What do you mean I intentioned it?![]()
I mean, u r very creative, u picked it on purpose lol
What do you mean I intentioned it?![]()
Grazie mille, bella signoraI mean, u r very creative, u picked it on purpose lol
Yep under full protection. Not even the Dajjal can enter it.except Mecca, Holly sacred place for Muslim is in danger. But promised he will protect Kaabah so yeah u kinda right, we should not care
actually.... I don't think this is as big as people think it is. don't get me wrong, this is terrible but there was a local Salafi preacher I heard who talked about Adel al-Kalbani and called him the Yasir Qadhi of Saudi Arabia. so he is known for doing questionable stuff, although I think this is probably some of the worst yet that he's done.
Yeah I mentioned this. I rate him for this. He's like f*ck the house of wahaab im running shit now.Saudia been a shitshow since the clown MSB has come into power. Did you see his recent interview where he says majority of hadiith are invalid?
Saudia been a shitshow since the clown MSB has come into power. Did you see his recent interview where he says majority of hadiith are invalid?
I have zero interest in talking about the governments of Muslim countries. I don't really talk about the governments of those countries in general.
The reality is that the government is the reflection of the people. When the people are corrupt, you see corrupt governments come into power. I think it's a waste of time talking about the rulers. There is corruption with the rulers because there is corruption with the people. If the people are corrupt and you remove the corrupt rulers- what will happen? More corrupt rulers will emerge.
On the Day of Judgement, I doubt I'll be asked about many news articles I read about the rulers of countries. What will matter is things like how much of the Quran I memorized. I'm better off studying the Quran for thirty minutes than watching the news for long periods.
If the people are rectified, the rulers will be better. There is corruption amongst the rulers because there is corruption amongst the people.
If you are in a position to overthrow apostate regimes and implement the sharia, masha'Allah. As for myself, I am just some ordinary person. I have no idea what the kings and princes are up to and I have no control over it. Meanwhile, I can study Arabic, study Quran and talk to my neighbors about Islam. I don't think God is going to ask me about what rulers on the other side of the ocean were up to. It is not my responsibility and I'm more interested in focusing on what is within my control.
Personally, I don't really pay attention to the governments of Saudi, Somalia, Malaysia, etc. My view is pretty much all the governments are run by the same network of Freemasons.
I'm interested in the scholars and Saudi still has some good scholars. The scholar mentioned in OP- like I said, I already heard a local Salafi preachers mention him before and call him the Yasir Qadhi of Saudi Arabia. He was already a questionable type.
Nah he sounds like a Quaranist here, which is too far, Islam is based on Quran AND Sunnah of the Prophet.Yeah I mentioned this. I rate him for this. He's like f*ck the house of wahaab im running shit now.
We won't be questioned about these types, but we should always point out wrongs we see and call it out.
Bilal was arab+Ethiopian not bantuIs this guy one of Bilal descendents or???
Right he’s the first afro arab imam of the holiest mosqueSad it has to be a black man to be off this caliber among Muslims and easily corrupted
What I was taught is- with a Muslim ruler, you should not criticize them; with a kaffir ruler it's okay.
Personally, I would rather err on the side of caution when it comes to takfir.
For myself personally, I think the safer thing is to avoid getting into all that- making takfir on rulers, getting into all that. I personally want to be careful when it comes to all that. So I avoid getting into that kind of thing.
![]()
Hadith on Doubt: Leave your doubts for certainty in truth
www.abuaminaelias.com
Criticism is not equivalent to takfir. Otherwise you would be sheep following whatever is said.
Imam Hanbal was arrested and tortured for refusing to say the Quran was created. The ruler was trying to make him affirm a heresy. Yet Imam Hanbal didn't speak out against the ruler. If staying silent was good enough for Imam Hanbal, I think it's good enough for me. All the focus on talking bad about rulers, to me it reminds me of Che Guevara and Karl Marx. I want to be like Imam Hanbal, I'm not trying to be like Che Guevara.
In that case Hanbal was probably facing death for disobeying his ruler, MBS is not your ruler or mine, nor does he have any power over anyones criticism of him. He is a fake princess of an Arab nation cucked by the West for the last century.
In that case Hanbal was probably facing death for disobeying his ruler, MBS is not your ruler or mine, nor does he have any power over anyones criticism of him. He is a fake princess of an Arab nation cucked by the West for the last century.