Somali woman killed in East London

Khal Mah Oma

Drink shaah
I’ve read the post four guys got arrested on a suspicion to the incident. Not sure if they’re related to the situation but they’ve got arrested.

The situation is bizarre. Zahwa Salah (the lady that got killed) was working on a care home. Doing the right thing in her life by helping people yet got killed. I hope there’s justice for her.
 

Basra

LOVE is a product of Doqoniimo mixed with lust
Let Them Eat Cake
VIP
Sad Baby GIF
 
I think I'm aware of that I'm just highlighting the family shouldn't have posted her pics to the media.
Releasing the victims picture and putting face to a name usually brings sympathy amongst the populace and can even help in the deceased finding full justice. That’s more important than not showing the picture so a few low life racists can not make snarky comments in my opinion.
 
Releasing the victims picture and putting face to a name usually brings sympathy amongst the populace and can even help in the deceased finding full justice. That’s more important than not showing the picture so a few low life racists can not make snarky comments in my opinion.
They’re trying to stir up hate against a grieving family 🤮
 
They’re trying to stir up hate against a grieving family 🤮
It’s twitter so unfortunately it is expected. That app has really became something else after Elon bought it. I saw the case on bbc which showed her face obviously doing its purpose there.

AUN to her and may Allah grant sabr and imaan to her family.
 
The Garac Tommy Robinson posted a tweet insinuating it was an honour killing.

AUN,
It's now illegal according to the online safety act.

The false communications offence contained in section 179 replaces the offence previously found in s127(2)(a) and (b) of the Communications Act 2003.[32][33] (The existing s127(1) offence remains in force.)[34] To be prosecuted under section 179, a defendant must be shown to have known the information they transmitted to be false, and that they had an intention to cause non-trivial psychological or physical harm to those receiving the message.

Blaming the family with no proof is wrong and actionable.
 
It's now illegal according to the online safety act.

The false communications offence contained in section 179 replaces the offence previously found in s127(2)(a) and (b) of the Communications Act 2003.[32][33] (The existing s127(1) offence remains in force.)[34] To be prosecuted under section 179, a defendant must be shown to have known the information they transmitted to be false, and that they had an intention to cause non-trivial psychological or physical harm to those receiving the message.

Blaming the family with no proof is wrong and actionable.
The c*nt has good Jewish lawyers. He put it as a question mark so nothing will come from it legally. Plus, Elon promotes him.
 

Trending

Top