You can't have two origins lmaoWe have origins from both regions. Only right we are apart of both.:siilaanyolaugh:
They should take out "Arab" out of Arab League though.
You can't have two origins lmao
We only have one origin & that's in North Africa, since Proto-Cushites/North Africans were the cultural bearers that brought Afro-Asiatic languages and cultures to the HOA. They only happen to have heavily mixed with Sub-Saharan African women when they were travelling South.
sub-Saharan just means below the Zahara desert and nothing more.You do know that sub saharan is a way to demean africans below the Northern region of Africa, right?
If you still ID with such a label, you're a self hater. Sub= below. It has a negative connotation.
At least saying I'm african ain't a problem, but sub saharan African. You seriously need some help!!
Afro-ASIATIC right. As in the Near East.![]()
Afro-Asiatic is a purely linguistic geographical label. The "Afro" part refers to the descendants of Eurasians that live in Africa that speak Hamitic(Ancient Egyptian/Coptic, Cushitic & Berber) languages. Whereas, the "Asiatic" part refers to the West Eurasians that stayed in the Middle-east that speak Semitic languages.Afro-ASIATIC right. As in the Near East.![]()
Afro-Asiatic is a purely linguistic geographical label. The "Afro" part refers to the descendants of Eurasians that live in Africa that speak Hamitic(Cushitic & Berber) languages. Whereas, the "Asiatic" part refers to the West Eurasians that stayed in the Middle-east that speak Semitic languages.
It was previously called Hamito-Semitic.
Language families always have this dual thing (Indo-European, Nilo-Saharan, Sino-Tibetan, Balto-Slavic, Niger-Congo... etc).
Afro-Asiatic used to be called Hamito-Semitic, but that became too politically incorrect (Hamitic hypothesis etc).
I thought it was also called Afro-Asiatic because African hunter gathers left the continent for the Fertile Cresent and became Middle Eastern farmers and subsequently returned to North Africa...?
Sahara desert*sub-Saharan just means below the Zahara desert and nothing more.
Becoming a regional "Superpower" would be an exaggeration, since that would require huge manpower etc.Somalia was known as the bridge for both African Union and Arab league. If Somalia plays a role along with their strategic location. The benefits is indefinite to be adequately described.
Unfortunately, the 68 IQ race has shown 0 capacity to take advantage over its strategic position because they would've been a superpower for both organizations by now.
Becoming a regional "Superpower" would be an exaggeration, since that would require huge manpower etc.
In an alternate reality, Somalia would likely be at a similar level in economic & military development as Oman etc. Whereas, Egypt would obviously become the regional power of MENA & East Africa just like in the current timeline.
Sahara desert*
I know it is, but you surely don't know anything besides that, huh? Its connotation?
We are not close to them economically or culturally!What makes you think that?
Is it because I simply stated the fact that we have closer economic & cultural relations with them?