Centralism
Do we want a highly centralized state? this means mogadishu and officials
control your health, education, infrastructure, security, currency, and every
function of your state. They will be named from Mogadishu and given their policy
from Mogadishu as a national agenda. One ruler controls the nation type of government
Similar to siyad style. Everyone else will all just be officials of the central government.
You will have no power in naming your officials, creating your policy, at best all you
can do is take your orders from the central government and execute. Your state will be controlled from Mogadishu that's if you even allowed a state as centralism can mean many things. They can allow you to have a state but it will be controlled from Mogadishu at all times. They will just be a figurehead and symbolic official there.
Federalism
Central government can only deal with 4 areas such as military, currency, foreign
affairs, and immigration matters. They can set the national agenda on these topics
name it's officials, form it's policy, and also handle it's execution.
Anything outside of those 4 areas such as health, business investments, education,
infrastructure or anything outside of those 4 duties is none of their business.
They can not name any official, not handle any policy, nor interfere in the delivery
of such service. That is a state matter according to our constitution. The people of that state decide on their leader and he controls their government, policy, and delivery functions. They have their own separate criminal/civil courts for their regional areas. Not symbolic government but has power to run his affairs outside of the 4 core areas of the federal government.
The grey areas that need to be agreed on between state and federal authorities.
Taxation, Resource sharing, judicial matters like civil/criminal/constitutional courts
parliament matters state vs federals and which legislation each handles. That's basically
the grey areas they haven't even discussed in the nation and spending all their time
mixing up their roles in central/federalist ideas.
My dad watched this and said they should be having these type of discussions the centralist/federalist if their arguments hold any water not going around implementing something nobody even has agreed on. It's like PL trying to build a government without ISLAN Mahamed who didn't bring the clans together on some little wisdom of 'yaan lays dilin' oo 100 meel loo fasiray hikmadasi such as we are not killing anything worthy enuff to bring peace between us, the one's we kill is reborn tommorow so the status quo remains. It created a ceasefire to build something on top of which is the government puntland has. He said where is the islan mahamed of centralist or federalist, horta wax aan ku heeshino intanan loo gudbin dawlad dhisid.
Do we want a highly centralized state? this means mogadishu and officials
control your health, education, infrastructure, security, currency, and every
function of your state. They will be named from Mogadishu and given their policy
from Mogadishu as a national agenda. One ruler controls the nation type of government
Similar to siyad style. Everyone else will all just be officials of the central government.
You will have no power in naming your officials, creating your policy, at best all you
can do is take your orders from the central government and execute. Your state will be controlled from Mogadishu that's if you even allowed a state as centralism can mean many things. They can allow you to have a state but it will be controlled from Mogadishu at all times. They will just be a figurehead and symbolic official there.
Federalism
Central government can only deal with 4 areas such as military, currency, foreign
affairs, and immigration matters. They can set the national agenda on these topics
name it's officials, form it's policy, and also handle it's execution.
Anything outside of those 4 areas such as health, business investments, education,
infrastructure or anything outside of those 4 duties is none of their business.
They can not name any official, not handle any policy, nor interfere in the delivery
of such service. That is a state matter according to our constitution. The people of that state decide on their leader and he controls their government, policy, and delivery functions. They have their own separate criminal/civil courts for their regional areas. Not symbolic government but has power to run his affairs outside of the 4 core areas of the federal government.
The grey areas that need to be agreed on between state and federal authorities.
Taxation, Resource sharing, judicial matters like civil/criminal/constitutional courts
parliament matters state vs federals and which legislation each handles. That's basically
the grey areas they haven't even discussed in the nation and spending all their time
mixing up their roles in central/federalist ideas.
My dad watched this and said they should be having these type of discussions the centralist/federalist if their arguments hold any water not going around implementing something nobody even has agreed on. It's like PL trying to build a government without ISLAN Mahamed who didn't bring the clans together on some little wisdom of 'yaan lays dilin' oo 100 meel loo fasiray hikmadasi such as we are not killing anything worthy enuff to bring peace between us, the one's we kill is reborn tommorow so the status quo remains. It created a ceasefire to build something on top of which is the government puntland has. He said where is the islan mahamed of centralist or federalist, horta wax aan ku heeshino intanan loo gudbin dawlad dhisid.