Show us your previous/current grades?

[Farjano-Walad]

We will get you a VIP and your degree on your name soon and unlike @Abdallas one it won’t be done as a joke.

interesting, i will wait and judge yall by action,

 

[Farjano-Walad]

I agreed with what you said mostly, but then you freaking lost me when you said you listen to Peter Schiff.

That guy is a broken record. Only predicting doom. Not a true economist.

get out of here ugaas, peter schiff and his father Irwin schiff have taught me more about economics in their books than 3 years of Keynesian economic degree,

the man was predicting in 2005/6/7 and 2008 how shyt would hit the fan, about sub prime and lehman brothers and other banks that went down,

no one knows the timing but he got the sequence and the a-priories right abut how the Federal reserve was screwing up the monetary policy which would have bad consequences for the US and globe,

tell me what he got wrong?

how an economy grows and why it doesn't, 1985 is one of top 100, only out done by henry hazlitt's economics in one lesson 1946 edition still top 100, war only the bible has sold more than they have

if you wish to debate about him i am happy, bring it on, i was paying for this guys weekdays radio show back in 2011 10$ a month and the amount of knowledge i got is immeasurable,

he made me understand inflation, my professors used to say inflation is good and Stalin was an economic genius when the man murdered millions

 

[Muji]

ahahahhaha, well tell him i am married to a queen,

yes finsihed, i got the scholarship when i was 26, i did my masters late but was finally pushed by family to finish it,

this is nothing, my cousin whose father is a Top ONLF finished his PhD aged 29, 1 year before me, he is one of the worlds experts in producing medical kits for people with kidney issues, you know that device that helps them urinate on a that special pouch whislt they wait for their kidney surgery, and family makes us compete and always teases us on how we finished before me, though he is one year older,

there were 8 somalis in my first year economics and 300 people, all somalis either drop it or got kicked out by second year and the 300 people reduced to around 70 by third year, its tough, its boring but i like it,

when they asked for a 3,000 word assignment, i would do 6,000 words, and they would excuse me for it and not penalised because they knew i was very thorough and would pit one author against another and then disagree with both whilst also agreeing with both alter one, this is called critical thinking and the like this kind of stuff,

the entire class would debate with me, just me and the professor would be on their side, one time i made this italian socialist cry and the professor said to me privately " try you know your stuff, just take it easy on them and do not make them cry, be easy on them"

this is because i am obsessed, i follow the 10,000 hours rule,

You seem very passionate your topic and so you should be. When you’re good at something you want to do it even more, that’s the path I want to go on..

I’ve already started collecting reading for my dissertation, it’s easier when you break things into smaller tasks. I’m also adding critical thinking to every paragraph I write in my reports. They love breadth of reading and I will give them that too.

 

[Farjano-Walad]

You seem very passionate your topic and so you should be. When you’re good at something you want to do it even more, that’s the path I want to go on..

I’ve already started collecting reading for my dissertation, it’s easier when you break things into smaller tasks. I’m also adding critical thinking to every paragraph I write in my reports. They love breadth of reading and I will give them that too.

let me give you the best book ever written on how to focus, execute a plan/project and break things into smaller chunks so you can "chew what you bite"

the 4 disciplines of execution

one of the author is the son of Stephen covey, the author of the 7 habits of highly successful people,

if you do not wish to buy it check out the videos on you tube,


get the audio book for 30 day free trial on audible and then cancel, in case you do not wish to spend, its only around 7 bucks or pounds if your UK, if you have amazon prime,

i used to work for amazon as a manager, here is a tip, get student prime for 30 days trial, get audible -amazon owns them, cancel both before the 30 days and you will not be charged, both waa trial, if you do not have prime no worries, get the audible trial and cancel, book is around 8 hours, listen to it instead of music,

 

[Farjano-Walad]

You seem very passionate your topic and so you should be. When you’re good at something you want to do it even more, that’s the path I want to go on..

