Saudi cleric: ‘It is prohibited to protest in Islam’

A prominent Saudi cleric, Shaikh Assim Al-Hakeem, has come under fire on Twitter over his response to a question posed to him by a user regarding the permissibility of protesting in Islam, specifically in light of the on-going demonstrations in the US over the murder of an unarmed black suspect by Minneapolis police officers.

The Jeddah-based cleric, who is a well-known propagator in the English language and who regularly appears on Saudi-owned religious satellite channel Huda TV, which is aimed at English speakers told his 161,500 followers that “It is not permissible to protest in Islam”.

An unavailable tweet said: "If u see his location you would know the reason why he said that. Just say It is not permissible to protest in Saudi Arabia not Islam"

Al-Hakeem came under criticism by many Muslim users, with many citing Quranic principles of standing up against injustice, even were it to be from one’s own family. Other’s highlighted widely known prophetic narrations, such as: “Whosoever of you sees an evil action, let him change it with his hand; and if he is not able to do so, then with his tongue; and if he is not able to do so, then with his heart—and that is the weakest of faith”.

Another unavailable tweet said: "That's how the ullamah keeps the oppressive regimes in power!!! Let him provide evidence from the Qur'an and Hadiths"

One user asked how it was then possible for Arabia to revolt against the Ottoman caliphate. However, there were also users who shared Al-Hakeem’s interpretation.

Such ideas appears to be in line with the pro-authoritarian Madkhali brand of Salafism, named after the Saudi theologian Rabi Al-Madkhali, who teaches an ultra-conservative practise of Islam, fully endorsed by the Saudi state. It is particularly popular in eastern Libya where it was tolerated under late-ruler Muammar Gaddafi, today its adherents form many of the Libyan National Army (LNA) under General Khalifa Haftar.
 

Djokovic

Somali Arab
If you are protesting does that mean you are doing takfir on the the person you are against i think it is only allowed if it is clear cut kufr. What is your opinion on this matter ?
 

AishaBarri

It’s not that serious
Why lie in the name of Islam? It’s a way to ensure Saudi citizens never even think to protest or go against their leaders
 
It’s funny how fast people resort to the deen when black issues come up. Where was this energy when people were protesting for Palestine? The Arab Spring? Libya when they overthrew Gaddafi?
 
Why lie in the name of Islam? It’s a way to ensure Saudi citizens never even think to protest or go against their leaders
Yeah, it's a cult where they want total and unquestionable obedience to oppressive rulers. This corrupt teaching (Madkhali) has been favoured by the Saudi's and other leaders in the Arab world.
 

AishaBarri

It’s not that serious
Yeah, it's a cult where they want total and unquestionable obedience to oppressive rulers. This corrupt teaching (Madkhali) has been favoured by the Saudi's and other leaders in the Arab world.
I just learnt about Madkhali. Doesn’t sound Islamic to me
 

Djokovic

Somali Arab
It’s funny how fast people resort to the deen when black issues come up. Where was this energy when people were protesting for Palestine? The Arab Spring? Libya when they overthrew Gaddafi?
What has this got to do with black issues this is an understanding he has about all protests
 
Last edited:

Djokovic

Somali Arab
Yeah, it's a cult where they want total and unquestionable obedience to oppressive rulers. This corrupt teaching (Madkhali) has been favoured by the Saudi's and other leaders in the Arab world.

They are a cult there is no doubt about that
 
@Ayubi do you believe that protesting and overthrowing a government is permissible ??
Depends on certain situations and how bad it is although I would strongly not recommend it, most nations have gone to shit because of "Freedom against dictators" (Somalia, Libya, Iraq and Yemen). Also we live in a globalist world where the elites are plotting.
 
This scholar definitely has a gun to his head.
He might hate the royal family, but knows he’ll be locked up or killed if he says otherwise. Though, my question would be, why don’t they leave?

Seems like a difficult choice scholars have to make here. I don’t envy their position.
 
This scholar definitely has a gun to his head.
He might hate the royal family, but knows he’ll be locked up or killed if he says otherwise. Though, my question would be, why don’t they leave?

Seems like a difficult choice scholar have to make here.
They can’t say anything about the family. They actually have to praise them.
 

Trending

Top