This is serious discussion now no more jokes and kaftan and tell me if it can work for us or not. It's following the scientific model, in this instance I will use not logic but or numbers but comparative evidence because you seem to like 'comparing' or 'seeing' other states do something maybe it's due to 'trade history' of the red sea as we all waited for the 'empires' of our day to come sailing by and give us 'knowledge' we never imagined or were prepared to create a knowledge civilization ourselves because the empires wouldn't do that for us or else they lose their empire status and you won't need them anymore like the Arabs and Europeans now.
We been surviving with this desert mentality of survival and being 'armed' all our lives and I seem to think we take this idea as the only way to survive in the world. It has been proven I think the first to go in survival is the 'warriors' or cultures that support 'geesinimo'. European dark ages lost so many tribes never to be see again, same with the arab dark ages, I am sure you will find the same pattern with any culture that is about 'strong man' principles. Why? your bringing 'attraction' to yourself to be targeted and u will always remain in a constant cycle of suspicion, deception, snitching, joining armed groups, cutting deals for military investments, etc. Why? the culture is about this, your people want to feel safe and they feel like they never dreamed a world can exist in 'amaan lagu siiyo' due to the old world where there was no united nation or league of nations, world institutions, we never had a world order sxb ever this large and I think this is new to us like the 1960 govt was new to us and trust me we don't want to lose the world order or we go back to the same old world u remember.
The old world had 'spheres' or 'axis' based on empires territories and lane ways, we had multiple orders and small kingdoms. Somalia was on the 'omani trade route' which used to manage this side of Africa. PL took advantage to update itself and keep up with the world thanks to Oman. But we fail to update ourselves in this new world order.
Anyways have we been to all the nations in the world who are 'neutral' like say the 'warsangeli kingdom' is very neutral and they have survived and their most peaceful area in PL. But at the same time it hasn't gained much either by being neutral so is there a negative effect to remaining neutral. I know the best and longests way to survive is the jewish method, just leave power alone, live as 'shacab' and focus on knowledge building and not be worried about state matters.
They do sneakily get involved politically, marry powerful leading families, have a strong influence in academias, even political idealogy(capitalism, socialism is from them), Ribah economy is from them. They established a world where they removed themselves from power and focused on inventions and knowledge to determine how the world economies, militaries, power will operate. It worked brilliantly wallahi and there is proof to this they survived 3000 years living as civilians. The negative is only they are prone to 'attack' and suffered a lot of losses through out history marki sheekadooda la arkay and till this day people are highly suspicious of them like we are of HG in Somalia
We been surviving with this desert mentality of survival and being 'armed' all our lives and I seem to think we take this idea as the only way to survive in the world. It has been proven I think the first to go in survival is the 'warriors' or cultures that support 'geesinimo'. European dark ages lost so many tribes never to be see again, same with the arab dark ages, I am sure you will find the same pattern with any culture that is about 'strong man' principles. Why? your bringing 'attraction' to yourself to be targeted and u will always remain in a constant cycle of suspicion, deception, snitching, joining armed groups, cutting deals for military investments, etc. Why? the culture is about this, your people want to feel safe and they feel like they never dreamed a world can exist in 'amaan lagu siiyo' due to the old world where there was no united nation or league of nations, world institutions, we never had a world order sxb ever this large and I think this is new to us like the 1960 govt was new to us and trust me we don't want to lose the world order or we go back to the same old world u remember.
The old world had 'spheres' or 'axis' based on empires territories and lane ways, we had multiple orders and small kingdoms. Somalia was on the 'omani trade route' which used to manage this side of Africa. PL took advantage to update itself and keep up with the world thanks to Oman. But we fail to update ourselves in this new world order.
Anyways have we been to all the nations in the world who are 'neutral' like say the 'warsangeli kingdom' is very neutral and they have survived and their most peaceful area in PL. But at the same time it hasn't gained much either by being neutral so is there a negative effect to remaining neutral. I know the best and longests way to survive is the jewish method, just leave power alone, live as 'shacab' and focus on knowledge building and not be worried about state matters.
They do sneakily get involved politically, marry powerful leading families, have a strong influence in academias, even political idealogy(capitalism, socialism is from them), Ribah economy is from them. They established a world where they removed themselves from power and focused on inventions and knowledge to determine how the world economies, militaries, power will operate. It worked brilliantly wallahi and there is proof to this they survived 3000 years living as civilians. The negative is only they are prone to 'attack' and suffered a lot of losses through out history marki sheekadooda la arkay and till this day people are highly suspicious of them like we are of HG in Somalia