Saudi woman given 34-year prison sentence for using Twitter

Saudi woman given 34-year prison sentence for using Twitter


Salma al-Shehab, a Leeds University student, was charged with following and retweeting dissidents and activists

Salma al-Shehab

Salma al-Shehab, 34, was accused of ‘assisting those who seek to cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security by following their Twitter accounts’. Photograph: democracy now


Tue 16 Aug 2022 22.24 BST



A Saudi student at Leeds University who had returned home to the kingdom for a holiday has been sentenced to 34 years in prison for having a Twitter account and for following and retweeting dissidents and activists.
The sentencing by Saudi’s special terrorist court was handed down weeks after the US president Joe Biden’s visit to Saudi Arabia, which human rights activists had warned could embolden the kingdom to escalate its crackdown on dissidents and other pro-democracy activists.

The case also marks the latest example of how the crown prince Mohammed bin Salman has targeted Twitter users in his campaign of repression, while simultaneously controlling a major indirect stake in the US social media company through Saudi’s sovereign wealth fund, the Public Investment Fund (PIF).
Salma al-Shehab, 34, a mother of two young children, was initially sentenced to serve three years in prison for the “crime” of using an internet website to “cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security”. But an appeals court on Monday handed down the new sentence – 34 years in prison followed by a 34-year travel ban – after a public prosecutor asked the court to consider other alleged crimes.
According to a translation of the court records, which were seen by the Guardian, the new charges include the allegation that Shehab was “assisting those who seek to cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security by following their Twitter accounts” and by re-tweeting their tweets. It is believed that Shehab may still be able to seek a new appeal in the case.
Salma al-Shehab and her family.

Salma al-Shehab and her family. Photograph: ESOHR

By all accounts, Shehab was not a leading or especially vocal Saudi activist, either inside the kingdom or in the UK. She described herself on Instagram – where she had 159 followers – as a dental hygienist, medical educator, PhD student at Leeds University and lecturer at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, and as a wife and a mother to her sons, Noah and Adam.
Her Twitter profile showed she had 2,597 followers. Among tweets about Covid burnout and pictures of her young children, Shehab sometimes retweeted tweets by Saudi dissidents living in exile, which called for the release of political prisoners in the kingdom. She seemed to support the case of Loujain al-Hathloul, a prominent Saudi feminist activist who was previously imprisoned, is alleged to have been tortured for supporting driving rights for women, and is now living under a travel ban.

One person who knew Shehab said she could not stomach injustice. She was described as well-educated and an avid reader who had arrived in the UK in 2018 or 2019 to pursue her PhD at Leeds. She had returned home to Saudi Arabia in December 2020 on a holiday and had intended to bring her two children and husband back to the UK with her. She was then called in for questioning by Saudi authorities and eventually arrested and tried for her tweets.

A person who followed her case said Shehab had at times been held in solitary confinement and had sought during her trial to privately tell the judge something about how she had been handled, which she did not want to state in front of her father. She was not permitted to communicate the message to the judge, the person said. The appeals verdict was signed by three judges but the signatures were illegible.

Twitter declined to comment on the case and did not respond to specific questions about what – if any – influence Saudi Arabia has over the company. Twitter previously did not respond to questions by the Guardian about why a senior aide to Prince Mohammed, Bader al-Asaker, has been allowed to keep a verified Twitter account with more than 2 million followers, despite US government allegations that he orchestrated an illegal infiltration of the company which led anonymous Twitter users to be identified and jailed by the Saudi government. One former Twitter employee has been convicted by a US court in connection to the case.

One of Twitter’s biggest investors is the Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who owns more than 5% of Twitter through his investment company, Kingdom Holdings. While Prince Alwaleed still serves as chairman of the company, his control over the group faced questions in the US media, including the Wall Street Journal, after it emerged that the Saudi royal – a cousin of the crown prince – had been held captive at the Ritz Carlton in Riyadh for 83 days. The incident was part of a broader purge led by Prince Mohammed against other members of the royal family and businessmen, and involved allegations of torture, coercion and expropriation of billions in assets into Saudi coffers.

