Marc Randolph co-founded Netflix with Reed Hastings. Randolph also serves as the company’s inaugural CEO.
Netflix requires no introduction, as it’s one of the leading streaming services in the world, influencing millions all around the world with its obvious LGBTQ agenda.
But its co-founder, Randolph, has a background unknown to many:
- He’s related to Freud, the man responsible for generalizing sexuality within Western public discourse.
- He’s also related to Bernays, who’s considered the father of propaganda. In fact Propaganda was the name of his 1928-book which influenced many, including Goebbels.
This is what Randolph wrote in the second chapter of his 2019-book, That Will Never Work: The Birth of Netflix and the Amazing Life of an Idea:
It was the sixties. Freudian analysis wasn’t exactly uncommon.But we didn’t have a miniature Freud museum in the library because anybody in the house was spending time on a therapist’s couch. It was because he was family. He was Uncle Siggy.
It’s a little more complicated than that. Freud was in fact my father’s great-uncle, making him my great-grand-uncle.
Still, no matter how convoluted the chain of connection, my parents were proud of the family association with Freud. He was a success, a giant of twentieth-century thought, as important an intellectual figure as had existed in their lifetime. It was like being related to Einstein: proof that the family had excelled on both sides of the Atlantic.
My family also had a connection to another important twentieth-century figure: Edward Bernays. Bernays was my grandmother’s brother, and Uncle Siggy’s nephew. If you’ve ever taken any course in advertising, if you’ve taken a course in mass media in the American twentieth century—heck, if you’ve even watched Mad Men or seen a cigarette ad—then you’re familiar with his work. Bernays is, in many ways, the father of modern public relations, the person who really figured out how to apply new discoveries in psychology and psychoanalysis to marketing. He’s the reason we eat bacon and eggs for breakfast. He’s also the reason we celebrate Thomas Edison (and not Joseph Swan) as the inventor of the lightbulb. He’s the guy who, after helping popularize bananas for United Fruit, turned around and waged a propaganda campaign alongside the CIA to stage a coup in Guatemala.
So, not always the most laudable stuff. But even though a lot of what Uncle Edward did wasn’t all that admirable, it did stick in my head that I could do what my father did, every night in our basement—use the tools he’d been given to create something.
Obviously we don’t believe in genetic determinism, in the sense that someone could be related to both Freud and Bernays without necessarily becoming an evil individual.
Regardless, we’ll be examining the imprints of both figures in Randolph’s golem, Netflix.
RELATED: The Biggest Company in the World and Its Social Engineering Agenda
Freud: Sex as the Ultimate Explanation
Freud too requires no introduction – quite simply put, he’s the single most influential modern psychologist.Even someone with only a casual interest in psychology has seen his face and knows that his main contribution is to try and make the whole of human existence revolve around questions of sexuality.
This view of sex being the dominant factor in life was controversial in his own time. In fact, it was controversial even among his own disciples, many who thus apostatized from the nascent Freudian church. Some of the dissidents include Jung, who would say “spirituality” is more important; and Otto Rank, for whom “the trauma of birth” (also the name of his most famous book) is itself the origin of human neurosis.
RELATED: The Jordan Peterson and Hamza Yusuf Discussion: A Review
One of Freud’s best-known theories is that of the Oedipus complex, which posits that a boy always remains in a sort of conflictual relationship with his father (who represents authority and discipline), while simultaneously perpetuating an incestuous desire for his mother.
This most important idea of Freud was rebutted quite early on. This is because during the ’20s, the Polish anthropologist Malinowski – while studying the Trobriand people of New Guinea – found out that in matrilineal societies it was not the father but the maternal uncle who represented “authority and discipline.” Thus the Oedipus complex wasn’t as “universal” as Freud had thought.
Sometime earlier, Finnish anthropologist Westermarck had also minimized Freud’s emphasis on incest by showing how individuals who live with each other as siblings do not develop a sexual attraction towards each other.
These critiques, along with others, are the reason Freud is no longer considered to be as authoritative as he was before. However his main idea still persists: Sex as ultimate explanatory device.
In the United States, his sexual agenda would be popularized thanks to another German-speaking Jewish psychoanalyst, Wilhelm Reich. Reich is considered the founder of “Freudo-Marxism,” a school which marries insights from both Freud and Marx.
More specifically, to the Marxist ideal of proletarian liberation through the revolutionary confiscation of the means of production, Reich and other Freudo-Marxists added the sexual angle: The “capitalist” and “bourgeois” state doesn’t only alienate the proletarian masses through pure economics, but also through “authoritarian” sexual repression.
Reich’s ideas are encapsulated in his 1936-book, The Sexual Revolution.
Within this book he unleashes diatribes against “patriarchal” religions, monogamous marriage, female chastity and even infantile sexuality – in the sense that, for Reich, children and adolescents should (or must) explore their sexuality more freely.
RELATED: Qawm Lut Uprising: Gay Choir Threatens to “Convert Your Children”
In the 1949 preface to the fourth edition of his book, he in fact boasts about how he’s the reason why encouraging free-sex among children and adolescents has become mainstream, since prior to him basically everyone was against it:
In 1928, when I founded the Socialist Society for Sexual Consultation and Sexual Research in Vienna, the genital rights of children and adolescents were denied. It was unthinkable for parents to tolerate sexual play, let alone to regard such manifestations as part of a natural, healthy development. The mere thought that adolescents would satisfy their need for love in the natural embrace was horrifying. Anyone who even mentioned these rights was slandered. Resistance to the first attempts to guarantee the love life of children and adolescents united groups of people who otherwise were violently opposed to each other: members of all religious denominations, socialists, Communists, psychologists, physicians, psychoanalysts, etc.
As this article isn’t really about Reich, we won’t delve further. However, the reader will certainly see how we still live in a Reichan world, as bashing “patriarchy” and promoting child sexuality are key features of the postmodern West.
RELATED: Superman Is Gay and Your Muslim Children Are Still Watching His Cartoons
In reality Reich was just a development of Freud, even if quite an extreme one. Ironically there’s even a sort of Oedipus complex between them: Reich figuratively “killed” his “father” Freud, as he agreed with Freud’s sexual agenda but believed that he remained too “conservative” in its applications.
Reich wasn’t Freud’s only legacy though.