NSFW The future is now...

[Crow]

Too many beta males these days, Its not just Japanese.
View attachment 50252

We have the same problem in Somalia.

 

[london10]

Fucking paedophiles

 

[Basra]

war caadi ma aha.
The power of technology...

 

[AussieHustler]

Fucking paedophiles

London

Do you know lawyers are already talking about the legal Rights for sex robots and child sex dolls?


ACADEMIC FIGHTS FOR RIGHTS FOR SEX ROBOTS.

Law academic Victoria Brooks says sex dolls may need the legal right to say no:

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/...s/news-story/b297fd1838d4c15f737a6d1a55ccdbcb

Child sex dolls and robots: exploring the legal challenges.

Sex robots appear to be the next big thing for the adult entertainment industry. Unroboticised sex dolls are not new – but combined with state-of-the-art fabrication techniques, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and programming applications, such dolls may soon reach new levels of sophistication.

As sex dolls become increasingly realistic – and their roboticisation looms on the horizon – a key question to ask is how the law should respond when such objects are made for, and used by, those with a sexual interest in children?

Dolls for this market, manufactured overseas, are now starting to appear on the legal radar from attempts to import them into the country. The National Crime Agency (NCA) has warned that child-like sex dolls are being sold on the internet and campaigners have urged the government to outlaw the trade. There have also been calls to ban the import of sex robots designed to look like children.

A legal loophole?

What if the object had crossed the border undetected? The current child protection framework has largely been designed for two-dimensional material – such as photographs and videos. So it would appear that the mere possession of a child sex doll and its robotic counterpart is not currently a criminal offence. The mere fact of possession may not easily be linked to a chain of evidence in relation to the now-established crime of importation. It is feasible that, given the drop in the cost of technology, such as 3D printers, and the emergence of sex-robot programming apps, such items could soon be created domestically, without the need for importation. Currently, the creation of child sex dolls and robots is not a crime.

More on;

http://theconversation.com/child-sex-dolls-and-robots-exploring-the-legal-challenges-81912

 

[london10]

London

Do you know lawyers are already talking about the legal Rights for sex robots and child sex dolls?


ACADEMIC FIGHTS FOR RIGHTS FOR SEX ROBOTS.

Law academic Victoria Brooks says sex dolls may need the legal right to say no:

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/...s/news-story/b297fd1838d4c15f737a6d1a55ccdbcb

Child sex dolls and robots: exploring the legal challenges.

Sex robots appear to be the next big thing for the adult entertainment industry. Unroboticised sex dolls are not new – but combined with state-of-the-art fabrication techniques, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and programming applications, such dolls may soon reach new levels of sophistication.

As sex dolls become increasingly realistic – and their roboticisation looms on the horizon – a key question to ask is how the law should respond when such objects are made for, and used by, those with a sexual interest in children?

Dolls for this market, manufactured overseas, are now starting to appear on the legal radar from attempts to import them into the country. The National Crime Agency (NCA) has warned that child-like sex dolls are being sold on the internet and campaigners have urged the government to outlaw the trade. There have also been calls to ban the import of sex robots designed to look like children.

A legal loophole?

What if the object had crossed the border undetected? The current child protection framework has largely been designed for two-dimensional material – such as photographs and videos. So it would appear that the mere possession of a child sex doll and its robotic counterpart is not currently a criminal offence. The mere fact of possession may not easily be linked to a chain of evidence in relation to the now-established crime of importation. It is feasible that, given the drop in the cost of technology, such as 3D printers, and the emergence of sex-robot programming apps, such items could soon be created domestically, without the need for importation. Currently, the creation of child sex dolls and robots is not a crime.

More on;

http://theconversation.com/child-sex-dolls-and-robots-exploring-the-legal-challenges-81912

Filth. It should get treated just like current child protection laws.

 

[AussieHustler]

Filth. It should get treated just like current child protection laws.

London

I agree, but legislators are way behind new technologies and very slow to react. They've to do a lot of catching up.

 

[london10]

London

I agree, but legislators are way behind new technologies and very slow to react. They've to do a lot of catching up.

They should loose their jobs for being behind on laws that protect children from sex predators.

 

[AussieHustler]

They should loose their jobs for being behind on laws that protect children from sex predators.

London

What do you think of the argument that the female dolls should be given the right to consent?

 

[Jake from State Farm]

Bro this Asian school girl fetish has gone to far.

It’s so fucking weird man. What tf is going on in japan