He wasn't charged, they released him. That doesn't mean he's innocent. We wasn't found to be innocent. It just means they had insufficient evidence at the time, and you an't just hold someone without charge.
There's plenty of evidence for his crimes, and those of other warlords. If tried these people would certainly be found guilty.
You can accuse Qeybdiid of being a lot of things but not a warlord.
Qeybdiid was part of the
London Somalia Conferences a few years ago, do you think the US, EU would have allowed him to participate if he was a warlord?
He is currently a Somali Senator, do you think the IC would let a warlord be part of the Senate of a fragile state?
To compare him to Morgan is ridiculous and downright disingenuous. Morgan commited xasuuq from Saylac to Ras Kambooni.
Whilst Qeybdiid is a man who gave water and food to dirty Kacaan soldiers he captured.
@ 16;47
Any other rebel leader would have shot them.
He wasn't charged, they released him. That doesn't mean he's innocent. We wasn't found to be innocent.
The Swedish court cleared him of all baseless claims of him being a warlord. The "evidence", a video, provided against him was proven to be a heavily edited.
Swedish Police Release Former Somali Militiaman Accused of War Crimes
But a court-appointed lawyer said
the videotape was heavily edited and proved nothing.
Information for this report provided by AP and Reuters.
http://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-2005-10-20-voa64-67367587/273952.html
Morgan on the other hand...
