Sheikh Boris Johnson

Basra

LOVE is a product of Doqoniimo mixed with lust
Let Them Eat Cake
VIP
Yeah Boris looks British, but Sarkozy looks odd & doesn't look French. His Jewish ancestry has really expressed itself:
330px-Flickr_-_europeanpeoplesparty_-_EPP_Summit_October_2010_%28105%29.jpg


Sarkozy looks more Middle-Eastern/Jewish than European.


He is also very good in the bedroom. He is the type who will slap u good, u wont even protest.
 
green eyed blonde asians @Jimmer what do u make of this
Original Turks from north eastern China (Manchuria) along with the Mongols and Koreans. Portion of them moved into Mongolia to become nomads, and some of them assimilated with Han Chinese.

Once they passed the altai mountains into central asia they mixed with Indo-Europeans (white people). Uzbek, Uighurs, Tatars, Krygyz, Kazakhs, Turkmens are mixed to varying degree with white people.

Tbf intermingling has been happening for a long time. The ruling dynasty of the Gokturks were Saka (Iranian) in origin.
 

Molotoff

Supreme Bosniak Geeljire
VIP
:sass2:
You have a typical European misguided point of view about the Turkic peoples. The true Turks from Central Asia apparently share the same origin with many European people which means the ancestors of today's Europeans have migrated to Europe from Asia. And there are natural blond, red hair, blue and green eye Asian Turks. You are cousins.

Watch Spencer Wells' documentary on human migration for a change.

For example, R1a is one of the major Y-chromosome haplogroups present in Europe:

View attachment 135061

Absolutely all Asian Turkic people have sizeable R1a haplogroup in their blood with ethnic Kyrgyz people having the highest percentage of it: - 63%. That's actually the third highest percentage among the European people, more than Poles.

View attachment 135065



Here are Bosniaks with R1a at 17%. Also pay attention to the presence of R1b, N, J1, J2 and G haplogroups among both Bosniaks and Kyrgyz. Dude, your people genetically related to Kyrgyz in Asia as much as Turks to Kyrgyz.

View attachment 135066


Here are Y-chromosome data for the Turks in Turkey:

View attachment 135067





But how do they have I2a though? And how much?
 

AbdiGeedi

To keep your balance, you must keep moving.
Original Turks from north eastern China (Manchuria) along with the Mongols and Koreans. Portion of them moved into Mongolia to become nomads, and some of them assimilated with Han Chinese.

Once they passed the altai mountains into central asia they mixed with Indo-Europeans (white people). Uzbek, Uighurs, Tatars, Krygyz, Kazakhs, Turkmens are mixed to varying degree with white people.

Tbf intermingling has been happening for a long time. The ruling dynasty of the Gokturks were Saka (Iranian) in origin.
The original ancient Turks come from three groups: Kyrgyz, Turks, Uigurs. No other Turkic ethnic groups existed back then except for the above three. They originate from the area what is today called Mongolia and the bordering regions of Russia. All three were also formed from one of these ancient people Saka/Scythians and Tocharians. So, from the onset the Turkic people were of mixed origin. In case of Kyrgyz, their founding fathers were likely Saka/Scythians due to the very high percentage of R1a haplogroup among them. We are talking 3rd century BC and earlier here.

Mongols came to picture much much later.

It is wrong to say the ancient Turks moved to Mongolia. There was no Mongolia back then. That territory is their birthplace and their "parents" were from the Indo-European stock at the time of formation. So, there was no such thing as "mixed to varying degree with white people".

Todays' Europeans, Eastern Iranians and Turkic people are of the same descent to a large extent.
 

AbdiGeedi

To keep your balance, you must keep moving.
But how do they have I2a though? And how much?
The same ancient people that contributed genetically to today's European people were also forefather's of original Turks. Read my post above and watch the Spencer Wells video I posted earlier on human migration.

How much? Each Turkic ethnic group took in different degrees of "European" and "Asian" genetic material. They vary wildly among the Turkic people.

Some have distinctly "European" founding fathers and "Asian" founding mothers. Others have the opposite.

These are Uyghur Turkic girls from China:

uyghur-ladies.jpg


 
Last edited:
The original ancient Turks come from three groups: Kyrgyz, Turks, Uigurs. No other Turkic ethnic groups existed back then except for the above three. They originate from the area what is today called Mongolia and the bordering regions of Russia. All three were also formed from one of these ancient people Saka/Scythians and Tocharians. So, from the onset the Turkic people were of mixed origin. In case of Kyrgyz, their founding fathers were likely Saka/Scythians due to the very high percentage of R1a haplogroup among them. We are talking 3rd century BC and earlier here.

Mongols came to picture much much later.

It is wrong to say the ancient Turks moved to Mongolia. There was no Mongolia back then. That territory is their birthplace and their "parents" were from the Indo-European stock at the time of formation. So, there was no such thing as "mixed to varying degree with white people".

Todays' Europeans, Eastern Iranians and Turkic people are of the same descent to a large extent.
Proto-Turks existed long before intermingling with indo-Europeans. They were entirely mongoloid, original Turks didn't have indo-European in them. The Hongshan culture in Manchuria were Turks (5000 BC; long before 3rd century BC and long before Caucasians arrived east from pontic-caspian steppe), they don't originate in Mongolia. However once they moved into Mongolia and moved west they mixed with Indo-Europeans. Present day groups that identify as Turks are mixed with assimilated people (not original mongoloid Turks from North east China).
 
Last edited:

Trending

Latest posts

Top