iran in Gaza?
TekNiKo
Loyal To The One True Caliph (Hafidahullah)
Atleast Ayatollah is helping his Muslim brothers in Palestinenby providing them with some means of defence. Your cucked Saudi leaders are slaves of Israel and even want the Yahuud to invest in Jaziratul Carab. Hamas shall never give up the muqawammah against the wretchdd Yahuud and their so called "Sunni allies"
I don't represent any government nor am I a follower of any particular government. I am not a fan of the Democrats but that doesn't mean I'm a "white racist Donald Trump supporter".
I don't listen to that guy. I have nothing to do with Abu Khadeejah or SPUBS.
Lying is haraam. I don't listen to Abu Khadeejah and I have nothing to do with Abu Khadeejah or SPUBS.
again I have nothing to do with Abu Khadeejah. I don't listen to Abu Khadeejah, I have nothing to do with Abu Khadeejah or SPUBS.
And again I already refuted this silly claim that Mason-directed groups can't be attacked. It is a historical fact that there have been conflicts where both sides were controlled by the Masons. In fact, I know of multiple instances where Masonic regimes were overthrown. Furthermore, it is perfectly possible that a coup occurs where one Masonic regime overthrows another Masonic regime. Anyone who doesn't know that- it's not my fault they don't know much about how Masonry works.
also I don't really say much against the governments of Somalia, Pakistan, Saudi, Indonesia, Malaysia or most Muslim countries.....
I don't really treat the Saudi government any different than any other of those governments. I don't really attack or defend those governments. I'm not a spokesman for the Saudi government anymore than for the Malaysian government. I like some of the Saudi scholars but that doesn't imply any particular opinion of their government. If you like video games from Japan, that doesn't necessarily imply any particular view on Japan's government. If I drink some tea from Britain, that doesn't mean I'm a spokesman for the British government.
The Saudi scholar I like the best is Sheikh Ibn Baz raheemAllah and he's been dead for decades. It's not like the Saudi government can travel in time and change his fataawa. If some new Saudi scholar goes against what Sheikh Ibn Baz said, probably just go with Sheikh Ibn Baz.
I am a fan of biryani but I am not a representative of the Pakistan government.
I don't really treat the Saudi government any different than any other of those governments. I don't really attack or defend those governments. I'm not a spokesman for the Saudi government anymore than for the Malaysian government. I like some of the Saudi scholars but that doesn't imply any particular opinion of their government. If you like video games from Japan, that doesn't necessarily imply any particular view on Japan's government. If I drink some tea from Britain, that doesn't mean I'm a spokesman for the British government.
The Saudi scholar I like the best is Sheikh Ibn Baz raheemAllah and he's been dead for decades. It's not like the Saudi government can travel in time and change his fataawa. If some new Saudi scholar goes against what Sheikh Ibn Baz said, probably just go with Sheikh Ibn Baz.
I am a fan of biryani but I am not a representative of the Pakistan government.
Is it really Islamic to create those kinds of images?
Even if that channel has a point, it should discuss its points in an intellectual way.
Anyways, talking about "madkhalis" or Saudis if someone discusses Hamas is no different than if I say something about the Democrats and a person starts talking about the Republicans.
I'm not a supporter of the Republicans or the Democrats. And if that channel is really legit, they should not be making those kinds of images and insulting people in that way. It is unIslamic. You can debate things in a respectful way without insulting people.
another thing that that channel brings up is this-
what actual scholars are behind that kind of thing?
I am convinced that we should follow actual scholars and not just random people.
I don't know of any actual scholars (unless we count Yasir Qadhi and Muhammad Hijab) who go around calling people "Madkhalis".
what actual scholars are behind that kind of thing?
I am convinced that we should follow actual scholars and not just random people.
I don't know of any actual scholars (unless we count Yasir Qadhi and Muhammad Hijab) who go around calling people "Madkhalis".
