Rabbi Does Damage Control Before Mohammed Hijab Debate Hosted By Piers Morgan Is Even Released

[Keep it a boqol]

 

[Basra]

 

[The alchemist]

"My daughter's kosher sex store."

 

[HabarSteven12]

The debate actually happened today and it will be released tomorrow. It's too early to come to a conclusion about who won the debate. I pray Mohamed hijab focused on intellectually dismantling his opponent's points in a dignified and professional manner. It's not befitting of an academic scholar to resort to ad-hominem and personal attacks during a debate.

Mohamed Hijab tends to get extremely aggressive during his debates. Let's pray Mohamed hijab demonstrated professionalism and intellectual maturity during his debate with the rabbi. Remember your opponent loves to see you lose your cool in a debate. I hope Mohamed hijab didn't fall for his trap.

 

[Basra]

The debate actually happened today and it will be released tomorrow. It's too early to come to a conclusion about who won the debate. I pray Mohamed hijab focused on intellectually dismantling his opponent's points in a dignified and professional manner. It's not befitting of an academic scholar to resort to ad-hominem and personal attacks during a debate.

Mohamed Hijab tends to get extremely aggressive during his debates. Let's pray Mohamed hijab demonstrated professionalism and intellectual maturity during his debate with the rabbi. Remember your opponent loves to see you lose your cool in a debate. I hope Mohamed hijab didn't fall for his trap.

Hi Aisha

 

[HabarSteven12]

"My daughter's kosher sex store."

It's irrelevant and had nothing to do with Palestine or the debate. How does bringing that up advance the Palestinian cause or intellectually dismantle any of the rabbi's arguments? I don't mind if Mohamed hijab mentioned that in a different setting. That is very immature. It actually makes the rabbi look professional and gives him points.

 

[The alchemist]

The debate actually happened today and it will be released tomorrow. It's too early to come to a conclusion about who won the debate. I pray Mohamed hijab focused on intellectually dismantling his opponent's points in a dignified and professional manner. It's not befitting of an academic scholar to resort to ad-hominem and personal attacks during a debate.

Mohamed Hijab tends to get extremely aggressive during his debates. Let's pray Mohamed hijab demonstrated professionalism and intellectual maturity during his debate with the rabbi. Remember your opponent loves to see you lose your cool in a debate. I hope Mohamed hijab didn't fall for his trap.

There is only a question of to what degree effective Mohammed's Hijab was. The other side is the wrong side, regardless of how effective they are -- they can never win. Losers get the momentary upper hand all the time. Remember, their ways are never sustainable. For example, if a human turns into evil ways, is Shaytan a winner in that regard? No. He is still a loser.

You might say, ah, I meant effective. But you cannot take out the moral positions of the debate, that has to be factored in, and then the weight is impartial to the good over the bad, regardless.

 

[Soul Kaizer]

"My daughter's kosher sex store."

I had to pause and replay that because i was like wtf!!

 

[The alchemist]

It's irrelevant and had nothing to do with Palestine or the debate. How does bringing that up advance the Palestinian cause or intellectually dismantle any of the rabbi's arguments? I don't mind if Mohamed hijab mentioned that in a different setting. That is very immature. It actually makes the rabbi look professional and gives him points.

It was fucking random and hilarious. No one here knows the context of why that was brought up. Maybe the guy started attacking Mohammed on a personal level which led to a tit-for-tat. If he did, then that was a strong card.

Does it have anything to do with Palestine? No. No one said that. Don't quote me on the obvious.

 

[The alchemist]

I had to pause and replay that because i was like wtf!!

The "kosher" in front is a major cope. What a clown.

 

[HabarSteven12]

There is only a question of to what degree effective Mohammed's Hijab was. The other side is the wrong side, regardless of how effective they are -- they can never win. Losers get the momentary upper hand all the time. Remember, their ways are never sustainable. For example, if a human turns into evil ways, is Shaytan a winner in that regard? No. He is still a loser.

