Is that the first thing that came up in your mind? Wth is wrong with you pple and the somalis in Scandinavia are fulxumo tooIs that what you call your balls now?
Is that the first thing that came up in your mind? Wth is wrong with you pple and the somalis in Scandinavia are fulxumo tooIs that what you call your balls now?
Closely monitor Somalis with a sujood mark on their forehead![]()
Doqon.
Also a criminal record kkkkkkkkSometimes it is a burn-mark you have look for after a failed experiment
But really though, you can make an educated guess: Young 18-30, male, lower to middle class and engages in religious activity but even that doesn't scale it down![]()
Also a criminal record kkkkkkkk
Sometimes it is a burn-mark you have look for after a failed experiment
But really though, you can make an educated guess: Young 18-30, male, lower to middle class and engages in religious activity but even that doesn't scale it down![]()
Not always but most of the time, but sometimes it is petty crimes and other times it is organized criminality.
@AussieHustler can you tell us the clans of this guy and killer mom.
That's a hoyo making a hussel
Not a freaking terrorist
And no, I meant Somali women and girls. We are carrying this race forward and with pride![]()
It's not surefire, but he's not that far off. I know ppl who intentionally select for hard surfaces and grate their foreheads on the ground to achieve that mark bc it's considered the look of a highly religious individual. They usually hold extremist views.Most of them are mental. No sane person blows themselves up, or goes around killing people. This simulcanster peep is another doqon suggesting the sujuud mark as a sign of terrorism when plenty of older Muslims have it from years of prostrating on a hard surface.
DaroodAutism, he has autism bro.What is hisYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
What is hisYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
That's not true at all! I don't know where this 'no sane person...' argument comes from, but almost always they are not 'insane' or 'mental' in the clinical sense of the words. Most murders, massacres/genocides in history were committed by people who as far as we know were sane. In fact, the vast majority of murders anywhere are committed by people who would clinically be considered 'neurotypical'. They are just cunts.Most of them are mental. No sane person blows themselves up, or goes around killing people. This simulcanster peep is another doqon suggesting the sujuud mark as a sign of terrorism when plenty of older Muslims have it from years of prostrating on a hard surface.
It's basically a version of the 'no true scotsman' fallacy.Everyone wants to avoid the elephant in the room: Islamic dogma. All Jihadis base their actions on Islamic dogma, so to say they're "insane" won't cut it anymore.
Time for Muslims to repudiate dangerous Islamic dogma that primes impressionable minds to commit horrible crimes.
It's basically a version of the the 'no true scotsman' fallacy.
They are not sane - no sane person would do this.
They are not Muslim - no real Muslim would do this.
Etc...
Indeed, which is why I don't subscribe to theoretical Islam. No one cares about true blue Islam. Islam is what Muslims do. If Muslims act violent, then Islam is a violent religion.