In a 2018 Bloomberg interview of Prince Alwaleed, which was conducted in Riyadh seven weeks after his release, the billionaire acknowledged he had reached a “confirmed understanding” with the Saudi government, apparently in connection to his release, which was confidential.

More recently, Kingdom Holding announced in May that it had sold about 17% of its company to the PIF, where Prince Mohammed serves as chairman, for $1.5bn. That, in turn, makes the Saudi government a significant indirect investor in Twitter. According to Twitter, investors do not play a role in managing the company’s day-to-day business.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights condemned Shehab’s sentence, which it said was the longest prison sentence to ever be brought against any activist. It noted that many female activists have been subjected to unfair trials that have led to arbitrary sentences and have been subjected to “severe torture”, including sexual harassment.

Khalid Aljabri, a Saudi who is living in exile and whose sister and brother are being held in the kingdom, said the Shehab case proved Saudi Arabia’s view that dissent equates to terrorism.

“Salma’s draconian sentencing in a terrorism court over peaceful tweets is the latest manifestation of MBS’s ruthless repression machine,” he said, referring to the crown prince. “Just like [journalist Jamal] Khashoggi’s assassination, her sentencing is intended to send shock waves inside and outside the kingdom – dare to criticise MBS and you will end up dismembered or in Saudi dungeons.”

While the case has not received widespread attention, the Washington Post on Tuesday published a scathing editorial about Saudi Arabia’s treatment of the Leeds student and said her case showed that “commitments” the president had received on reforms were “a farce”.

“At the very least, Mr. Biden must now speak out forcefully and demand that Ms. Shehab be released and allowed to return to her sons, 4 and 6 years old, in the United Kingdom, and to resume her studies there,” it read.

Read full article
 
The world twiddled their thumbs when these savages killed a journalist on foreign soil. Cash is king and aint nobody fuckin up the bread for this miskeen women and her fucked up situation.
 

hinters

E pluribus unum
VIP
They’re very strict with parts of the deen that involve women but lax on other parts.
 
I

Saudi woman given 34-year prison sentence for using Twitter


Salma al-Shehab, a Leeds University student, was charged with following and retweeting dissidents and activists

Salma al-Shehab

Salma al-Shehab, 34, was accused of ‘assisting those who seek to cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security by following their Twitter accounts’. Photograph: democracy now


Tue 16 Aug 2022 22.24 BST



A Saudi student at Leeds University who had returned home to the kingdom for a holiday has been sentenced to 34 years in prison for having a Twitter account and for following and retweeting dissidents and activists.
The sentencing by Saudi’s special terrorist court was handed down weeks after the US president Joe Biden’s visit to Saudi Arabia, which human rights activists had warned could embolden the kingdom to escalate its crackdown on dissidents and other pro-democracy activists.

The case also marks the latest example of how the crown prince Mohammed bin Salman has targeted Twitter users in his campaign of repression, while simultaneously controlling a major indirect stake in the US social media company through Saudi’s sovereign wealth fund, the Public Investment Fund (PIF).
Salma al-Shehab, 34, a mother of two young children, was initially sentenced to serve three years in prison for the “crime” of using an internet website to “cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security”. But an appeals court on Monday handed down the new sentence – 34 years in prison followed by a 34-year travel ban – after a public prosecutor asked the court to consider other alleged crimes.
According to a translation of the court records, which were seen by the Guardian, the new charges include the allegation that Shehab was “assisting those who seek to cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security by following their Twitter accounts” and by re-tweeting their tweets. It is believed that Shehab may still be able to seek a new appeal in the case.
Salma al-Shehab and her family.

Salma al-Shehab and her family. Photograph: ESOHR

By all accounts, Shehab was not a leading or especially vocal Saudi activist, either inside the kingdom or in the UK. She described herself on Instagram – where she had 159 followers – as a dental hygienist, medical educator, PhD student at Leeds University and lecturer at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, and as a wife and a mother to her sons, Noah and Adam.
Her Twitter profile showed she had 2,597 followers. Among tweets about Covid burnout and pictures of her young children, Shehab sometimes retweeted tweets by Saudi dissidents living in exile, which called for the release of political prisoners in the kingdom. She seemed to support the case of Loujain al-Hathloul, a prominent Saudi feminist activist who was previously imprisoned, is alleged to have been tortured for supporting driving rights for women, and is now living under a travel ban.

