alright then thats all i needed to hear your verifiedAm proud Somali from samaale and I know my tribe and my community.
alright then thats all i needed to hear your verifiedAm proud Somali from samaale and I know my tribe and my community.
alright then thats all i needed to hear your verified
Please stop the waffling. The modifications in question aren't mere translation differences, but involve the actual removal of entire books and even specific verses. Historical instances, such as King James commissioning his own version of the Bible, exemplify cases where content was potentially altered to suit personal preferences.This is such a Tiktok comment level refutation of the legitimacy of the Bible. If there was a dialectic between a mufti and a bishop, the mufti wouldn’t bother saying this and he would know it’s ludicrous. These “updates” you are talking about are translations of the Bible. Unless you still speak Aramaic or Hebrew, the translation of the Bible has been a necessity. The differences between these translations have pretty much been exclusively grammatical. There have been no doctrinal changes. Nevertheless, do you think that there is no guidance about how the Bible should be interpreted? Christianity has its own equivalent version of “fiqh”.
You also do realise that there are translations of the Quran? So unless you read Arabic, everytime you look up a verse and it has been translated, you would agree it has been corrupted?