I’ve already started collecting reading for my dissertation, it’s easier when you break things into smaller tasks. I’m also adding critical thinking to every paragraph I write in my reports. They love breadth of reading and I will give them that too.

i follow the 10,000 hours rule, this is why i can talk about almost any topic in my field and write about it, its passion, mum and dad said do medicine, i hated blood, i was reading econ books since i was 14, dad studying economics for his masters helped, mum is a science teacher and wanted me to do medicine, do not do something your parents want you to do, do what you want, you will regret it otherwise

 

[Abdalla]

You seem very passionate your topic and so you should be. When you’re good at something you want to do it even more, that’s the path I want to go on..

I’ve already started collecting reading for my dissertation, it’s easier when you break things into smaller tasks. I’m also adding critical thinking to every paragraph I write in my reports. They love breadth of reading and I will give them that too.

I can see you've never written. Dont add critical thinking on every fucking paragraph, you dummy. Bundle them all into one paragraph, safe it for the last, in the discussion part.

War waxaan maxay aheed

 

[Muji]

I can see you've never written. Dont add critical thinking on every fucking paragraph, you dummy. Bundle them all into one paragraph, safe it for the last, in the discussion part.

War waxaan maxay aheed

Lol

The don’t like that in the UK. Amateur mistake! I did that in my first exam in my degree and the lady said you need to be critical throughout the whole essay and not just at the end.

The conclusion should be a summary, the strong points, the limitations, and any future work you think is needed.

 

[Abdalla]

Lol

The don’t like that in the UK. Amateur mistake! I did that in my first exam in my degree and the lady said you need to be critical throughout the whole essay and not just at the end.

The conclusion should be a summary, the strong points, the limitations, and any future work you think is needed.

Discussion is much broader than your conclusion. Your intro should be really broad wherein you define the added value of your research and the gap in knowledge. Followed by a a narrow and specific method and results section. Your discussion should be broad again.

A paper should have an hourglass design. Broad, specific and then broad

 

[Farjano-Walad]

Lol

The don’t like that in the UK. Amateur mistake! I did that in my first exam in my degree and the lady said you need to be critical throughout the whole essay and not just at the end.

The conclusion should be a summary, the strong points, the limitations, and any future work you think is needed.

i dont know where abdalla is from, Sweden? USA?

but you do need to have critical analysis and evaluation on every paragraph/cited authors work and thus page, heck you even need to critic your own opinion, find a source that disagrees with you/agrees with you,

if you leave the critical analysis part for the end/summary/conclusion you are wasting grades, it needs to be through out the entire body,

here is how it should work:

cite a source/ critique/evaluated, find another source that agrees or disagrees with that source, add your own flavour/opinion -they will want to hear your end of the story/ your thoughts- you are paying for uni after all and they want to see you voice your own opinion and have a backbone to disagree and agree, critically analysing sources and even analysing your side of the story

example: i think xxxxx x xx x x x xxx, however, (Wiliams et al 2004) disagrees because of xxx xx xx x x xxx x x x, but (Johns 2007) agrees with my view point /agrees with my evaluation because of xxxx xx x x x xx xx

give your die of the story, agree/disagree/ pit authors/sources against each other,

as a simple rule every page should have at least 2 sources and thus 2 critiques/evaluation, ideally 3 but it should be 3 as you will add your own opinion/evaluation

this is if the font size is an average 12 times New roman and thus about 250-300 words a page- but this depends on what font size you are forced to use by the faculty/lecturer as sometimes they use to demand a particular font size to make it universal when you upload it on the electronic board online for marking

lastly make sure to use words like: in my evaluation, in my analysis of author XX, in my critique of author so and so, these words will convey you are good at analysing and evaluation and critiquing,

karbash authors, pit one author against another,

last last, get sources from the professor if they wrote a book/article, this is called ass kissing tactic and flatters them wildly, thus cite them in your work, do not disagree, agree with them no matter what, do not over do it, just cite them in the first one or two pages and the summary/conclusion, it shows you took the time to read their work,

and did that so many times my old Jewish american professor called me after uni to proof read his book and give it a final opinion before he published it, a really nice guy,

 

[Prince Abubu]

Spoiler: My former grades of two masters

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

I got triggered when @Knowles called me stupid for no fucking reason. I am not the type to brag but I did two STEM masters simultaneously. I am presenting the results of the research based courses I followed.