One person who knew Shehab said she could not stomach injustice. She was described as well-educated and an avid reader who had arrived in the UK in 2018 or 2019 to pursue her PhD at Leeds. She had returned home to Saudi Arabia in December 2020 on a holiday and had intended to bring her two children and husband back to the UK with her. She was then called in for questioning by Saudi authorities and eventually arrested and tried for her tweets.

A person who followed her case said Shehab had at times been held in solitary confinement and had sought during her trial to privately tell the judge something about how she had been handled, which she did not want to state in front of her father. She was not permitted to communicate the message to the judge, the person said. The appeals verdict was signed by three judges but the signatures were illegible.

Twitter declined to comment on the case and did not respond to specific questions about what – if any – influence Saudi Arabia has over the company. Twitter previously did not respond to questions by the Guardian about why a senior aide to Prince Mohammed, Bader al-Asaker, has been allowed to keep a verified Twitter account with more than 2 million followers, despite US government allegations that he orchestrated an illegal infiltration of the company which led anonymous Twitter users to be identified and jailed by the Saudi government. One former Twitter employee has been convicted by a US court in connection to the case.

One of Twitter’s biggest investors is the Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who owns more than 5% of Twitter through his investment company, Kingdom Holdings. While Prince Alwaleed still serves as chairman of the company, his control over the group faced questions in the US media, including the Wall Street Journal, after it emerged that the Saudi royal – a cousin of the crown prince – had been held captive at the Ritz Carlton in Riyadh for 83 days. The incident was part of a broader purge led by Prince Mohammed against other members of the royal family and businessmen, and involved allegations of torture, coercion and expropriation of billions in assets into Saudi coffers.

In a 2018 Bloomberg interview of Prince Alwaleed, which was conducted in Riyadh seven weeks after his release, the billionaire acknowledged he had reached a “confirmed understanding” with the Saudi government, apparently in connection to his release, which was confidential.

More recently, Kingdom Holding announced in May that it had sold about 17% of its company to the PIF, where Prince Mohammed serves as chairman, for $1.5bn. That, in turn, makes the Saudi government a significant indirect investor in Twitter. According to Twitter, investors do not play a role in managing the company’s day-to-day business.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights condemned Shehab’s sentence, which it said was the longest prison sentence to ever be brought against any activist. It noted that many female activists have been subjected to unfair trials that have led to arbitrary sentences and have been subjected to “severe torture”, including sexual harassment.

Khalid Aljabri, a Saudi who is living in exile and whose sister and brother are being held in the kingdom, said the Shehab case proved Saudi Arabia’s view that dissent equates to terrorism.

“Salma’s draconian sentencing in a terrorism court over peaceful tweets is the latest manifestation of MBS’s ruthless repression machine,” he said, referring to the crown prince. “Just like [journalist Jamal] Khashoggi’s assassination, her sentencing is intended to send shock waves inside and outside the kingdom – dare to criticise MBS and you will end up dismembered or in Saudi dungeons.”

While the case has not received widespread attention, the Washington Post on Tuesday published a scathing editorial about Saudi Arabia’s treatment of the Leeds student and said her case showed that “commitments” the president had received on reforms were “a farce”.

“At the very least, Mr. Biden must now speak out forcefully and demand that Ms. Shehab be released and allowed to return to her sons, 4 and 6 years old, in the United Kingdom, and to resume her studies there,” it read.

Read full article
I don't understand what did she actually do?
 

Aurelian

Forza Somalia!
VIP
The westerners hyped over MBS allowing women to drive while ignoring him prisoning women rights activists who fought decades for women to drive. This is what is wrong with the west
 

TekNiKo

“I am an empathic and emotionally-aware person.
VIP
The world twiddled their thumbs when these savages killed a journalist on foreign soil. Cash is king and aint nobody fuckin up the bread for this miskeen women and her fucked up situation.
34 yeara for using twitter, MBS is so two faced he claims to modernize KSA than does this
 
The world twiddled their thumbs when these savages killed a journalist on foreign soil. Cash is king and aint nobody fuckin up the bread for this miskeen women and her fucked up situation.
Let them kill each other bro.. you is turned into an ayrab wannabe and sh1t?? Dhegacas killing each other is none of our business.. yo'd let 'em sand niggas wipe themselves out of the face of earthhh...
 
