I was browsing around trying to look for some information on Mota-Hunter Gatherers and noticed an interesting and what appeared to be a thoroughly put-together article on the "Land of punt" website modeling the genome of Afro-Asiatic Horners with proxies that were more accurate.
Here's the link: https://landofpunt.wordpress.com/2022/11/
Anyways, I skimmed through it all for a bit and was quite impressed by the depth put into the article and the author seemed to be quite knowledgeable in a lot of areas he was discussing as well as a rich reference to sources. So I jumped ahead to the conclusion to see what the main findings were and came to the realisation that the author also had some very odd observations and statements which didn't sit right with what most of my Genetic research regarding this topic has suggested. But then again I didn't want to be an ignorant bastard and assume I must be right simply based on my own assertions that the research I made was the undeniable truth. So here I am on here to see what anyone else has to say about this, in case I may have either read and interpreted this wrong or the author of the article doesn't have a clue what they're talking about. For some, this might be quite hilariously stupid which is what I thought too but the author of the article came off as quite well-spoken and I'm just here to double-check that my confusion isn't for nothing.
Here's the link: https://landofpunt.wordpress.com/2022/11/
Anyways, I skimmed through it all for a bit and was quite impressed by the depth put into the article and the author seemed to be quite knowledgeable in a lot of areas he was discussing as well as a rich reference to sources. So I jumped ahead to the conclusion to see what the main findings were and came to the realisation that the author also had some very odd observations and statements which didn't sit right with what most of my Genetic research regarding this topic has suggested. But then again I didn't want to be an ignorant bastard and assume I must be right simply based on my own assertions that the research I made was the undeniable truth. So here I am on here to see what anyone else has to say about this, in case I may have either read and interpreted this wrong or the author of the article doesn't have a clue what they're talking about. For some, this might be quite hilariously stupid which is what I thought too but the author of the article came off as quite well-spoken and I'm just here to double-check that my confusion isn't for nothing.