Still living rent free in these Nilotics heads

Okay so south sudan wasnt developed by the government in Khartoum because south sudan didnt have an empire hundreds of years ago and during colonization britain didnt develop the region. Okay you win
 
Okay so south sudan wasnt developed by the government in Khartoum because south sudan didnt have an empire hundreds of years ago and during colonization britain didnt develop the region. Okay you win
You have to be trolling at this point... I cannot believe that someone can actually be this stupid.

You never asked "Why didn't Khartoum develop South Sudan?" you asked:
why was south sudan not as developed as north sudan?

Don't blame your retardation on others. Go seek medical help please.
 
This is getting boring now. The region wasnt developed post colonization because the colonists didnt develop it themselves and pre colonization the area and the people didnt have an empire. Nothing to do with Khartoum not sharing oil money equally.
 
Last edited:
This is getting boring now. The region wasnt developed post colonization because the colonists didnt develop it themselves and pre colonization the area and the people didnt have an empire. Nothing to do with Khartoum not sharing oil money equally.
This was boring from the start. I am talking to a brick wall.

Not having an empire is just an example of being primitive - and it seems like you agree with me since you insist that it's Khartoum job to develop the South. Meanwhile Khartoum didn't spend oil money on Port Sudan development yet it's equally as developed as Khartoum. Learn how to use your brain.
 

Trending

Top