Yes I know, they take it way too far. Women using twitter isn’t haram.

you think she was arrested for using twitter?

first they come with this manipulative headline that she was arrested for using twitter. ok but that is just propaganda spin. she wasn't arrested for using twitter. she was arrested for whatever it was she was pushing on twitter. it's like some of those "scholars". I don't know the details of every single case but Tarifi- I'm not calling him Sheikh- I think he clearly deserved. Same with Salman Al-Awdah. the media reports it as though they just got arrested for no reason. but I've seen info on them that the media doesn't report and frankly I think they deserved it. even Munajjid of islamqa.info. if what I've seen is true- they caught him supporting the Houthis- shia terrorists! now only were/are they shia terrorists but they are terrorists who attack Saudi.

people have to quit getting pulled into this anti-Saudi stuff. I'm not talking to the person I'm quoting, I'm talking to the people in general.

Mexico is one of the top places in the world for killing of journalists. dozens of journalists can get killed in Mexico and the common people in the West have no clue about it. but this one Khashoggi dies and the media is screaming about it from the rooftops. how does one dead Saudi journalist matter more than dozens of dead Mexican journalists? edit: apparently since 2000 it's something like more than a hundred dead journalists

furthermore- looking at it from here in the US- Saudi is way far away all the way across the ocean and then across a whole continent called Africa. meanwhile Mexico is right next door. so why rile the people about one dead Saudi journalist versus all the dead Mexican journalists?

you are a sucker if you don't realize there is an agenda behind it. there is a whole coalition of groups that want people to froth at the mouth about Saudi:

-Shia
-Sufis
-Liberals
-Feminists
-Homos/Degenerates

these are the hands you are playing into when you play into this agenda. it isn't about Saudi. Saudi, whatever its flaws, was a country built on Salafiyyah. it is deeply tied to Salafiyyah. you can fit homo imams within a Sufi framework. there is no way you can fit homo imams within a Salafi framework. it's about homo imams, it's about turning your daughter into a s***, it's about the mass tide of degeneracy that they want to engulf the earth with and that Salafiyyah is a barrier to. don't be a sucker.
 

GuanYu

Custom title
Let them kill each other bro.. you is turned into an ayrab wannabe and sh1t?? Dhegacas killing each other is none of our business.. yo'd let 'em sand niggas wipe themselves out of the face of earthhh...
Ikr, If they Can't help their palestinian brothers, Why the f*ck us Somalis should care about them? Ciidooda ha cunaan, saliida ha ka dhergaan :pachah1:
 
you think she was arrested for using twitter?

first they come with this manipulative headline that she was arrested for using twitter. ok but that is just propaganda spin. she wasn't arrested for using twitter. she was arrested for whatever it was she was pushing on twitter. it's like some of those "scholars". I don't know the details of every single case but Tarifi- I'm not calling him Sheikh- I think he clearly deserved. Same with Salman Al-Awdah. the media reports it as though they just got arrested for no reason. but I've seen info on them that the media doesn't report and frankly I think they deserved it. even Munajjid of islamqa.info. if what I've seen is true- they caught him supporting the Houthis- shia terrorists! now only were/are they shia terrorists but they are terrorists who attack Saudi.

people have to quit getting pulled into this anti-Saudi stuff. I'm not talking to the person I'm quoting, I'm talking to the people in general.

Mexico is one of the top places in the world for killing of journalists. dozens of journalists can get killed in Mexico and the common people in the West have no clue about it. but this one Khashoggi dies and the media is screaming about it from the rooftops. how does one dead Saudi journalist matter more than dozens of dead Mexican journalists? edit: apparently since 2000 it's something like more than a hundred dead journalists

furthermore- looking at it from here in the US- Saudi is way far away all the way across the ocean and then across a whole continent called Africa. meanwhile Mexico is right next door. so why rile the people about one dead Saudi journalist versus all the dead Mexican journalists?

you are a sucker if you don't realize there is an agenda behind it. there is a whole coalition of groups that want people to froth at the mouth about Saudi:

