Jokes on you cause I’m not a Salafi. Some Salafis would consider me an innovator for being an Ash’ari but that’s not relevant to what we’re discussing here.Khaawarij Salafis want to keep the Muslim ummah in perpetual darkness.
Jokes on you cause I’m not a Salafi. Some Salafis would consider me an innovator for being an Ash’ari but that’s not relevant to what we’re discussing here.Khaawarij Salafis want to keep the Muslim ummah in perpetual darkness.
Woman are not Low-IQ but let’t not be ridiculous here, woman are generally more impressionable then men and are physically weaker than men on average, that’s just reality. If I had a 16 year old son for example, I would be less concerned with him staying outside in the dark at midnight then I would do with my 16 year old daughter since men are physically stronger on average and they’re less likely to be harassed compared to women and they can handle tough environments better than woman.Because they operate on an incredibly dehumanizing paradigm of women being low-IQ and easily led to shed their morality.
Note, in their supremest world view, men don’t commit Zina, don’t get caught up in different theories and are all above that.
It’s all a farce, Daniel was supposedly celebrating when he heard that not only are women being denied education but also some shops were stopping women from even getting sim-cards. That is the world view Daniel has. You’re not allowed any form of agency, even having your own phone is too much fitnah.
They use the fitnah argument to make the lives of women unbearable. First it’s why do you women need education, then it’s why do women need phones it’s fitnah! It causes women to engage with non Mahrams!
The lengths that some of these guys will go to is scary and I’m ashamed of you @Abu Ash’ari. Wallahi if us people don’t stand up to these weird fringe types they will try and make women a slave class without any form of education and asset. It is only by the will of Allah that inheritance is clearly written in the Quran but if they could take that, they would because the idea is to keep you 100% reliant. That is the intention here. Make no mistake as this brother noticed:
Thank you, this is what i’m trying to say. I want woman to learn in a healthy environment. A lot of people are ignoring the fact that atheism and feminism is prevalent and dominant in Western universities.Al
Although students are more likely to adopt atheism and feminism in western universities, higher education for women in Muslim countries is actually a good thing. Thank God many girls attend universities back home. They can prioritize motherhood and boost your child's academic potential.
Show me your evidence. Being weaker in body has nothing to do with intellect or being overall impressionable. Also, impressionable how so? We know that men struggle more with viewing corn and that supposedly women are a fitnah for men and that men feel more desire and temptations. That is according to you brothers. The goal is forever shifting right?Woman are not Low-IQ but let’t not be ridiculous here, woman are generally more impressionable then men and are physically weaker than men on average, that’s just reality.
What does that have to do with education? Stick to the topic. We’re not talking about the physical body here. Stop conflating the two, a woman getting beat up at university? What does that have to do with anything?If I had a 16 year old son for example, I would be less concerned with him staying outside in the dark at 12:00 midnight then I would do with my 16 year old daughter since men are physically stronger on average and they’re less likely to be harassed compared to women and they can handle tough environments better than woman.
Western education system can also impact men. Hence if you care about the imaan of men which is even more important than provision, you should tell them to stop going uni. Trade is better.Now i’m aware of the weirdos online who want to completely ban woman’s education and are celebrating it which I don’t agree with but there’s some partial truth to their argument which cannot be overlooked which is the extent of Fitnah that goes on in the Western education system which is not negligible and it’s extremely dangerous.
It’s very telling that you can’t logically combat my argument because you know it’s ridiculous. So ridiculous, you need to come with silly examples about physicality when we’re talking about education and the mind.Also the video I linked isn’t Daniel explaining his thoughts, it’s his wife speaking about her experience at Harvard and she articulated her argument well. You should watch it.
Jokes on you cause I’m not a Salafi. Some Salafis would consider me an innovator for being an Ash’ari but that’s not relevant to what we’re discussing here.
Atheism also impacts Muslim men. Do you believe that more Muslim women fall into Kufr and Zina? Answer that question. But funny isn’t it that we doubt the mental fortitudes of women, when they convert to Islam more than men.Thank you, this is what i’m trying to say. I want woman to learn in a healthy environment. A lot of people are ignoring the fact that atheism and feminism is prevalent and dominant in Western universities.
Ya Jāhil! Do you know the meaning of Khawārij and what's meant to be a Khāriji?I couldn't care less, all those weird names just reek of khaawarij.
Ya Jāhil! Do you know the meaning of Khawārij and what's meant to be a Khāriji?
It was pretty common when I was in university ngli am in my 3rd year of university rn, and not once did i encounter this "heresy, atheism, feminism, drugs and zina" you speak of.
That is the crux of the issue and all of these charlatan’s are trying to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes, well maybe accept that Haqoqat guy who is pretty open about it. Women’s intellectual and financial potential needs to be clipped and punished as some men simply can’t compete in this ever changing world, hence limiting the growth of women is easier rather than actually attempting to be better men.My conclusion is yes because it'll help build a smarter society and future for a group of people. If 50% of a population doesn't have to worry about higher education and as a result stay in a position to not be what they can potentially be, this leaves less pressure on men for mating.
Yep, to counteract that they want all women to be a class below men, hence what will happen in their ideal world is that even the most average of men will have slightly more education and obviously financial resources above the vast majority of women.This results in more average people. Here in Canada, most people would be turned off by a guy with no higher education because it'll signal that they may not be as intelligent as them.
what DOESN'T make you happy?yes, in our community the sisters outnumber us in higher education and professional careers. it makes me so happy![]()
I watched this video made by Umm Khalid (Daniel Haqiqatjou’s wife) and I think she made a good case why woman should not generally pursue higher education but they should prioritize motherhood and family instead. Even though I don’t agree with the Taliban’s (alleged) decision to ban higher education for woman, I don’t think higher education is necessary for most woman since woman are not obligated to be providers, they could just get married to a financially stable man who would look after and take care of them. Also I think as Muslims living in the West, if we choose to remain in the West then we should ban our daughters from attending universities/colleges. Anyone who isn’t living under a rock would know that Western Universities/colleges are breeding grounds for Atheism, marxism, feminism, heresy, hookup culture and all Anti-Islamic ideas. We shouldn’t expose our daughters to such an environment.