The post that triggered me.



Show us your transcript of record Miss Holes. Please.

I can't see anything. What did you study?

 

[Apollo]

I can't see anything. What did you study?

It was removed for privacy reasons. He had good grades in some health field dhouble Masters.

 

[Abdalla]

I can't see anything. What did you study?

I showed my transcript of two masters. Had a 9 for advanced statistics, and 8's for couple or researched based modules.

It was deletes because @Knowles threatened to doxx me

Wallahi abdalla you should have quit while you were ahead

This thread will hunt you

 

[Muji]

I showed my transcript of two masters. Had a 9 for advanced statistics, and 8's for couple or researched based modules.

It was deletes because @Knowles threatened to doxx me

Lol are you a set up chick now?

i dont know where abdalla is from, Sweden? USA?

but you do need to have critical analysis and evaluation on every paragraph/cited authors work and thus page, heck you even need to critic your own opinion, find a source that disagrees with you/agrees with you,

if you leave the critical analysis part for the end/summary/conclusion you are wasting grades, it needs to be through out the entire body,

here is how it should work:

cite a source/ critique/evaluated, find another source that agrees or disagrees with that source, add your own flavour/opinion -they will want to hear your end of the story/ your thoughts- you are paying for uni after all and they want to see you voice your own opinion and have a backbone to disagree and agree, critically analysing sources and even analysing your side of the story

example: i think xxxxx x xx x x x xxx, however, (Wiliams et al 2004) disagrees because of xxx xx xx x x xxx x x x, but (Johns 2007) agrees with my view point /agrees with my evaluation because of xxxx xx x x x xx xx

give your die of the story, agree/disagree/ pit authors/sources against each other,

as a simple rule every page should have at least 2 sources and thus 2 critiques/evaluation, ideally 3 but it should be 3 as you will add your own opinion/evaluation

this is if the font size is an average 12 times New roman and thus about 250-300 words a page- but this depends on what font size you are forced to use by the faculty/lecturer as sometimes they use to demand a particular font size to make it universal when you upload it on the electronic board online for marking

lastly make sure to use words like: in my evaluation, in my analysis of author XX, in my critique of author so and so, these words will convey you are good at analysing and evaluation and critiquing,

karbash authors, pit one author against another,

last last, get sources from the professor if they wrote a book/article, this is called ass kissing tactic and flatters them wildly, thus cite them in your work, do not disagree, agree with them no matter what, do not over do it, just cite them in the first one or two pages and the summary/conclusion, it shows you took the time to read their work,

and did that so many times my old Jewish american professor called me after uni to proof read his book and give it a final opinion before he published it, a really nice guy,

This is exactly what I’m going to do. This is making abdallas blood boil that you are giving better advice than he is in his own thread.

I remember my tutor showing us how he wrote a literature review and he literally said cite your professor, it goes a long way.

@Abdalla walal swallow your pride and listen to what teeri is telling you if you ever want a PHD, after all he is a real dr you are a dr in the same way as dr dre is.

 

[4head]

I'm still a student in History, 2nd year and I'm passing my 3rd year. Hopefully, I still have a month before my exams.
Later on, I want to become a famous writer.

 

[Shaolin23]

I'm still a student in History, 2nd year and I'm passing my 3rd year. Hopefully, I still have a month before my exams.
Later on, I want to become a famous writer.

Isn’t history a garbage degree what can you do with a history degree

 

[4head]

Isn’t history a garbage degree what can you do with a history degree

Garbage? How?
With that, i can be : - a journalist,
- a politician,
- a writer,
- a teacher in a HighSchool or at Uni,

and the list goes on.

Life doesn't turn around STEM degrees and computer science, my dude.

 

[TheAnswer]

Isn’t history a garbage degree what can you do with a history degree

Ask Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo, Federal President of Somalia