-Shia
-Sufis
-Liberals
-Feminists
-Homos/Degenerates

these are the hands you are playing into when you play into this agenda. it isn't about Saudi. Saudi, whatever its flaws, was a country built on Salafiyyah. it is deeply tied to Salafiyyah. you can fit homo imams within a Sufi framework. there is no way you can fit homo imams within a Salafi framework. it's about homo imams, it's about turning your daughter into a s***, it's about the mass tide of degeneracy that they want to engulf the earth with and that Salafiyyah is a barrier to. don't be a sucker.

what
Let’s be real the gulf countries and the west are allies . They collectively hate Iran more
 
what
Let’s be real the gulf countries and the west are allies . They collectively hate Iran more

Yes, that is the narrative that is pushed but I don't believe it. And I mean this supposed conflict between Iran and the West.

Iran is promoted as this ultimate enemy of the West. Well why did Bush invade Iraq and Afghanistan and not Iran? Everyone knows at this point the WMDs thing was fake. It is a joke to think Saddam was really some threat to the West. And no one who isn't clueless or a sucker really believes the official version of 9/11. The reality is the Taliban were not this inherently anti-US movement. They just wanted sharia in their country.

Saddam and the Taliban were not these big threats to the West. But Iran is supposed this ultimate enemy of the West.

So why not just invade Iran? Instead of invading Iraq and Afghanistan, why not just invade Iran?

Frankly I don't believe Iran and the West are really enemies. I think the supposed conflict between them is fake.

The masses basically are idiots. They believe whatever the TV/mainstream media tells them. I'm talking about these people:

mqdefault.jpg


now- these people HATE Saudi and they hate the Taliban. yet if you mention Iran they'll just sort of scratch their head. there is no zero proof I'm aware of that Saudi actually promotes terrorism like people claim all the time. yet Iran openly backs all sorts of terrorist groups. and these current-thing-supporting masses... they believe whatever the tv/mass media tell them to believe and there is basically no difference between the tv/mass media and the government.

I mean look at Russia and look at the Taliban. someone at the top gives the order, this order trickles down to the tv/mass media and suddenly the masses are frothing at the mouth against Russia/Taliban/whatever. if the Western elites were really serious about fighting Iran, their cattle would be frothing at the mouth about Iran. you mention Saudi or the Taliban they're enraged but you mention Iran and they're just sort of puzzled.

I actively go out of my way to find anti-Iran content and I can hardly find anything in English. we should be getting flooded with anti-Iran content if the Iran versus West thing was real. the masses should be frothing at the mouth against Iran and being mentally groomed for a war against them.

also it makes zero sense for them to have invaded Iraq if Iran was really their enemy. Saddam was anti-Iran to the point that he fought a war with them for like ten years. and we already know that Saddam wasn't really threatening the West. it makes no sense if we go with the official narrative.

so the Iran honestly is fake.

as for the Saudi government- it isn't that I support or don't support the Saudi government. but it's that I support what Saudi was built on. and we can say that Saudi historically has a partnership with a West. that is true. but not everybody who works with the West is necessarily their puppet or really has the same interests. look at the Afghan mujahideen for example. yesterday the West was funding them, next the West is at war with them.

anyways, like I say, all this anti-Saudi stuff is really about trying to go after Salafiyyah. I think the Saudis were very clever people

ehgdvo4xsaaeibe-jpg.140131


it's like this meme describes. the Saudi leadership at some managed to get an alliance with the West without Westernizing. they definitely have/have-had some sort of partnership but there's no way the West actually likes Salafiyyah or really likes Saudi. mention Saudi to some random Westerner and watch how they froth at the mouth.

how come Saudi in the Western media constantly is "SAUDI BAD"..... I can't point to one single instance where Saudi is depicted positively in Western media. somehow they came with some sort of understanding but there is inherent tension at least in terms of Western ideology versus Salafiyyah. I've actually seen were Sheikh Fawzan endorsed the killing of US soldiers in Iraq. sometimes you have people who actually hate each other but work together for some sort of mutual interests- but they aren't real friends. I think it's possible the West genuinely has friendship with Saudi elites but they definitely hate Saudi overall as a society.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top