You might say, ah, I meant effective. But you cannot take out the moral positions of the debate, that has to be factored in, and then the weight is impartial to the good over the bad, regardless.

I am not denying any of your points, but how do personal insults and ad-hominem advance your arguments? A man who supports an apartheid settler state built on the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians can never morally win a debate. Personal insults don't advance your arguments and actually give leverage to your opponent.
If you resort to personal insults during a debate, you are demonstrating emotional subjective reasoning.

There are many non-Muslims watching the debate and they genuinely want to see a comprehensive and thorough analysis of the Israeli and Palestinian conflict. Do you really think they will be convinced by Mohamed hijab's personal insults?

To easily humiliate your opponent, you demonstrate intellectual maturity and objective reasoning based on factual information and logical analysis. Mohamed Hijab is a great debater, mashallah, but he needs to be more careful.

 

[Macawisley]

"My daughter's kosher sex store."

I didn’t know yahuuds were freaky like that damn

They really down bad

 

[Fobnimo Till I Dhimo]

This Rabbi is a professional troll propagandistlook how fast he he accused Cenk of being an antisemite.

 

[Keep it a boqol]

This Rabbi is a professional troll propagandistlook how fast he he accused Cenk of being an antisemite.

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[Fobnimo Till I Dhimo]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

I hope MH puts him in his place,he has not met his match yet.

 

[Basra]

Omg! The Rabbi walaahi oo bilaahi oo tolahii made great points. (if it is true, i did not watch the debate)

Rabbi accuses Hijabi of not being a 'real' man because he was ALL ad hominem attacks- just like i always said arab boys are- mama's boys with big fuuto thanks to mamas home cooked bariis!

 

[Hodan from HR]

I am not denying any of your points, but how do personal insults and ad-hominem advance your arguments? A man who supports an apartheid settler state built on the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians can never morally win a debate. Personal insults don't advance your arguments and actually give leverage to your opponent.
If you resort to personal insults during a debate, you are demonstrating emotional subjective reasoning.

There are many non-Muslims watching the debate and they genuinely want to see a comprehensive and thorough analysis of the Israeli and Palestinian conflict. Do you really think they will be convinced by Mohamed hijab's personal insults?

I still get major cringe the way he talked to Ayan Hirsi on JP channel. He said Magan means refugee in somali. Like was that suppose to be an insult to all somalis? He also brought up her affair with her current husband when it had nothing to do with the question asked. This man keeps portraying muslims in an ugly way in big platforms with millions of subscribers instead of using it as an opportunity to do dawah, by being on his best akhlaq. Doesn't he know his conduct might put others off Islam?

I am not even a fan of Ayan Hirsi and I left feeling bad for her in that debate. The comments were full of people siding with her although she did not make any good points.

To easily humiliate your opponent, you demonstrate intellectual maturity and objective reasoning based on factual information and logical analysis. Mohamed Hijab is a great debater, mashallah, but he needs to be more careful.

I agree. The discussion of Hamza Yusuf with JP was like this, very enlightening. Alot of people in the comments were saying it sparked their interest in Islam and will be doing further research..

 

[Hodan from HR]

@HabarSteven12

Do you think they keep inviting Hijab to these platforms because he fits their narrative of muslims being uncouth and aggressive in nature?

 

[Garaad Awal]

@HabarSteven12

Do you think they keep inviting Hijab to these platforms because he fits their narrative of muslims being uncouth and aggressive in nature?

MH > Madkhalis Salafis like Shamsi

 

[Hodan from HR]

MH > Madkhalis Salafis like Shamsi

Pardon my ignorance.I don't know this Shamsi guy..

Mr.Hijab should identify as an influencer who happens to be a Muslim. He is a good entertainer for sure, but his behavior is not that of a da'ee


https://understandquran.com/dhikr-secret-task-transformer/