I only seek Puntites or jubaland residents opinions on this topic as we don't have a conflict of interest in this 'debacle' and will discuss the federal realities facing Mogadishu.
Should Mogadishu be represented in parliament and senate or should it be excluded?
The Pro Banadir arguments for states and district rights is.
1. They pay taxes
2. They have a 2 million population
The arguments against Banadir representation.
1. It's the capital and belong to all Somalis and therefore cannot take on a 'political, tribal, state' character
The current structure of the SFG is 'tribal 4.5 lower house' and 'regional state chamber'. If Hags want mogadishu to enjoy lower house representation, it will only come out of they're 4.5 portion not other clans. The 'upper house' is for 'regional governments only' which Mogadishu isn't.
In the event we adopt a 'district power-sharing lower house' 1 man 1 vote, Mogadishu will only get '3 mps' becuz it will be treated as a 'district' like other districts in the nation. Since Banadir isn't a 'legal' state, they're is no legality to give them 3 mps each over 16 'districts' as per 91 borders.
The other solution is to change Mogadishu legal status from 'state' to 'territory or district' and allocate it 'territory or district rights' which will be 'lot' less quota then regional states and less powers.
According to the U.S. Constitution, only states may be represented in the Congress of the United States. The District of Columbia is not a U.S. state and therefore has no voting representation. Instead, constituents in the district elect a non-voting delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives
According to Australia 'regional states' enjoy 12 senators while 'territories' enjoy only 2 senators. No matter which 'federal' system u look at the 'capital' must not have a political/tribal/state character and has to be 'unique' and different to the rest of the country's districts and states in terms of power-sharing.
The other question is if we agree on Mogadishu 'status' within our federal union, who will get their 'representation' will it be evenly split across the 'tribes 4.5 style' so it has a national character? or should we just take the D.C model and 'exclude' it from politics. I opt to exclude mogadishu so it doesn't lose it's capital character.
Should Mogadishu be represented in parliament and senate or should it be excluded?
The Pro Banadir arguments for states and district rights is.
1. They pay taxes
2. They have a 2 million population
The arguments against Banadir representation.
1. It's the capital and belong to all Somalis and therefore cannot take on a 'political, tribal, state' character
The current structure of the SFG is 'tribal 4.5 lower house' and 'regional state chamber'. If Hags want mogadishu to enjoy lower house representation, it will only come out of they're 4.5 portion not other clans. The 'upper house' is for 'regional governments only' which Mogadishu isn't.
In the event we adopt a 'district power-sharing lower house' 1 man 1 vote, Mogadishu will only get '3 mps' becuz it will be treated as a 'district' like other districts in the nation. Since Banadir isn't a 'legal' state, they're is no legality to give them 3 mps each over 16 'districts' as per 91 borders.
The other solution is to change Mogadishu legal status from 'state' to 'territory or district' and allocate it 'territory or district rights' which will be 'lot' less quota then regional states and less powers.
According to the U.S. Constitution, only states may be represented in the Congress of the United States. The District of Columbia is not a U.S. state and therefore has no voting representation. Instead, constituents in the district elect a non-voting delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives
According to Australia 'regional states' enjoy 12 senators while 'territories' enjoy only 2 senators. No matter which 'federal' system u look at the 'capital' must not have a political/tribal/state character and has to be 'unique' and different to the rest of the country's districts and states in terms of power-sharing.
The other question is if we agree on Mogadishu 'status' within our federal union, who will get their 'representation' will it be evenly split across the 'tribes 4.5 style' so it has a national character? or should we just take the D.C model and 'exclude' it from politics. I opt to exclude mogadishu so it doesn't lose it's capital character.
Last edited: